The Virus is Not Infective, It's Fake News for 100 years used to control populations.

[Bigjon]

Coronavirus: You've been brainwashed (Here's how they did it)

For my way of perceiving, there seems to be as much brain washing in this video as it complains about. Replace Hitler with Jews and it comes out much truer than all the credit given to Hitler.

It seems the Jews who so dominate the print news industry of that time also changed Douglas Reed's news reports from mostly Germans locked up, to all Jews locked up.

 

[arminius]

Let's call em zionists, the more appropriate political designation. And yes, same shit different day.

 

[arminius]

BÉCHAMP OR PASTEUR?
A LOST CHAPTER IN THE HISTORY OF BIOLOGY

PASTEUR: PLAGIARIST, IMPOSTOR

THE GERM THEORY EXPLODED

“If I could live my life over again, I would devote it to proving that germs seek their natural habitat, diseased tissue – rather than being the cause of the diseased tissue.”
– Rudolph Virchow

“Nothing is lost, nothing is created ... all is transformed. Nothing is the prey of death. All is the prey of life.”
– Antoine Béchamp

“The specific disease doctrine is the grand refuge of weak, uncultured, unstable minds, such as now rule in the medical profession. There are no specific diseases; there are specific disease conditions.”
– Florence Nightingale

Béchamp or Pasteur?

A Lost Chapter in the History of Biology

ETHEL DOUGLAS HUME

The Germ Theory Exploded

**************************************************************
Long but worth it if you want the truth...

 

[arminius]

 

[arminius]

 

[cameo]

I honestly believe this "Covid-19 virus" is a load of BULLSHlT invented for nefarious reasons, such as determining any unforseen problems with population control regarding finance, housing, food, health, self quarantines, curfews, and policing of the citizens.

Most people are scared to death of this "virus" and have allowed themselves to be herded into obeying all sorts of health organizations` orders/suggestions in order to save themselves.

My "evidence" is the fact that I and my entire family, including everyone we know and associate with hasn`t been a "victim" of this alleged "virus". I personally do not know of ONE single instance of a person contracting the virus other than what I`ve read. I believe that any reported cases are in fact just the FLU and nothing more. Not that the flu is any less dangerous, or more preferable, but it`s consideably more common than other viruses.

All in my family have been out shopping on a regular basis ....... going to work ....... etc etc ....... and not ONE case of the Covid-19 to date !!

It`s like winning the Lottery ...... you read about the winners, but it`s NEVER YOU .

I don`t think it`s the Covid-19 that we should be worried about, but the agenda behind it .

 

[Silver]

BÉCHAMP OR PASTEUR?
A LOST CHAPTER IN THE HISTORY OF BIOLOGY

PASTEUR: PLAGIARIST, IMPOSTOR

THE GERM THEORY EXPLODED

“If I could live my life over again, I would devote it to proving that germs seek their natural habitat, diseased tissue – rather than being the cause of the diseased tissue.”
– Rudolph Virchow

“Nothing is lost, nothing is created ... all is transformed. Nothing is the prey of death. All is the prey of life.”
– Antoine Béchamp

“The specific disease doctrine is the grand refuge of weak, uncultured, unstable minds, such as now rule in the medical profession. There are no specific diseases; there are specific disease conditions.”
– Florence Nightingale

Béchamp or Pasteur?

A Lost Chapter in the History of Biology

ETHEL DOUGLAS HUME

The Germ Theory Exploded

**************************************************************
Long but worth it if you want the truth...

Gonorrhea is proof you can get a disease from contact with someone that has it.

 

[Juristic Person]

Gonorrhea is proof you can get a disease from contact with someone that has it.

No it’s not. Gonorrhea is a bacterial infection. It’s not a virus.

 

[Silver]

No it’s not. Gonorrhea is a bacterial infection. It’s not a virus.

The article was about 'Germ Theory' and infection, not whether it was viral or bacterial.

 

[arminius]

Interesting question. Is Neisseria Gonorrhoea is considered a germ. Yes, it is a microorganism that is infective, the definition of a germ. It is a bacteria that requires mucus membrane to mucus membrane to infect. And this bacterial 'germ' was discovered in 1879 with a microscope. There's a huge size difference between a virus and a bacteria. Bacteria are in the range of micrometers, and so called viruses are in the range of billionths of a meter. As usual, things aren't easily fitted into respective catagories we want to put them in. In this case yes technically bacteria are microorganisms and infective with close contact, but even then another interesting question, and nearly impossible to test, is that how many were infected with the bacteria and did not have any symptoms, because their immune system took care of it.

In the above discourse, germ means virus. The wording is retarded because it's not something they want folks to look closely at.

 

[the_shootist]

The article was about 'Germ Theory' and infection, not whether it was viral or bacterial.

The difference between a virus and bacteria are like night and day. The two simply should not be rolled together. Bacteria is living, virus is not. I knew this well before the beer virus was a thing. Most people don't!

 

[Goldbrix]

The word “virus” means poison or noxious substance.

virus (n.)​

late 14c., "poisonous substance," from Latin virus "poison, sap of plants, slimy liquid, a potent juice," from Proto-Italic *weis-o-(s-) "poison," which is probably from a PIE root *ueis-, perhaps originally meaning "to melt away, to flow," used of foul or malodorous fluids, but with specialization in some languages to "poisonous fluid" (source also of Sanskrit visam "venom, poison," visah "poisonous;" Avestan vish- "poison;" Latin viscum "sticky substance, birdlime;" Greek ios "poison," ixos "mistletoe, birdlime;" Old Church Slavonic višnja "cherry;" Old Irish fi "poison;" Welsh gwy "poison"). The meaning "agent that causes infectious disease" is recorded by 1728 (in reference to venereal disease); the modern scientific use dates to the 1880s. The computer sense is from 1972.​

So the encapsulization of this thread is that Viruses are not transmissible from person to person, and thus cannot be pandemic. What science (sic) calls a virus today is actually a product of the human cell, that cell being poisoned with an external compound, and thus creates a remedy for cell repair, particles released from the cell called Exosomes. These Exosome vesicles that the cell creates is an attempt to repair the cell, and thus homeostasis. But these Exosome vessicles have been identified as an external infecting VIRUS. They are not infective, and they are not from any external source. Repeat. THEY ARE NOT INFECTIVE. This has been proven with the medical standard of double blind studies. And ignored in favor of better population control through induced mental contagion.

Studies have been done, and ignored because the conclusion doesn't benefit the current hysteria, and long term hysteria of the VIRUS as a boogieman of our nightmares and thus population control methods.

This is the real story of the virus...

--- Well worth the 90 minutes.

Must be because "yuutube" took it down

 

[Goldbrix]

Man made /generated alterations has made this far more dangerous than what people view as the Common Cold.
Of course the top line claims the list as just EXAMPLES.

 

[arminius]

View attachment 170595

Man made /generated POISONS has made this far more dangerous than what people view as the Common Cold.

Of course the top line claims the list as just EXAMPLES.

FIFY

 

[arminius]

Questioning Covid-19 with Dr. Andrew Kaufman, Dr. Kelly Brogan, and Dr. Barre Lando

Discussion of virus, also gets into germ theory vs terrain theory.

https://www.altcensored.com/watch?v=hsEZLKEaTl4

 

[arminius]

Germ Theory Versus Terrain: The Wrong Side Won the Day

JULY 30, 2019 BY MERINDA TELLER, MPH, PHD 25 COMMENTS

Germ Theory Versus Terrain: The Wrong Side Won the Day

Whereas most Americans probably have heard of Louis Pasteur (1822–1895), it is doubtful that many are familiar with the name and work of Antoine Béchamp (1816–1908). The two nineteenth-century researchers were scientific contemporaries, compatriots and fellow members of the French Academy of Science, but key differences in their views on biology and disease pathology led to a prolonged rivalry both within and outside of the Academy.1

Béchamp was the more brilliant thinker, but Pasteur had political connections, including Emperor Napoleon III. Reportedly not above “plagiarising and distorting Béchamp’s research,”2 Pasteur achieved fame and fortune largely because his views “were in tune with the science and the politics of his day.”1 Meanwhile, mainstream medical historians relegated Béchamp’s ideas—not as attractive to conventional thinkers—to the intellectual dustbin.3

Pasteur’s promotion of germ theory (a flawed notion that he did not so much “discover” as repackage) has remained “dear to pharmaceutical company executives’ hearts” up to the present day,4 having laid the groundwork for “synthetic drugs, chemotherapy, radiation, surgical removal of body parts and vaccines” to become the “medicine of choice.”5 The unshakeable belief that there is one microbe for every illness is so ingrained as the “controlling medical idea for the Western world” that competing ideas about disease causation still have difficulty gaining traction.6

Over a century after the two Frenchmen’s demise, why bother to revisit their place in history? The answer is that the scientific (and industry) bias in favor of Pasteur’s model has not served the public’s health—to the contrary. Two decades into the twenty-first century, dismal national and international health statistics utterly belie the hype about medical advances.7 In the U.S., for example, over half of all children have one or more chronic conditions,8 as does a comparable proportion of millennials9 and up to 62 percent of Medicaid-population adults.10 Most health care dollars spent in the U.S. (86 percent) are for patients with at least one chronic condition.10 Similar trends are on the rise around the world.11

For those who are able to steel themselves against medical propaganda, it is abundantly clear that the Pasteurian paradigm has failed to deliver. With Americans in such a shocking state of ill health,12 we cannot afford to let the profit-driven pharmaceutical perspective continue to dominate. As one writer more bluntly puts it, “The sooner we get over the legacy of Pasteur’s fake science and get back to reality the better.”13

CELEBRITY VS. HERETIC
History awarded renown to the reductionist Pasteur for being the “father of immunology”14 and popularizing the theory that disease involves “a simple interaction between specific microorganisms and a host.”15 In his singleminded focus on the germ side of the equation, Pasteur ignored the host and discounted the influence of environmental factors, thereby “conveniently dismissing social responsibility for disease.”15

Both at the time and thereafter, the public and most fellow scientists found germ theory easy to embrace, perceiving Pasteur’s model of life and health to be not only “superficially plausible” but also “financially exploitable.”3 In fact, most of the big-name pharmaceutical companies that we know today got their start in Pasteur’s era, often by merging with chemical firms, united in their goal of developing and selling synthetic products to “selectively kill or immobilize parasites, bacteria, and other invasive disease-causing microbes.”16 Quoting comments by Ethel Douglas Hume in 1923,17 one author has remarked that Pasteur’s “greatest claim to fame ought to have been the inauguration of the ‘calamitous prostitution of science and medicine to commercialism.’”3

Béchamp, according to his fans, held a rather “marvelous view of the life process”3 and espoused a more nuanced perspective on infectious and chronic illness—for which history branded him a heretic. Much of Béchamp’s work centered on the biological role of fermentation.18 He coined the term “microzymas” (from zyme, the ancient Greek word for a ferment)19 to describe tiny particles that he viewed as the “primary anatomical elements of all living beings”—“the beginning and end of all organization.”20 Béchamp viewed these particles as living entities precisely because of their “power of movement and production of fermentation.”20 Subsequent generations of open-minded researchers agreed with Béchamp’s pioneering observations about microparticles as the fundamental unit of biology, with the most recent research in this vein proposing a new genetic theory and a “universal life paradigm” involving spontaneous self-assembly of DNA.21

Béchamp’s various discoveries led him to conclude that our bodies are, in effect, “miniecosystems.” When an individual’s internal ecosystem becomes weakened—whether due to poor nutrition, toxicity or other factors—it changes the function of the microbes that are naturally present in the body, producing disease.20 In other words, microorganisms only become pathogenic after environmental factors cause the host’s cellular “terrain” to deteriorate.15

As one example of the powerful influence of weakening forces on the host’s ecosystem, a mid-1980s study looked at French children who experienced complications of wild-type varicella (chickenpox).22 (Note: France has never implemented varicella vaccination.) Although three deaths resulted from what is ordinarily an extremely benign childhood illness, all three fatalities took place within a subset of nine children who had been taking steroid medications on a long-term basis. In comparison, ninety-four previously healthy children recovered from varicella without incident. The researchers concluded that the deaths occurred “as a function of the [weakened] terrain.”

PROBLEMS OF OUR OWN MAKING
Many of the disease phenomena making news headlines these days underscore the deficiencies of the pharmaceutical model and reveal challenges that are the direct result of our take-no-prisoners assault on germs.

For example, dangerous superbugs23,24 are emerging—largely due to overuse of “anti-everything” drugs such as antibiotics and antifungals—and are ushering in a potential return “to a world in which infectious diseases drastically shorten lives.”25 Some have estimated that drug-resistant pathogens will become a bigger killer than cancer by 2050.25

Although the conventional pharmacopeia that created the superbug problem has thus far been helpless to address it, experts are unwilling to step out of the lucrative Pasteurian mindset. Thus, leading researchers at Harvard, GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) and Cincinnati Children’s Hospital suggest that the solution to superbugs is. . .more antibiotics, plus vaccines!25 In proposing vaccines as a response, the trio of establishment researchers makes the argument that vaccines are “evolution-proof” and do not generate resistance.25 The GSK researcher also confidently asserts that vaccination is “the most effective medical intervention that has ever been introduced”—and gives Pasteur considerable credit.26

INCONVENIENT FACTS
The complacent attitude that vaccines are the answer for everything sidesteps many inconvenient facts—documented by numerous studies—showing that vaccines are far from predictable or beneficial. In fact, in refutation of the static perspective promoted by Pasteur and evoked by the authors who want to use super-vaccines to solve superbug problems, vaccines not only increasingly fail to protect recipients against the microbes they target but are promoting increased susceptibility to vaccine strains as well as other strains and pathogens, while also augmenting disease severity.27

For example:

• Children who receive pertussis-containing vaccines are more susceptible to pertussis “throughout their lifetimes”;28 five years after completing a pertussis vaccine series, a child will be up to fifteen times more likely to acquire pertussis than in the first year after receiving the vaccine series.29

• Flu shots make people more susceptible to other severe respiratory viruses,30 and people who get flu shots annually are more susceptible to non-vaccine strains of influenza.31

• In clinical trials of Merck’s human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine Gardasil, women with evidence of current or prior exposure to HPV had a 44 percent increased risk of developing cervical lesions or cancer after receiving the vaccine.32

• Waning vaccine-based immunity has increased measles33 and mumps34 severity in the most vulnerable age groups.

Béchamp surely would have had some comments about these significant breakdowns in vaccination’s underlying assumptions. In addition, he likely would have been disturbed by the vaccine industry’s little-discussed reliance on DNA from species such as birds, dogs, monkeys, cows, pigs, mice and insects in vaccine manufacturing.35 Noting Béchamp’s belief that “an organism’s microzymas are unique to it, and are not interchangeable with those of another,” a modern author suggests that Béchamp would disapprove of introducing microzymas “proper to one species. . .into an animal of another species”—which is exactly what vaccines do.3 This author continues:

How. . .foolhardy is it then, when vaccinal microzymas are not only from another species, but are already morbidly evolved and are accompanied by preservatives, formaldehyde, and other chemicals? There is no sanity whatever to this practice. The best that can be said about it is that it may prevent, against the odds, the appearance of varying sets of symptoms. But this is at the price of weakening the immune system, toxifying the body, and possibly setting the stage for degenerative symptoms later in life—all the while doing absolutely nothing for, except perhaps worsening, the underlying disease condition.

The picture of weakening and degeneration painted in the previous quote is in fact precisely what is now occurring on a massive scale. In his 2018 book Vaccines, Autoimmunity, and the Changing Nature of Childhood Illness, Dr. Thomas Cowan (founding Weston A. Price Foundation board member) describes how “immune system imbalance disorders” are debilitating both children and adults in record numbers “unheard of before the introduction of mass vaccination programs.”36 Explaining why the (Pasteur-influenced) model of vaccine-induced immunity is so flawed, Cowan notes that vaccines deliberately favor and provoke one type of immune response (antibodies) but short-circuit the other crucial prong of our immune system (cell-mediated activity). In short, vaccines generate a state of “excessive antibody production”—and “this excessive antibody production actually defines autoimmune disease” [emphasis in original].36

GUT HEALTH
The worrisome iatrogenic challenges posed by superbugs and vaccine failure are bad enough. However, the Pasteur-influenced medical model also must accept a share of blame for the widespread disruption of the human microbiome that is such a standout feature of the modern ill-health picture.37 Awareness of the intestinal microbiome’s critical importance in providing “resilience against external perturbation” 38 has increased in recent years, in tandem with awareness of the factors exerting an adverse influence on gut health. The latter include antibiotics, of course, but also toxins such as glyphosate, which alters the gastrointestinal microbiome in favor of pathogenic microbes.39 Diminished microorganism diversity in the gut has been associated with conditions as varied as “allergy, diabetes, obesity, arthritis, inflammatory bowel diseases and. . .neuropsychiatric disorders.”40

Researchers who study the microbiome point out that under optimal circumstances, exposure to microorganisms educates the immune system “from the moment we are born”—and that “correct microbial-based education of immune cells may be critical in preventing the development of autoimmune diseases and cancer.”40 Reflecting this knowledge, Cowan devotes an entire chapter in his autoimmunity book to gut ecology (“the preserver of our integrity”) and to the ways in which this form of “early education” can go awry even from birth.36

Factors that compromise microbiome diversity, probably synergistically, include C-sections (which prevent babies from picking up healthy microbes in the birth canal); vaginal birth to mothers whose own internal ecology is skewed by prior antibiotic use or other factors; the standard American diet, full of genetically modified (GM) ingredients and antibiotics and lacking in live cultured and fermented foods; ubiquitous glyphosate; and, finally, vaccination. Regarding the latter, Cowan states:

t has been shown that vaccination does have a direct effect on the microbiome and gut permeability even when given intramuscularly, not orally. The precise mechanism of how this happens is unknown, but I believe that anytime you affect the balance of immune response, you affect the largest and most important organ system of immune response that we have—the gut.

PARADIGM LOST
If the medical community were honest, it would be forced to admit that the model of disease that catapulted Pasteur to fame has played itself out and is pushing us to disability and death.

Here and there, scientists working within the mainstream framework recognize this. For example, researchers tackling the problem of multi-drug-resistant tuberculosis (TB) acknowledge that a wide variety of factors increases host susceptibility to TB and TB mortality, including “immune-dysregulation from any cause (including stress, poor living conditions, socioeconomic factors, micronutrient deficiencies, HIV), malnutrition, aberrant or excess host inflammatory response to infection, alcohol and substance abuse, co-morbidities with noncommunicable diseases such as diabetes, smoking, and chronic obstructive airways disease, [and] pneumoconiosis.”41 They suggest, therefore, that it is time to build on “the historical Pasteur-Bechamp debates on the role of the ‘microbe’ vs the ‘host internal milieu’ in disease causation” and invest in “host-directed therapies” (HDTs) that “alter the ‘host terrain’ in favor of the host.” Unfortunately, what HDTs mean to this group of researchers is. . .more pharmaceutical interventions.41

Realistically, we cannot expect researchers who receive direct or indirect funding from the pharmaceutical industry to suggest commonsense steps for supporting or strengthening the immune system. If Béchamp were around today, chances are that his recommendations would be more sound, emphasizing basics such as high-quality nutrition and excellent sleep. At a deeper level, Cowan also reminds us that the quest for a life of “abundance, joy, and meaning” is equally important and sustaining to our health.

SIDEBAR

GETTING OUT OF THE WAY
“Our job as parents, doctors, and caretakers for children is mostly to observe and, only when needed, help guide a process to its healthy conclusion. But mostly we don’t. We intervene. We manage. We attempt to control. Doing something, anything, temporarily assuages our fears (and creates massive industries in the process).

The result, however, is. . .a medicalized society that must devote huge resources to dealing with sick people; as the amount of medicine in our world increases, so, too, does the amount of sickness. Beyond a certain basic level of care, use of more medicine not only undermines an individual’s freedom and autonomy, but also degrades a society’s health.”

SOURCE: Thomas Cowan, Vaccines, Autoimmunity, and the Changing Nature of Childhood Illness. White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green Publishing;
2018, p. 137.

REFERENCES
1. Cantwell A. Cancer and most diseases are caused by BACTERIA: Bechamp’s microzymas & human disease. March 17, 2017. https://rense.com/general96/bechamps.htm/.
2. Review of Béchamp A, The Blood and Its Third Element. https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/2213391.The_Blood_and_Its_Third_Element.
3. Young RO. Who had their finger on the magic of life—Antoine Bechamp or Louis Pasteur? Int J Vaccines Vaccin 2016;2(5):00047.
4. Williams LL. Radical Medicine: Profound Intervention in a Profoundly Toxic Age (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: International Medical Arts Publishing, 2007-2008, p. 34.
5. “Honoring Antoine Béchamp: The gentle giant of science & medicine.” https://oawhealth.com/article/honoring-antoine-bechamp-the-gentle-giant-of-science-medicine/.
6. Appleton N. Why Louis Pasteur’s germ theory is a curse. http://whale.to/w/appleton1.html.
7. Cox L, Peck P. The top 10 medical advances of the decade—from genome to hormones, doctors pick the top medical advances of the decade. MedPage Today, Dec. 17, 2009.
8. Bethell CD, Kogan MD, Strickland BB et al. A national and state profile of leading health problems and health care quality for US children: key insurance disparities and across-state variations. Acad Pediatr 2011;11(3 Suppl):S22-S33.
9. “Highlights: 2016 millennials survey.” https://www.transamericacenterforhe...reresearch/2016-millennials-survey-highlights.
10. Chapel JM, Ritchey MD, Zhang D et al. Prevalence and medical costs of chronic diseases among adult Medicaid beneficiaries. Am J Prev Med 2017;53(6 Suppl 2):S143-S154.
11. GBD 2017 Child and Adolescent Health Collaborators, Reiner RC Jr., Olsen HE, et al. Diseases, injuries, and risk factors in child and adolescent health, 1990 to 2017: findings from the Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors 2017 study. JAMA Pediatr 2019 Apr 29:e190337.
12. Aldhous P. Why Americans are so damn unhealthy, in 4 shocking charts. BuzzFeed News, May 24, 2017.
13. https://arizonaenergy.org/BodyEnergy/antoine_bechamp.htm.
14. Smith KA. Louis Pasteur, the father of immunology? Front Immunol 2012;3:68.
15. Raines K. Pasteur vs Béchamp: The germ theory debate. The Vaccine Reaction, Feb. 6, 2018.
16. “Emergence of pharmaceutical science and industry: 1870-1930.” https://pubsapp.acs.org/cen/coverstory/83/8325/8325emergence.html.
17. Hume ED. Béchamp or Pasteur? A Lost Chapter in the History of Biology. http://www.mnwelldir.org/docs/history/biographies/Bechamp-or-Pasteur.pdf.
18. “Antoine Béchamp.” http://www.pnf.org/compendium/Antoine_Bechamp.pdf.
19. “Zyme.” https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/zyme.
20. “History – Antoine Béchamp.” https://www.brmi.online/antoine-bechamp.
21. Lee H-S, Lee B-C, Kang D-I. Spontaneous self-assembly of DNA fragments into nucleus-like structures from yolk granules of fertilized chicken eggs: Antoine Béchamp meets Bong Han Kim via Olga Lepeshinskaya. Micron 2013;51:54-59.
22. François P, Guyot A, Jean D et al. [Complications of varicella as a function of the terrain. Apropos of 103 cases.] [Article in French] Pediatrie 1985;40(2):99-106.
23. Ventola CL. The antibiotic resistance crisis. Part 1: causes and threats. P T 2015;40(4):277-83.
24. Schiavone R. Drug-resistant superbug confirmed in California. Patch, May 7, 2019.
25. Rappuoli R, Bloom DE, Black S. Deploy vaccines to fight superbugs. Nature, Dec. 12, 2017.
26. De Gregorio E, Rappuoli R. From empiricism to rational design: a personal perspective of the evolution of vaccine development. Nat Rev Immunol 2014;14(7):505-14.
27. Children’s Health Defense. Failure to vaccinate or vaccine failure: what is driving disease outbreaks? Mar. 6, 2019. https://childrenshealthdefense.org/...ne-failure-what-is-driving-disease-outbreaks/.
28. Cherry JD. The 112-year odyssey of pertussis and pertussis vaccines—mistakes made and implications for the future. J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc 2019 Feb. 22.
29. Lapidot R, Gill CJ. The pertussis resurgence: putting together the pieces of the puzzle. Top Dis Travel Med Vaccines 2016;2:26.
30. Cowling BJ, Fang VJ, Nishiura H et al. Increased risk of noninfluenza respiratory virus infections associated with receipt of inactivated influenza vaccine. Clin Infect Dis 2012;54(12):1778-83.
31. Flu vaccine paradox adds to public health debate. CBS News, Jan. 16, 2015.
32. https://www.fda.gov/media/74350/download.
33. Brewer NT, Moss JL. Dangers of vaccine refusal near the herd immunity threshold: a modelling study. Lancet Infect Dis 2015;15(8):922-6.
34. Kennedy, Jr. RF. MMR vaccine’s poison pill: mumps after puberty, reduced testosterone and sperm counts. Children’s Health Defense, Apr. 4, 2019. https://childrenshealthdefense.org/...uberty-reduced-testosterone-and-sperm-counts/.
35. https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/pinkbook/downloads/appendices/b/excipient-table-2.pdf.
36. Cowan T. Vaccines, Autoimmunity, and the Changing nature of Childhood Illness. White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green Publishing; 2018.
37. Bush Z. Disruption of the gut microbiome and gut permeability as ground zero for the nutrition-related epidemics of the developed world. Presented at the 13th International Congress on Advances in Natural Medicines, Neutraceuticals & Neurocognition, Rome, Italy, July 27-28, 2017.
38. Lange K, Buerger M, Stallmach A et al. Effects of antibiotics on gut microbiota. Dig Dis 2016;34(3):260-8.
39. Myers JP, Antoniou MN, Blumberg B et al. Concerns over use of glyphosate-based herbicides and risks associated with exposures: a consensus statement. Environ Health 2016;15:19.
40. Thomas S, Izard J, Walsh E et al. The host microbiome regulates and maintains human health: a primer and perspective for non-microbiologists. Cancer Res 2017;77(8):1793-1812.
41. Zumia A, Maeurer M, Host-Directed Therapies Network (HDT-NET) Consortium. Host-directed therapies for tackling multi-drug resistant tuberculosis: learning from the Pasteur-Bechamp debates. Clin Infect Dis 2015;61(9):1432-8.

 

[Juristic Person]

Can you “catch a virus” in the air?

Dr Kaufman says no....as do other medical professionals.

 

[arminius]

You can't catch a virus period. There are no, that is, no verifiable replicable studies of a virus being infective, even when healthy noninfected groups were spoonfed infected saliva.

 

[arminius]

The whole debate boils down to this:

Germ vs Terrain Theory – Which Do We Adopt To Be Healthy?

By Derek Henry

Posted Thursday, November 12, 2015 at 04:02pm EDT

In the Western world, we are desperately obsessed with killing things off that we feel can threaten our livelihood. Whether it is germs, terrorists, or the next door neighbour, we seek to eliminate anything that doesn’t agree with us rather than trying to maintain a healthy balance between desired and undesirable circumstances.

When it comes to our health, the Western world has largely adopted the germ theory, meaning we need to identify and destroy anything we deem as a foreign invader as it is directly responsible for causing disease. However, there is another theory called the terrain theory, which believes that it is not the “germ” that determines disease, but rather, the state of our internal health and its ability to maintain homeostasis in the face of “unfriendly” organisms.

Let’s look into each theory a bit further to determine which theory we should adopt when trying to be healthy.

Germ Theory

The germ – or microbial – theory of disease was popularized by Louis Pasteur (1822 – 1895), the inventor of pasteurization. This theory states that there are fixed, external germs which invade the body and are the direct cause of a variety of separate, definable diseases. If you truly want to get well, you need to kill whatever germ made you sick, and do whatever possible to make “sure” that you never allow a microbe to enter your body in the first place.

With this theory comes Western medicine and its tools and technology that treats the symptoms of an unfriendly microbe rooting itself in the internal environment, through things such as drugs, surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy. Taking it a step further, in order to try and avoid an infection in the first place, various vaccines have been introduced to attempt to keep the disease from invading our body in the first place.

The germ theory was partly shaped around Pasteur’s idea that the human body is sterile, meaning it is a blank slate devoid of any germs. With this notion in mind we could conclude that we have to combat germs all the time in every way possible, and that preventative measures through things like nutrition are basically useless.

So, if you are to closely follow the germ theory, you need to be vigilant against various types of infections through prevention (primarily vaccinations), and destruction (antibiotics, surgery, radiation, chemotherapy) of any external microbe that ever attempts or succeeds to get inside our body.

Anything else is basically fruitless against disease prevention.

Terrain Theory

The terrain theory was initiated by Claude Bernard (1813 – 1878), and later built upon by Antoine Bechamp (1816-1908). He believed that the “terrain” or “internal environment” determined our state of health. When the body is functioning in homeostasis, and immunity and detoxification is operating well, he claimed there was a healthy terrain which could handle various pathogenic microorganisms that inevitably are thrown its way.

In essence, he believed the quality of the terrain and the elements it faced determined an individual’s susceptibility to disease.

Bernard, Bechamp, and their successors, believed that disease occurs to a large extent as a function of biology and as a result of changes that take place when metabolic processes become imbalanced. Germs then become symptoms that stimulate the occurrence of more symptoms, which eventually culminate into disease. A weak terrain is naturally more vulnerable to external threats, so it needs to be built up through nutrition, detoxification, and by maintaining a proper pH or acid/alkaline balance.

For this and other reasons Bechamp argued vehemently against vaccines, asserting that “The most serious disorders may be provoked by the injection of living organisms into the blood.” Untold numbers of researchers have agreed with him.

So, if you are to closely follow the terrain theory, you may make yourself aware of various external microbes that could be harmful to our health and the gentle, non-toxic removal of them, but your focus is on building and maintaining the integrity of your inner terrain so that any external microbe that you may ingest does not morph into anything with serious implications to your health.

This means nutrition, detoxification, and mindset are key factors you consider important in disease prevention and elimination.

Pasteur Recants On His Deathbed

One of the most interesting twists in this battle for “disease prevention supremacy” primarily headlined by Pasteur and Bernard, is that Pasteur recanted on his deathbed over his entire life work, stating that “the microbe is nothing; the milieu is everything.” Another way of stating these words is that it is not the germ that causes disease, but the terrain in which the germ is found.

Another gentleman, Rudolf Virchow, father of the germ theory, stated in his later years, “If I could live my life over again, I would devote it to proving that germs seek their natural habitat–diseased tissues–rather than causing disease.”

So when you are considering your health plan, strongly consider the results we are seeing in a germ theory dominated health care system. Then decide whether you want to take that road, or follow those who are healthy that predominantly follow the terrain theory.

This author staunchly believes in the terrain theory and has removed many disease labels and symptoms from his life by completely following this theory and admonishing the idea of the germ theory. You can see the type of results he generated by re-establishing his terrain, here.

If you are also a firm believer that health of your terrain largely determines your overall health, and want to know how to master that environment so you can not only survive but THRIVE, check into this online holistic health program

 

[BarnacleBob]

THIS IS A MURAL HANGING IN THE DENVER AIRPORT. IT WAS PAINTED IN 1994.

TELL ME THIS ISN'T JUST WEIRD...HOW FAR IN ADVANCE DO [THEY] PLAN THIS STUFF??

 

[arminius]

Pretty obvious to some of the the concept of the infective virus has used for many years for medical control of the population, and this is a plan executed by some very influential weathy people for the sole purpose of population control.

 

[arminius]

Edited a few months later because the moron silvester I responded to in this post removed all his bullshit rhetoric attacking me in this thread.

********************************
In three posts YOU have been ignorant about chemistry, chiropractor doctors, and mask dynamics.

YOU don't know anything about me or my knowledge, except what you read here. Also YOU don't tell me what or how to do.

If you don't like of those options, GTFO.

 

[Bigjon]

You have very little knowledge and understanding of this topic. Stop getting information from those far out websites you go to. You need to first start with general chemistry then progress from there.

Why don't you post some erudite discourse that supports your position, instead of just throwing enough mud to hope some sticks?

 

[arminius]

Virus can 100% infect both prokaryote (bacteria) and eukaryotic (yeast, plant, human, monkey, cat etc.) cells. Every student that has taken a bacterial genetics lab course has proven this using phage lambda to infect Escherichia coli cells. Lambda infects E. coli cells, lyses (bursts) them, and thus produces plaques (or holes) on a lawn of E.coli. Phage are virus that infect bacteria. In a similar manner, it can be shown that virus can infect eukaryotic cells by growing cells in a dish and infecting with virus; the cells will burst and plaques will form. Electron microscopy has also captured images of virus infecting cells.

Rubbish. Totally specious reasoning. None of that has ever been translated from in vitro fantasys to verified in vivo infection.

This is exactly how the science and universities have been corrupted.

 

[Juristic Person]

Viruses are exosomes. Under an electron microscope, the SARS-CoV2 virus and an exosome look dimensionally and architecturally the same. It is very easy to view an exosome and call it a virus.

Covid-19, like the “seasonal flu virus” can be explained as being the symptoms of a seasonal purge of toxins. Dr Andrew Kaufman has featured in some intriguing videos recently where he posits some questions about germ theory and makes a case for exosomes being behind “viral” symptoms. Of course StasiTube is banning them as fast as they can sniff them out....which adds to his credibility.

 

[arminius]

Again response to the moron silvester I responded to in this post removed all his bullshit rhetoric attacking me in this thread.

He didn't last long and disappeared, which tells me he was just here to ape the current death pledges of the corporate state against us...

****************************

Then do it.

 

[arminius]

All fantasies projected to control the narrative. No true double blind studies behind any of them.

Exosomes are microscopic vesicles released by cells when that cell is touched, contacted by a foreign agent that the cell recognizes as foreign and possible dangerous. AKA poison. Exosomes are vehicles of repair for the cell which released them in order to control cellular damage / repair cell membranes as needed. Because these exosomes appear around a damaged cell, they are taken for the infective agent that caused damage to the cell, rather than the environmental poison that actually caused the damage.

This entire fraud process was formented during WW1, to cover the incredible environmental damage caused them and has been fake news since.

 

[arminius]

I don't even know were to start.

Because you can't.

In vitro works great for fantasy building. In vivo, not so much.

 

[Bigjon]

h ttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r7sF9tMJNhY

 

[arminius]

^^^ That was excellent. Thanks.

@ 13:52 Nobody in their right mind would say; "Your compost pile has an infection."


"The germ is nothing, the terrain is everything" Louis Pasteur, from his actual diaries. What a piece of work this moron was.

Reducing science to assumption.

HIV? Herpes? Rabies? Common cold? Warts? Smallpox? Chickenpox? Ebola? <All words of ART intended not to truly discover and heal, but to obfuscate in order to perpetuate fraudulent funding schemes.

^^^ Exactly what billy boy and fuckchi are doing today.

 

[arminius]

More on terrain vs germ.

Dr Lorraine Day

Virus & Germ Theory Is Just That

 

[arminius]

The True Story of the 1918 “So-called Viral Influenza” Pandemic
By Gary G. Kohls, MD
July 20, 2020

The 1918-19 bacterial vaccine experiment may have killed 50-100 million people

For over a century, various entities that are involved in the propaganda machinery that has been tasked by the powers-that-be to advance American patriotism and corporate profiteering have covered-up the truth about what actually started the epidemic of what became known as the “Spanish Flu”, successfully obscuring what was actually a shameful experiment perpetrated by the Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research – the uber-wealthy entity that started the American Medical Association and the School of Public Health at Johns Hopkins University.

For over a century, Americans have been led to believe that what was the true epicenter of the pandemic – US Army military bases – was actually the result of a Rockefeller Instutute vaccine experiment gone awry. The culprit vaccine, nicely documented by author Kevin Barry was perpetrated upon hapless military recruits at a variety of bases in the US. Spain had nothing to do with the epidemic, except for actually allowing its journalists to write about it.

The experimental vaccine was devised when the only vaccine that had ever shown any promise in preventing disease was the smallpox vaccine (which, when evaluated in retrospect, didn’t actually deserve credit for the disappearance of smallpox, since only a small minority of world citizens every actually received the vaccine.)

The crude experimental vaccine was intended to theoretically prevent bacterial (not viral) meningitis in soldiers, which had been a problem in past wars. Barry nicely documents the story that has been left out of the history books, ignored by the Mainstream Media, deleted from the Pentagon archives, and misrepresented by the pharmaceutical and medical industries, the NIH, the CDC, the NIAID and every corporation that seeks to profit from vaccinating as many infants, children and adults that they can. And that includes, of course, the widely discredited Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation that has spent hundreds of billions of dollars funding, founding and subsidizing corporations and other entities that promote universal vaccinations for whatever is proclaimed Big Pharma to be “vaccine-preventable disorders”)

A previous 4261 word Duty to Warn column can be accessed at various websites, including here.

Below are excerpts from the article that was written by author Kevin Barry, whose website is called First Freedoms.

_______________________________________________________________________

“During the war years 1918-19, the US Army ballooned to 6,000,000 men, with 2,000,000 men being sent overseas. The Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research took advantage of this new pool of human guinea pigs to conduct vaccine experiments.”

“During WW1, the Rockefeller Institute also sent its experimental anti-meningococcal serum to England, France, Belgium, Italy and other countries, helping spread the epidemic worldwide.”

“The Rockefeller Institute and its experimental bacterial meningococcal vaccine, contrary to the accepted mythology may have killed 50-100 million people in 1918-1919.”

“The crude anti-bacterial vaccine used in the Fort Riley experiment on soldiers was made in horses.”

“According to a 2008 National Institute of Health paper, bacterial pneumonia was the killer in a minimum of 92.7% of the 1918-19 Pandemic autopsies reviewed.”

“Clean water, sanitation, flushing toilets, refrigerated foods and healthy diets have done and still do far more to protect humanity from infectious diseases than any vaccine program.”

“In 1918, the vaccine industry experimented on soldiers…with disastrous results—but in 2018, the vaccine industry experiments on infants every day. The vaccine schedule has never been tested as it is given. The results of the experiment are in: 1 in 7 of America’s fully vaccinated children is in some form of special education and over 50% have some form of chronic illness.” The “Spanish Flu” killed an estimated 50-100 million people during a pandemic 1918-19.”

What if the story we have been told about this pandemic isn’t true? What if, instead, the killer infection was neither the flu nor Spanish in origin?

Newly analyzed documents reveal that the “Spanish Flu” may have been a military vaccine experiment gone awry.

The reason modern technology has not been able to pinpoint the killer influenza strain from this pandemic is because influenza was not the killer.

More soldiers died during WWI from disease than from bullets.

The pandemic was not flu. An estimated 95% (or higher) of the deaths were caused by bacterial pneumonia, not an influenza virus.

The pandemic was not Spanish. The first cases of bacterial pneumonia in 1918 trace back to military bases, the first one in Fort Riley, Kansas.

From January 21 – June 4, 1918, an experimental bacterial meningitis vaccine cultured in horses by the Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research in New York was injected into soldiers at Fort Riley.

During the remainder of 1918 as those soldiers – often living and traveling under poor sanitary conditions – were sent to Europe to fight, they spread bacteria at every stop between Kansas and the frontline trenches in France.

One study describes soldiers “with active infections (who) were aerosolizing the bacteria that colonized their noses and throats, while others—often, in the same “breathing spaces”—were profoundly susceptible to invasion of and rapid spread through their lungs by their own or others’ colonizing bacteria.” (1)

The “Spanish Flu” attacked healthy people in their prime. Bacterial pneumonia attacks people in their prime. Flu attacks the young, old and immunocompromised.

When WW1 ended on November 11, 1918, soldiers returned to their home countries and colonial outposts, spreading the killer bacterial pneumonia worldwide.

During WW1, the Rockefeller Institute also sent its experimental anti-meningococcal serum to England, France, Belgium, Italy and other countries, helping spread the epidemic worldwide.

During the pandemic of 1918-19, the so-called “Spanish Flu” killed 50-100 million people, including many soldiers.

Many people do not realize that disease killed far more soldiers on all sides than machine guns or mustard gas or anything else typically associated with WWI.

I have a personal connection to the Spanish Flu. Among those killed by disease in 1918-19 are members of both of my parents’ families.

On my father’s side, his grandmother Sadie Hoyt died from pneumonia in 1918. Sadie was a Chief Yeoman in the Navy. Her death left my grandmother Rosemary and her sister Anita to be raised by their aunt. Sadie’s sister Marian also joined the Navy. She died from “the influenza” in 1919.

On my mother’s side, two of her father’s sisters died in childhood. All of the family members who died lived in New York City.

I suspect many American families, and many families worldwide, were impacted in similar ways by the mysterious Spanish Flu.

In 1918, “influenza” or flu was a catchall term for disease of unknown origin. It didn’t carry the specific meaning it does today.

It meant some mystery disease which dropped out of the sky. In fact, influenza is from the Medieval Latin “influential” in an astrological sense, meaning a visitation under the influence of the stars.

 

[viking]

A lot of Youtube videos now missing in this thread...

 

[Juristic Person]

How many people received the “experimental” vaccine?

 

[arminius]

This is just the beginning...

Jul 2, 2020
“No one has died from the coronavirus”
Important revelations shared by Dr Stoian Alexov, President of the Bulgarian Pathology Association
Rosemary Frei and Patrick Corbett

A high-profile European pathologist is reporting that he and his colleagues across Europe have not found any evidence of any deaths from the novel coronavirus on that continent.

Dr. Stoian Alexov called the World Health Organization (WHO) a “criminal medical organization” for creating worldwide fear and chaos without providing objectively verifiable proof of a pandemic.

Another stunning revelation from Bulgarian Pathology Association (BPA) president Dr. Alexov is that he believes it’s currently “impossible” to create a vaccine against the virus.

He also revealed that European pathologists haven’t identified any antibodies that are specific for SARS-CoV-2.

These stunning statements raise major questions, including about officials’ and scientists’ claims regarding the many vaccines they’re rushing into clinical trials around the world.

They also raise doubt about the veracity of claims of discovery of anti-novel-coronavirus antibodies (which are beginning to be used to treat patients).

Novel-coronavirus-specific antibodies are supposedly the basis for the expensive serology test kits being used in many countries (some of which have been found to be unacceptably inaccurate).

And they’re purportedly key to the immunity certificates coveted by Bill Gates that are about to go into widespread use — in the form of the COVI-PASS — in 15 countries including the UK, US, and Canada.

Dr. Alexov made his jaw-dropping observations in a video interview summarizing the consensus of participants in a May 8, 2020, European Society of Pathology (ESP) webinar on COVID-19.

The May 13 video interview of Dr. Alexov was conducted by Dr. Stoycho Katsarov, chair of the Center for Protection of Citizens’ Rights in Sofia and a former Bulgarian deputy minister of health. The video is on the BPA’s website, which also highlights some of Dr. Alexov’s main points.

We asked a native Bulgarian speaker with a science background to orally translate the video interview into English. We then transcribed her translation. The video is here and our English transcript is here.

Among the major bombshells Dr. Alexov dropped is that the leaders of the May 8 ESP webinar said no novel-coronavirus-specific antibodies have been found.

The body forms antibodies specific to pathogens it encounters. These specific antibodies are known as monoclonal antibodies and are a key tool in pathology. This is done via immunohistochemistry, which involves tagging antibodies with colours and then coating the biopsy- or autopsy-tissue slides with them. After giving the antibodies time to bind to the pathogens they’re specific for, the pathologists can look at the slides under a microscope and see the specific places where the coloured antibodies — and therefore the pathogens they’re bound to – are located.

Therefore, in the absence of monoclonal antibodies to the novel coronavirus, pathologists cannot verify whether SARS-CoV-2 is present in the body, or whether the diseases and deaths attributed to it indeed were caused by the virus rather than by something else.

It would be easy to dismiss Dr. Alexov as just another crank ‘conspiracy theorist.’ After all many people believe they’re everywhere these days, spreading dangerous misinformation about COVID-19 and other issues.

In addition, little of what Dr. Alexov alleges was the consensus from the May 8 webinar is in the publicly viewable parts of the proceedings.

But keep in mind that whistleblowers often stand alone because the vast majority of people are afraid to speak out publicly.

Also, Dr. Alexov has an unimpugnable record and reputation. He’s been a physician for 30 years. He’s president of the BPA, a member of the ESP’s Advisory Board and head of the histopathology department at the Oncology Hospital in the Bulgarian capital of Sofia.

On top of that, there’s other support for what Dr. Alexov is saying.

For example, the director of the Institute of Forensic Medicine at the University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf in Germany said in media interviews that there’s a striking dearth of solid evidence for COVID-19’s lethality.

“COVID-19 is a fatal disease only in exceptional cases, but in most cases it is a predominantly harmless viral infection,” Dr. Klaus Püschel told a German paper in April. Adding in another interview:

In quite a few cases, we have also found that the current corona infection has nothing whatsoever to do with the fatal outcome because other causes of death are present, for example, a brain hemorrhage or a heart attack […] [COVID-19 is] not particularly dangerous viral disease […] All speculation about individual deaths that have not been expertly examined only fuel anxiety.”​

Also, one of us (Rosemary) and another journalist, Amory Devereux, documented in a June 9 Off-Guardian article that the novel coronavirus has not fulfilled Koch’s postulates.

These postulates are scientific steps used to prove whether a virus exists and has a one-to-one relationship with a specific disease. We showed that to date no one has proven SARS-CoV-2 causes a discrete illness matching the characteristics of all the people who ostensibly died from COVID-19. Nor has the virus has been isolated, reproduced and then shown to cause this discrete illness.

In addition, in a June 27 Off-Guardian article two more journalists, Torsten Engelbrecht and Konstantin Demeter, added to the evidence that “the existence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA is based on faith, not fact.”

The pair also confirmed “there is no scientific proof that those RNA sequences [deemed to match that of the novel coronavirus] are the causative agent of what is called COVID-19.”

Dr. Alexov stated in the May 13 interview that:

the main conclusion [of those of us who participated in the May 8 webinar] was that the autopsies that were conducted in Germany, Italy, Spain, France and Sweden do not show that the virus is deadly.”​

​

He added that:

What all of the pathologists said is that there’s no one who has died from the coronavirus. I will repeat that: no one has died from the coronavirus.”​

Dr. Alexov also observed there is no proof from autopsies that anyone deemed to have been infected with the novel coronavirus died only from an inflammatory reaction sparked by the virus (presenting as interstitial pneumonia) rather than from other potentially fatal diseases.

Another revelation of his is that:

“We need to see exactly how the law will deal with immunization and that vaccine that we’re all talking about, because I’m certain it’s [currently] not possible to create a vaccine against COVID. I’m not sure what exactly Bill Gates is doing with his laboratories – is it really a vaccine he’s producing, or something else?”​

​

As pointed to above, the inability to identify monoclonal antibodies for the virus suggests there is no basis for the vaccines, serological testing and immunity certificates being rolled out around the globe at unprecedented speed and cost. In fact, there is no solid evidence the virus exists.

Dr. Alexov made still more important points. For example, he noted that, in contrast to the seasonal influenza, SARS-CoV-2 hasn’t been proven to kill youth:

[With the flu] we can find one virus which can cause a young person to die with no other illness present […] In other words, the coronavirus infection is an infection that does not lead to death. And the flu can lead to death.”​

(There have been reports of severe maladies such as Kawasaki-like disease and stroke in young people who were deemed to have a novel-coronavirus infection. However, the majority of published papers on these cases are very short and include only one or only a small handful of patients. Moreover, commenters on the papers note it’s impossible to determine the role of the virus because the papers’ authors did not control sufficiently, if at all, for confounding factors. It’s most likely that children’s deaths attributed to COVID-19 in fact are from multiple organ failure resulting from the combination of the drug cocktail and ventilation that these children are subjected to.)

Dr. Alexov therefore asserted that:

the WHO is creating worldwide chaos, with no real facts behind what they’re saying.”​

Among the myriad ways the WHO is creating that chaos is by prohibiting almost all autopsies of people deemed to have died from COVID-19. As a result, reported Dr. Alexov, by May 13 only three such autopsies had been conducted in Bulgaria.

Also, the WHO is dictating that everyone said to be infected with the novel coronavirus who subsequently dies must have their deaths attributed to COVID-19.

“That’s quite stressful for us, and for me in particular, because we have protocols and procedures which we need to use,” he told Dr. Katsarov. “…And another pathologist 100 years from now is going to say, ‘Hey, those pathologists didn’t know what they were doing [when they said the cause of death was COVID-19]!’ So we need to be really strict with our diagnoses, because they could be proven [or disproven], and they could be checked again later.”

He disclosed that pathologists in several countries in Europe, as well as in China, Australia and Canada are strongly resisting the pressure on them to attribute deaths to COVID-19 alone:

I’m really sad that we need to follow the [WHO’s] instructions without even thinking about them. But in Germany, France, Italy and England they’re starting to think that we shouldn’t follow the WHO so strictly, and [instead] when we’re writing the cause of death we should have some pathology [results to back that up] and we should follow the protocol. [That’s because] when we say something we need to be able to prove it.”​

(He added that autopsies could have helped confirm or disprove the theory that many of the people deemed to have died of COVID-19 in Italy had previously received the H1N1 flu vaccine. Because, as he noted, the vaccine suppresses adults’ immune systems and therefore may have been a significant contributor to their deaths by making them much more susceptible to infection.)

Drs. Alexov and Katsarov agreed that yet another aspect of the WHO-caused chaos and its fatal consequences is many people are likely to die soon from diseases such as cancer because the lockdowns, combined with the emptying of hospitals (ostensibly to make room for COVID-19 patients), halted all but the most pressing procedures and treatments.

They also observed these diseases are being exacerbated by the fear and chaos surrounding COVID-19.

We know that stress significantly suppresses the immune system, so I can really claim 200% that all the chronic diseases will be more severe and more acute per se. Specifically in situ carcinoma – over 50% of these are going to become more invasive […] So I will say that this epidemic isn’t so much an epidemic of the virus, it’s an epidemic of giving people a lot of fear and stress.”​

In addition, posited Dr. Alexov, as another direct and dire result of the pandemic panic many people are losing faith in physicians.

Because in my opinion the coronavirus isn’t that dangerous, and how are people going to have trust in me doing cancer pathology, much of which is related to viruses as well? But nobody is talking about that.”​

We emailed Dr. Alexov several questions, including asking why he believes it’s impossible to create a vaccine against COVID-19.

He didn’t answer the questions directly. Dr. Alexov instead responded:

We also emailed five of Dr. Alexov’s colleagues in the ESP asking them to confirm Dr. Alexov’s revelations. We followed up by telephone with two of them. None responded.

Why didn’t Dr. Alexov or his five colleagues answer our questions?

We doubt it’s due to lack of English proficiency.

It’s more likely because of the pressure on pathologists to follow the WHO’s directives and not speak out publicly. (And, on top of that, pathology departments depend on governments for their funding.)

Nonetheless, pathologists like Drs. Alexov and Püschel appear to be willing to step out and say that no one has died from a novel-coronavirus infection.

Perhaps that’s because pathologists’ records and reputations are based on hard physical evidence rather than on subjective interpretation of tests, signs and symptoms. And there is no hard physical evidence that COVID-19 is deadly.


xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Rosemary Frei has an MSc in molecular biology from the Faculty of Medicine at the University of Calgary, was a freelance medical writer and journalist for 22 years and now is an independent investigative journalist. You can watch her June 15 interview on The Corbett Report, read her other Off-Guardian articles and follow her on Twitter.

Patrick Corbett is a retired writer, producer, director and editor who’s worked for every major network in Canada and the US except for Fox. His journalistic credits include Dateline NBC, CTV’s W-5 and the CTV documentary unit where he wrote and directed ‘Children’s Hospital’, the first Canadian production to be nominated for an International Emmy. You can follow Patrick on Twitter.

 

[arminius]

In fact. More evidence exists that no virus has ever been truly scientifically proven to cause disease than any evidence that any virus causes disease.

Prove me wrong.

Because you can't do it.

But please, no idiocy...

 

[arminius]

The Voluntary End of America Due to a Coronavirus Hoax
By Gary D. Barnett
August 5, 2020

Unemployment has surged to levels never before seen in this country, but not one politician has lost his job due to any lockdown. There were over 40 million job losses by the end of May due to government mandates, and this deliberately structured second phase plot will see that number continue to increase dramatically. Not only will many more lose their jobs, but also millions of those jobs will be lost permanently. How is it that those that created and implemented this fake pandemic, from the banking and corporate heads, the tax exempt foundations, the ‘health’ organizations and pharmaceutical companies, and the politicians that serve their interests, have been unaffected by this insanity? Why is it that the top tier of so-called elites and all the politicians are still employed and gaining great wealth while the rest of Americans are suffering and dying? What on earth is essential about a politician, and why are they living in the lap of luxury while this country is driven to hell?

“You [the peasant] yield your bodies unto hard labor in order that he [the tyrant or the state] may indulge in his delights and wallow in his filthy pleasures; you weaken yourselves in order to make him the stronger and the mightier to hold you in check.”
Étienne de La Boétie—“The Politics of Obedience: Discourse of Voluntary Servitude

The masses are certainly being held in check, and in fact, the state is getting more aggressive in its efforts to enforce all the draconian restrictions necessary so that it can continue to gain power. While multiple global agendas are being advanced, there is but one main goal; and that is to achieve total and complete control over humanity. That is the ultimate agenda sought, and it gets closer to fruition every single day.

What is imperative to understand, is that there is no real evidence to support that any deaths have occurred from any coronavirus supposedly linked or specific to what is being labeled as SARS-CoV-2. Because this supposed virus has never been properly isolated or reproduced, has never satisfied Koch’s Postulates, and no antibodies specific to this ‘virus’ have been identified, how can any of this brutal and murderous response by governments be justified? It cannot be justified, so those attempts to do so are based on nefarious lies and propaganda needed by the state in order to advance its plan for the takeover of the human masses.

We are in the midst of the most sinister period in our history, as the set-up for what has been labeled ‘Phase 2’ of this plot, if allowed to go forward, will guarantee that huge numbers of deaths will occur during this coming flu season. Those deaths will not be due to anything called Covid-19, but will be used by the perpetrators of this fraud to ramp up totalitarian rule in what has already been devastating for most all in this country. This is planned first-degree murder by the state, as every mandate that has been levied on the public causes harmful stress, ill health effects, and dramatically reduced immune system function. This will lead to record-breaking sickness and death, and all of it will be blamed on this coronavirus that has never been proven to exist. Wearing oxygen-stealing masks that cause multiple problems, isolating from family and friends, distancing, job loss, loss of identity, poverty, and mass fear mongering by the government and mainstream media will weaken this population to the point of being nearly defenseless against any and every possible sickness. The elderly will once again be the hardest hit initially, but as winter progresses, every age will succumb to more sickness than normal due to the state prepared conditions necessary to breed a health disaster.

Measures to keep people in line will continue to become more stringent, and more aggressive enforcement will occur. This escalation has already begun, and will only get worse as time goes by. As this flu season gets closer, stronger force will be used by the state in order to gain mass obedience. Those that resist will be targeted more and more, so that they can be marginalized and shamed into compliance. Once acquiescence by the herd is strong enough to offset the few that will never accept this madness, the next phase of this takeover, the vaccination phase, will be ready to launch.

Once the killer vaccination is said to be ready, there will be an initial voluntary mass acceptance, but the voluntary aspect of delivering this toxic concoction will change rapidly. At first, there will be adverse consequences for those not accepting a vaccination and getting an immunity certificate. Restrictions on movement, all travel, necessary daily duties such as shopping for food, and being in any public venue will be forthcoming, and eventually, access to banking accounts and investment assets could be limited by the state for any dissenters.

With a weak society purposely created by state lockdowns and isolation, vaccination by Gates and his cohorts will prove to exacerbate the already tenuous situation facing the general population. Vaccinating already weak individuals with inadequate immune response systems, especially with multiple virus strains and many unknown adjuvants and other hidden ingredients, will lead to much higher deaths, all of course attributed to Covid-19. Those responsible for creating this untested vaccine, and injecting it into hundreds of millions of Americans are completely exempt from monetary liability and prosecution due to any adverse effects evident. In other words, the pharmaceutical companies, the vaccine manufacturers, the ‘health’ organizations, and the government are all held harmless regardless of how many they murder.

The instability and chaos is just beginning, and it will continue to worsen. Rioting, looting, and property destruction will get worse, and it will spread. Food production and delivery will lessen, prices will rise, prosecution of those not willing to comply will increase, bankruptcies will become common, and increased suicide will become normalized.

In the midst of all this lunacy, a worthless presidential election will be held, and the risk of extreme violence and hatred will take center stage during the most destructive period of our existence. The results of this election are irrelevant concerning the problems we now face, but the red and blue sheep do not understand this truth. Regardless of the winner of this political circus, the rest of us will suffer for many years to come, and the state’s agenda of control will not cease. This tyranny will not end unless the people of this country in great mass say no more, and in doing so have the courage to face any obstacle in the way of regaining freedom.

“The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed (and hence clamorous to be led to safety) by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary.”

~ H.L. Mencken (2012). “Mencken Chrestomathy”, p.29, Vintage

 

[arminius]

This is the real virus...

 

[arminius]

 

[Silver]

I've never seen Mercola angry like this...