Linky?I saw the video only because he put it up on Rumble, too
Didn't save it.Linky?
From his physique - as he lifted his gown up, showing EKG monitor pads - from his shape, I'd say he was an excellent physical specimen. I'm thinking, a runner or triathalon. I didn't have abs like that even when I was an eight-mile-a-day man.He looks fairly healthy for having just gone through that ordeal. I suppose it could still be faked but that seems to be too much effort for the goons. There were like 10 copies on there when I searched.
It kicked my butt for a good 6 weeks and the after effects lasted longer.That flu must be bad ass.
Linky?
It's on Telegram...Guess what the Ewe Toob fact-checkers did. Yup, his entire account is cancelled.
Steve Kirsch, linked in the Telegram page, points out how...WELL...the nooze mediuh have been able to suppress this.It's on Telegram...
![]()
We The Pepe
This is why the commercial airlines are a MESS. Vaxxed pilots are a national security threat. Lame stream media covers up pilot cardiac arrest because they don't want to create vaccine hesitancy, maybe even flight hesitancy...t.me
Originally the Red Cross said they weren't accepting donations from vaxxed people but I think they were 'leaned on' by pHarma and now accept donations, they just aren't used. Hopefully they dispose of the blood clots responsibly.
Jesus!Had several interesting things today. Not good.
My daughter, returning from a Palm Springs vacation was not allowed on the plane bc her 5 yr old did not have a recent covid test. She had to reschedule her flights. They wouldn't allow a five yr old on the plane.
Saw a friend I haven't seen in a while. She has extreme pain in her left arm, been going on for months and dr.s don't know what's going on.
A woman I just met was diagnosed with kidney cancer. Never smoked, or drank, healthy active, young. They removed her kidney. No idea of vaxx status.
Oh and a previous co-worker was just diagnosed with cancer, def. vaxxed.
Nope! We live in a real life horror movie complete with deadly pathogens and viruses, social destruction and the epic evil Satanists!I don't think there has been a day recently where I was driving around this small town and did not see an Ambulance with it's lights on. Either passing me or crossing in front or whatever. And now they are rapidly putting up 5G antenna. Coincidence?
Every day it gets more surreal.Jesus!
British children up to 52 times more likely to die following a COVID shot: gov’t report
Data from Britain's Office for National Statistics show a stark increase in deaths among children both single- and double-jabbed compared to their un-jabbed counterparts.
Child receiving a vaccinationShutterstock![]()
David McLoone
Wed Feb 2, 2022 - 10:19 am EST
LONDON (LifeSiteNews) – Britain’s Office for National Statistics (ONS) has released data indicating that children who received the COVID-19 jabs have suffered a death rate 54 times greater than that of their un-jabbed counterparts.
In December, the ONS published age-standardized data on the mortality rates of individuals in 5-year age sets in Britain, grouped by their “vaccination” status for the COVID-19 shots. The data accounts for the period from January 1 to October 31, 2021.
The ONS tabulated “Monthly age-standardised mortality rates by age-group and vaccination status for deaths involving COVID-19, per 100,000 person-years” but presented the data only for ages 18 and over. However, the jabs are available to children as young as 12, and those children are allowed to receive the shot against their parents’ wishes. In limited cases, children as young as 5 have been given a reduced dosage of the shots.
Nevertheless, as noted by The Exposé, a separate table outlining “deaths and person-years by vaccination status” includes 5-year age groups from 10-years-old and up. From the data provided, a calculation of the mortality rate per 100,000 person-years can be made.
The rate per 100,000 person-years delineation is used in preference over the simpler 100,000 population calculation to better represent the mortality rates over a specific period of time, as people in one “vaccination” group – such as un-jabbed, single-jabbed, and double-jabbed – soon move into the next group.
Table 9 of the ONS report shows the “deaths and person-years by vaccination status and five-year age group” for the entire ten-month period. According to the report, the un-jabbed 10–14-year-old group represents 2,094,711 person-years, and the 15–19 age set 1,587,072 person-years over the same time.
Table 9, ONS Report![]()
From the above table the 100,000 person-years calculation can be made, with the younger group coming out at 20.9 un-jabbed per 100,000 person-years and the older group at 15.9. Following this, the mortality rate per 100,000 person-years is worked out by dividing the number of deaths within each group by the 100,000 person-years calculation.
The result is that for the 10–14 year group, the un-jabbed mortality per 100,000 person-years is 4.6 while the un-jabbed mortality rate per 100,000 person-years for the 15–19 group is 10.1.
Using the same data set and calculation, the mortality rate for 10–14-year-olds who received one dose of the jabs suffered a 45.1 per 100,000 person-years death rate, while 15–19-year-olds with one jab suffered 18.3 deaths per 100,00 person-years.
Table 9, ONS Report
Table 9, ONS Report![]()
Among those who received two doses of the COVID jabs in both young age groups, the death rates were higher still, with 32.9 deaths per 100,000 person-years among the 15–19 age group and a staggering 238.4 deaths per 100,000 person-years among 10–14-year-olds in the U.K.
The data show a stark increase in deaths among children both single- and double-jabbed compared to their un-jabbed counterparts. For children aged 15–19, the risk of death increases by almost double if they take the first shot and by over three times if they take the second.
US Canada Catholic
10–14-year-olds, on the other hand, run the risk of dying almost by a factor of ten following the first dose while the second dose brings a 51.8 times greater risk of death than if they had remained un-jabbed.
On average, it means that children between 10 and 19 years of age who had received at least one shot of the COVID jabs had a 3.7 times greater chance of dying between January and October last year.
Additionally, according to the ONS’ “five-year average weekly deaths by sex and age group” figures between 2015 and 2019 among children ages 10-14, recorded deaths have risen by 44 percent above the average in weekly figures provided by the ONS for 2021.
The JCVI, an independent adviser to the U.K. government on immunization programs, determined in a September 3 statement that the “available evidence indicates that the individual health benefits from COVID-19 vaccination are small in those aged 12 to 15 years.” They added that any benefit granted by the shots is only “marginally greater than the potential known harms,” while acknowledging that “there is considerable uncertainty regarding the magnitude of the potential harms.”
Given the uncertainty of risks involved with the COVID shots, the JCVI considered the benefits “too small to support advice on a universal programme of vaccination of otherwise healthy 12- to 15-year-old children at this time.”
Moreover, COVID shot trials have never produced evidence that the vaccines stop infection or transmission. They do not even claim to reduce hospitalization, but the measurement of success is in preventing severe symptoms of COVID-19 disease. Indeed, there is strong evidence that the “vaccinated” are just as likely to carry and transmit the virus as the unvaccinated.
Many Catholics and other Christians have rejected the currently available COVID inoculations because they were developed or tested using cell lines derived from aborted children.
![]()
British children up to 52 times more likely to die following a COVID shot: gov't report - LifeSite
Data from Britain's Office for National Statistics show a stark increase in deaths among children both single- and double-jabbed compared to their un-jabbed counterparts.www.lifesitenews.com
The first table (9) shows 156 deaths amongst the unvaccinated and 2nd table (9) 35 amongst the vaccinated. What am I missing?British children up to 52 times more likely to die following a COVID shot: gov’t report
Data from Britain's Office for National Statistics show a stark increase in deaths among children both single- and double-jabbed compared to their un-jabbed counterparts.
Child receiving a vaccinationShutterstock![]()
David McLoone
Wed Feb 2, 2022 - 10:19 am EST
LONDON (LifeSiteNews) – Britain’s Office for National Statistics (ONS) has released data indicating that children who received the COVID-19 jabs have suffered a death rate 54 times greater than that of their un-jabbed counterparts.
In December, the ONS published age-standardized data on the mortality rates of individuals in 5-year age sets in Britain, grouped by their “vaccination” status for the COVID-19 shots. The data accounts for the period from January 1 to October 31, 2021.
The ONS tabulated “Monthly age-standardised mortality rates by age-group and vaccination status for deaths involving COVID-19, per 100,000 person-years” but presented the data only for ages 18 and over. However, the jabs are available to children as young as 12, and those children are allowed to receive the shot against their parents’ wishes. In limited cases, children as young as 5 have been given a reduced dosage of the shots.
Nevertheless, as noted by The Exposé, a separate table outlining “deaths and person-years by vaccination status” includes 5-year age groups from 10-years-old and up. From the data provided, a calculation of the mortality rate per 100,000 person-years can be made.
The rate per 100,000 person-years delineation is used in preference over the simpler 100,000 population calculation to better represent the mortality rates over a specific period of time, as people in one “vaccination” group – such as un-jabbed, single-jabbed, and double-jabbed – soon move into the next group.
Table 9 of the ONS report shows the “deaths and person-years by vaccination status and five-year age group” for the entire ten-month period. According to the report, the un-jabbed 10–14-year-old group represents 2,094,711 person-years, and the 15–19 age set 1,587,072 person-years over the same time.
Table 9, ONS Report![]()
From the above table the 100,000 person-years calculation can be made, with the younger group coming out at 20.9 un-jabbed per 100,000 person-years and the older group at 15.9. Following this, the mortality rate per 100,000 person-years is worked out by dividing the number of deaths within each group by the 100,000 person-years calculation.
The result is that for the 10–14 year group, the un-jabbed mortality per 100,000 person-years is 4.6 while the un-jabbed mortality rate per 100,000 person-years for the 15–19 group is 10.1.
Using the same data set and calculation, the mortality rate for 10–14-year-olds who received one dose of the jabs suffered a 45.1 per 100,000 person-years death rate, while 15–19-year-olds with one jab suffered 18.3 deaths per 100,00 person-years.
Table 9, ONS Report
Table 9, ONS Report![]()
Among those who received two doses of the COVID jabs in both young age groups, the death rates were higher still, with 32.9 deaths per 100,000 person-years among the 15–19 age group and a staggering 238.4 deaths per 100,000 person-years among 10–14-year-olds in the U.K.
The data show a stark increase in deaths among children both single- and double-jabbed compared to their un-jabbed counterparts. For children aged 15–19, the risk of death increases by almost double if they take the first shot and by over three times if they take the second.
US Canada Catholic
10–14-year-olds, on the other hand, run the risk of dying almost by a factor of ten following the first dose while the second dose brings a 51.8 times greater risk of death than if they had remained un-jabbed.
On average, it means that children between 10 and 19 years of age who had received at least one shot of the COVID jabs had a 3.7 times greater chance of dying between January and October last year.
Additionally, according to the ONS’ “five-year average weekly deaths by sex and age group” figures between 2015 and 2019 among children ages 10-14, recorded deaths have risen by 44 percent above the average in weekly figures provided by the ONS for 2021.
The JCVI, an independent adviser to the U.K. government on immunization programs, determined in a September 3 statement that the “available evidence indicates that the individual health benefits from COVID-19 vaccination are small in those aged 12 to 15 years.” They added that any benefit granted by the shots is only “marginally greater than the potential known harms,” while acknowledging that “there is considerable uncertainty regarding the magnitude of the potential harms.”
Given the uncertainty of risks involved with the COVID shots, the JCVI considered the benefits “too small to support advice on a universal programme of vaccination of otherwise healthy 12- to 15-year-old children at this time.”
Moreover, COVID shot trials have never produced evidence that the vaccines stop infection or transmission. They do not even claim to reduce hospitalization, but the measurement of success is in preventing severe symptoms of COVID-19 disease. Indeed, there is strong evidence that the “vaccinated” are just as likely to carry and transmit the virus as the unvaccinated.
Many Catholics and other Christians have rejected the currently available COVID inoculations because they were developed or tested using cell lines derived from aborted children.
![]()
British children up to 52 times more likely to die following a COVID shot: gov't report - LifeSite
Data from Britain's Office for National Statistics show a stark increase in deaths among children both single- and double-jabbed compared to their un-jabbed counterparts.www.lifesitenews.com
Moderna applying for approval of vax for 6mon old and older:
![]()
COVID-19: Moderna to apply to use vaccine for very young children
Company to ask US health regulator to approve vaccine for 6 month to 5-year-oldsgulfnews.com
I'd donate unvaxxed blood butThe local blood banks will not accept any blood from those "vaccinated" with an mRNA product.
You said it.Murdering bastards.
I doubt they are going to discriminate based on vax status, and the double vaxxed are lining up to donate in record amounts despite Red Cross saying they have huge shortages....The hospitals are treating the vax injured like never before.Originally the Red Cross said they weren't accepting donations from vaxxed people but I think they were 'leaned on' by pHarma and now accept donations, they just aren't used. Hopefully they dispose of the blood clots responsibly.
This is a fairly standard legal provision for the treatment of confidential materials.Texas lab signed a confidential agreement to destroy Wuhan lab information: