• Same story, different day...........year ie more of the same fiat floods the world
  • There are no markets
  • "Spreading the ideas of freedom loving people on matters regarding high finance, politics, constructionist Constitution, and mental masturbation of all types"

There's bad news about this year's flu vaccine

abeland1

Silver Member
Silver Miner
Site Supporter
Joined
Apr 2, 2010
Messages
195
Likes
289
#1
WEDNESDAY, Dec. 6, 2017 (HealthDay News) -- There's bad news about this year's flu vaccine.
The most common type of flu being seen in the United States is influenza A H3N2, the same severe strain that dominated last flu season.
And in Australia, where the winter flu season has just wrapped up, this season's vaccine was only about 10 percent effective against the H3N2 strain.
"Our vaccine is the same as the one used in Australia," said Lynnette Brammer, an epidemiologist in the influenza division of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. "The vaccine doesn't work as well for H3N2 viruses in general."

But she added that a 10 percent effectiveness rate still seems a bit low. Last year, a similar vaccine was 43 percent effective against the H3N2 virus and 48 percent effective overall, according to the CDC.

And Brammer added that other types of flu are circulating, including influenza A H1N1 and a couple of influenza B viruses. The flu vaccine is very effective against these, she noted.

Despite its low effectiveness, Brammer urges everyone aged 6 months and older to get a flu shot. Cut "The vaccine doesn't work as well for H3N2 as we would like, but does work for some and it may provide partial protection. And there are a lot of H1N1 and B viruses out there," Brammer said.
The flu is being seen throughout the country and is very active in the South and New England, but it's not too late to get vaccinated, she said. But H3N2 can be particularly hard on the elderly and the very young. Each year, hundreds of thousands Americans are hospitalized for flu and thousands die, according to the CDC.

If you do catch the flu, Brammer suggests taking antivirals such as Tamiflu to reduce the number of days you are sick. The drug works best when taken right when you get sick, so seeing your doctor early is a good move, she said.
The CDC also advises people to wash their hands often to prevent spreading flu, and to stay home if they're sick so they won't spread it to others.
It's too early to tell if H3N2 will continue to be the predominant strain or whether H1N1 will surpass it, Brammer said.
Usually, a H3N2 portends a severe flu year, but mild H3N2 years have also occurred, she said.
"The most predictable thing about flu is that it's unpredictable," Brammer said. Cut Dr. Marc Siegel is an infectious diseases expert from NYU Langone Medical Center in New York City. "It's a good guess that H3N2 will predominate, and that's worrisome," he said.
Still, "I believe it's worth getting the vaccine," Siegel said. "I believe there is a booster effect, although I can't prove that."
Having been vaccinated once against the various strains of the virus makes being vaccinated again even more effective, he explained. Cut Siegel added that he worries that "this could be a very severe flu season."
SUNDAY, Dec. 3, 2017 (HealthDay News) -- Even months after recovering from the flu, older people remain at increased risk for a heart attack, stroke or disability, a doctor who specializes in infectious diseases warns.
Latest Cold and Flu News
"We all know about the illness influenza causes -- obviously fever and making you feel poorly, aches and pains -- and that is because it sets up a systemic inflammatory response," said Dr. William Schaffner.
He's a professor of preventive medicine and infectious disease at Vanderbilt University School of Medicine in Nashville."Not as well known: In the two weeks to a month after you recover from influenza, you have a three to five times increased risk of having a heart attack," Schaffner said in a university news release. "You have a two to three times increased risk of having a stroke."Nobody wants a heart attack or a stroke, so by preventing flu, you prevent this inflammatory response and you can help prevent those strokes and heart attacks," Schaffner said.
Seniors account for more than half of flu-related hospitalizations caused by influenza and more than 80 percent of flu-related deaths, he said, so it's especially important for seniors to get a flu shot.
"We have a couple of vaccines now that are particularly designed and licensed for use in older adults, and that is because they produce an enhanced immune response in this population," Schaffner said. Cut Flu can have a domino effect in seniors.
"Influenza can take a person who is functional in society and make them very sick, but after they recover they may never get back to that same level of function that they had before," Schaffner said.
"Flu can be like that first domino falling and beginning to push patients down the disability scale," he said. Cut -- Robert Preidt
 

birddog

Gold Member
Gold Chaser
Site Supporter
Joined
Feb 28, 2011
Messages
2,601
Likes
3,194
#3
Can someone tell me how they prove, scientifically, the effectiveness of a yearly vaccine? Seriously. Immunity doesn't work in a vacuum, and actually works best IF YOU GET SICK AND FIGHT OFF A REAL ILLNESS!

I think they just pull those numbers out of there asses.

I have never had a flu shot and I have only had the flu 2 or 3 times in my life. I would say not getting the shot is pretty effective.
 

the_shootist

Molon Labe!
Midas Member
Sr Site Supporter
Joined
May 31, 2015
Messages
21,790
Likes
24,580
#4
Lets not mess around , I would like a double shot of the Special Senior vaccine...."particularly designed and licensed for use in older adults ..."...
The double shot will give me a better chance to die faster and suffer less.....
We at all the places who are pushing this poison frown on reduced suffering, it reduces the intensity of the experience!:belly laugh:
 
Last edited:

the_shootist

Molon Labe!
Midas Member
Sr Site Supporter
Joined
May 31, 2015
Messages
21,790
Likes
24,580
#6
Can someone tell me how they prove, scientifically, the effectiveness of a yearly vaccine? Seriously. Immunity doesn't work in a vacuum, and actually works best IF YOU GET SICK AND FIGHT OFF A REAL ILLNESS!

I think they just pull those numbers out of there asses.

I have never had a flu shot and I have only had the flu 2 or 3 times in my life. I would say not getting the shot is pretty effective.
3 words...

Smoke....
and...
Mirrors!

10% effective sucks even for the placebo for cryin' out loud. Are people really this dumb?
 

arminius

Gold Member
Gold Chaser
Sr Site Supporter
Joined
Jun 6, 2011
Messages
3,571
Likes
4,648
Location
right here right now
#7
Remember the flu virus was discovered in 1918, at least 40 years before we had the electron microscope, and therefore the capability to see and isolate a virus. It has a remarkable history.

Fake news has been around for a long time...
 

abeland1

Silver Member
Silver Miner
Site Supporter
Joined
Apr 2, 2010
Messages
195
Likes
289
#8
Remember the flu virus was discovered in 1918, at least 40 years before we had the electron microscope, and therefore the capability to see and isolate a virus. It has a remarkable history.

Fake news has been around for a long time...
The "Spanish" influenza pandemic of 1918–1919, which caused ≈50 million deaths worldwide, remains an ominous warning to public health. Many questions about its origins, its unusual epidemiologic features, and the basis of its pathogenicity remain unanswered. The public health implications of the pandemic therefore remain in doubt even as we now grapple with the feared emergence of a pandemic caused by H5N1 or other virus. However, new information about the 1918 virus is emerging, for example, sequencing of the entire genome from archival autopsy tissues. But, the viral genome alone is unlikely to provide answers to some critical questions. Understanding the 1918 pandemic and its implications for future pandemics requires careful experimentation and in-depth historical analysis.
https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/12/1/05-0979_article
 

solarion

Gold Member
Gold Chaser
Site Supporter ++
Joined
Nov 25, 2013
Messages
5,050
Likes
7,615
#10
Even setting aside their obviously conflicted motives...if the self proclaimed rocket surgeons at the CDC can't figure out what killed 50 million people a century ago...why TF should I consider them an authority on anything now?
 

TAEZZAR

LADY JUSTICE ISNT BLIND, SHES JUST AFRAID TO WATCH
Midas Member
Sr Site Supporter
Joined
Apr 2, 2010
Messages
12,443
Likes
20,425
Location
ORYGUN
#11
Can someone tell me how they prove, scientifically, the effectiveness of a yearly vaccine? Seriously. Immunity doesn't work in a vacuum, and actually works best IF YOU GET SICK AND FIGHT OFF A REAL ILLNESS!

I think they just pull those numbers out of there asses.

I have never had a flu shot and I have only had the flu 2 or 3 times in my life. I would say not getting the shot is pretty effective.
Spot on ! I stopped taking the poison back in the late 70's. Why would anyone purposely put poison in their blood ???

My big question is, how do they get a vaccine so quickly ?

Here is the answer !

3 words...

Smoke....
and...
Mirrors!

10% effective sucks even for the placebo for cryin' out loud. Are people really this dumb?
 

arminius

Gold Member
Gold Chaser
Sr Site Supporter
Joined
Jun 6, 2011
Messages
3,571
Likes
4,648
Location
right here right now
#12
How The Gardasil Vaccine Is Fast-Tracked, Flawed & Not As Safe As It’s Marketed To Be
By Helen Lobato
Collective Evolution

December 8, 2017

“It is a vaccine that’s been highly marketed, the benefits are over-hyped, and the dangers are underestimated”
– Dr Christopher Shaw from the University of British Colombia. (Take from the One More Girl documentary).

In Australia in the 1960s, children were given a total of five vaccines from early childhood to adolescence. Fast forward to 2017, and the full schedule includes over 50 injections. And the list of new vaccines keeps growing.

How many vaccines are enough? What is it going to take to put an end to this dated science that is making our children so sick?

In the near future I will be a grandmother again. New birth is a wonderful time ripe for celebration and happiness. Or it should be. But regrettably for so many of us now, the occasion is also one full of fear for the child and his or her future health. This is because our children and grandchildren are being given far too many vaccines and the result of this over-vaccination is skyrocketing rates of autism and other chronic health problems.

Our human bodies are wonderful and if subjected to a favourable environment including good food, clean water, and adequate housing, most of us will live healthy lives without needing medical intervention such as vaccines.

When my daughter Tamara was born, I was fortunate to have a sensible, down-to-earth mother who encouraged me to breast feed. This was 1971 when it was becoming fashionable for young women to ditch the breast and take up formula feeding. I happily followed her advice and never regretted it for a moment. Breastfeeding is natural, convenient, and more importantly, a perfect feed for baby — not just nutritionally, but replete with immunity, too.

Herd Immunity

This brings me to the subject of herd immunity — natural herd immunity. We hear our so-called health experts speak of the need for herd immunity in the context of vaccines. But herd immunity is not obtainable from vaccines. Vaccine-acquired protection from childhood infections does not last, whereas the natural infection with its fever and rashes extends immunity and is reinforced by others when they come down with the illness.

Before vaccines, herd immunity is gained in the following way. As a child before the age of vaccines, it was common for us to have infections such as measles, mumps, rubella, and chicken pox. A few days off kindergarten or school and then you were well again. We never heard of children having complications from the natural infection. When babies are breastfed, this natural immunity is passed on and protects them in the early months of life. Then when our children have measles, mumps, rubella, and chicken pox, the adult immunity to these illnesses is reinforced — this I think of as herd immunity.

Take the case of chicken pox, a mild infection. Before the current age of vaccines, chicken pox immunity among adults was regularly reinforced by the young around them who had the natural disease. In this way, elderly people, often susceptible to shingles, were protected from the painful and debilitating disease. This naturally acquired immunity is disappearing now that children are vaccinated for these mild childhood infections and everything else — even against influenza. Nature has it right, and a dose of a mild infectious disease makes us stronger.

In Australia today, penalties are strict and unforgiving for parents who do not choose to vaccinate their children.

Enrolment in childcare centres and kindergarten requires the federal vaccination schedule to be up to date. Certain government benefits are also withheld from parents who do not comply with this overburdened vaccination schedule.

Fear is a great motivator, and our media, at the behest of health departments and the pharmaceutical industry, have exploited the prospect of disease to such an extent that most of society thinks vaccines will prevent childhood disease and the rare death. Before the age of vaccines, there were around 10 cases of death from measles in Australia, and these sadly occurred in areas of poverty and disadvantage. Infectious disease deaths fell before widespread vaccination. Factors that resulted in reduced deaths were improved nutrition, sanitation, and hygiene.

Similarly, when we turn to the issue of cervical cancer and prior to the 2006 release of the first human papilloma virus vaccine, Gardasil, the media message was intense, and scarcely a day passed without a horrifying cervical cancer story accompanied by the promotion of an auspicious, imminent vaccine.

In my book Gardasil: Fast-Tracked and Flawed, I write about how this message reached an uninformed public, most of whom had never heard of this virus but were now anxiously waiting for a vaccine to become available as quickly as possible. Poverty and environmental factors such as smoking, poor diet, and even natural ageing were displaced as causation in favour of the human papilloma virus or wart virus.

How The Vaccine Was Fast tracked

In 2006 when the HPV vaccine Gardasil was licensed and marketed to young girls and women 9-26 years of age, the phase 3 clinical trials had not been completed. This meant that the benefits of the vaccine and any safety issues arising from it were not known. The time period from clinical trial to recommending the vaccine was only 4 years.

According to Dr Diane Harper, one of Merck’s HPV researchers:

most vaccines take 3 years to develop and then 5 to 10 more for universal acceptance. Merck lobbied every opinion leader, women’s group, medical society, politicians, and went directly to the people — it created a sense of panic that says you have to have this vaccine now.

Gardasil was fast-tracked by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) due to industry lobbying by the manufacturer Merck who in December 2005 submitted an application to the FDA for fast track approval. Shortly after in February 2006 Merck announced that Gardasil was to be given a ‘priority review’. Such an accelerated review is reserved for vaccines and other products that are urgent and for conditions where other treatment does not exist.

Did Gardasil fulfill this unmet need?

No it certainly did not. Cervical cancer is a rare outcome of HPV infection and in countries with cervical cancer screening programs cases of the disease and fatalities have more than halved and if a cancer is found early and treatment given, the 5 year survival rate is 72%.

But in spite of these facts the FDA review date was scheduled for June 8 , 2006 whereupon the first HPV vaccine was approved and recommended for all women aged between 9-26 years even though it had not been tested for the prevention of precursor lesions in females younger than 15 years of age.

Gardasil continues to be marketed and promoted to young girls and now boys for prevention against a disease they are most unlikely to ever get. There is no proof that HPV vaccines have ever prevented a single case of cervical cancer. But we do know there have been over 73,000 recorded serious adverse events after HPV vaccination along with hundreds of deaths.

We need to turn this around. There are many awful things happening in the world today, but this one could be stopped tomorrow if there were a will.

In the words of Dr Sherri Tenpenny,

True health cannot come from a needle. Injecting people with something to try to keep them well is a 200 year mistake.

Reprinted from Collective Evolution.
 

arminius

Gold Member
Gold Chaser
Sr Site Supporter
Joined
Jun 6, 2011
Messages
3,571
Likes
4,648
Location
right here right now
#13
Sherri Tenpenny warns parents about safety of vaccines in NaturalNews interview


Thursday, February 03, 2011
by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger
Editor of NaturalNews.com (See all articles...)

(NaturalNews) Are vaccines really safe and effective? More and more credentialed health professionals are beginning to question that assumption, and what they're finding out about the lack of real science behind theassumed safety and efficacy of vaccines is actually quite shocking.

Today, Dr Sherri Tenpenny speaks out in an interview with the Health Ranger, posted on NaturalNews.TV: http://naturalnews.tv/v.asp?v=4CD1FE39DDB898...

In that interview, Dr Tenpenny says,

"It seems as though the pharmaceutical industry looks at children as nothing more than a repository of their products, whatever those products are... whether they are a vaccine, an artificial coloring from the food industry, something in a pill such as a medication, and we see these kids, they're not healthy, they're pale, they just don't look healthy. And then the pharmaceutical industry paints these happy pictures that we have to keep vaccinating these kids to keep them healthy. And the pediatricians say because these kids are sick, we need to vaccinate them more!"

Dr Tenpenny also calls out the huge conflicts of interest across the vaccine industry and pushers of vaccination policies, saying:

"The money isn't really to be made in the vaccine industry. The money is made by Big Pharma with all of the drugs that are given to treat and address all the illnesses that are subsequent to the side effects of the vaccines."

"If we could cut vaccination by 90 percent and get everybody's vitamin D levels up between 60 and 80 [ng / dl], we wouldn't have this health care problem that we have to tax everybody to death to try to take care of people. People would be healthy."

About the underlying assumption that vaccines are a valid approach to health, Dr Tenpenny questions that, too, saying:

"True health cannot come from a needle. Injecting people with something to try to keep them well is a 200 year mistake."

Speaking on the executives of the vaccine companies who have knowingly released contaminated vaccines that harmed and killed innocent children, Dr Tenpenny says, "Some of them will go to jail. Because I'm sure that some of them know absolutely what's going on." She goes on to compare the behavior of the vaccine companies to ENRON.

Here's what else you'll hear about in this interview
• Why parents are waking up to the truth about vaccine dangers.

• Why vaccines are related to our epidemic of asthma and allergies.

• Why "vaccines are the backbone of the entire pharmaceutical industry" because they create lifelong disease requiring expensive medical treatments.

• How vaccines are made with 63 different chemicals that may pose a grave risk of harm to human health.

• Why there's no profit to be made in keeping people healthy, leading to the drug companies actually working to keep people stuck in a cycle of degenerative disease.

• Why infection and temporary illness is actually an important part of boosting long-term immunity and health.

• Why psychiatric drugs can cause young males to grow "man boobs."

• Why there have never been any legitimate randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies on vaccines.

Hear the full interview at:
http://naturalnews.tv/v.asp?v=4CD1FE39DDB898...

Learn more about Dr Sherri Tenpenny at her clinic's website:
http://tenpennyimc.com
 

arminius

Gold Member
Gold Chaser
Sr Site Supporter
Joined
Jun 6, 2011
Messages
3,571
Likes
4,648
Location
right here right now
#14
Why Parents Should Be Concerned About Gardasil 9 – It Will Be Given To 12 & 13 Year Olds In 2018
By Helen Lobato
Collective Evolution

December 21, 2017


*Before you start reading, it’s important to mention that we’ve published multiple articles as to why this vaccine is a concern, filled with evidence and science. Click here to read those.

Gardasil 9, the latest human papilloma virus vaccine, will be given to all Australian 12- and 13-year-old students beginning in 2018. The announcement that Gardasil 9 would replace the quadrivalent Gardasil was made by the Prime Minister at the North Bondi Surf Club.

That Malcolm Turnbull was involved in the ceremony surprised me, but clearly it illustrates the strong support the government has for the practice of vaccination. The spectacle is worth examining, firstly for the pageant itself and what it signifies along with the likely repercussions of this decision.

On a bright sunny day and surrounded by lifesavers from the local surf club, Malcolm Turnbull began the proceedings: “It is an extraordinary development, Australian medical science – it is, so many of those young boys and girls down there will be proofed throughout their whole lives from this virus that is of course the cause of cervical cancer and other cancers as well.”


Of course the choice of venue was deliberate. The news that a more potent HPV vaccine was now to be given to teenagers was announced at one of Australia’s most iconic beaches. Bronze surfers provided the important backdrop to Malcolm Turnbull as he purposely promoted the new human papilloma virus vaccine, claiming it was a vital new step in saving lives and “an example of the way in which we are keeping Australians safe and healthy, we are saving lives, the young lifesavers behind us, they’re getting ready to save lives on this beach.”

If the repercussions in the wake of HPV vaccines weren’t so tragic it would be comical. How can the Prime Minister have missed the fact that there have been at least 73,000 adverse events following the administration of the quadrivalent HPV vaccine, Gardasil, and that so many of these teenagers are still ill, and can’t go to school or play sport?

How can he talk about the value of ‘saving lives’ when he is endorsing this vaccine that is associated with thousands of adverse events leading to sustained illness in so many young people — people who were encouraged to have a vaccination for a disease they were most unlikely to ever get?

Nevertheless Turnbull’s ‘life saving’ announcement was praised by the media, who quoted the mantra of Suzanne Garland, the lead Australian author of a global trial published in The Lancet and funded by the drug’s manufacturer, Merck, which came to the unsurprising conclusion that the new HPV vaccine Gardasil 9 could prevent 90% of cervical cancers worldwide: “Here we have the additional five types, which means you have 93 per cent protection against cancer, so that’s an extra 23 per cent cover. It’s a real bonus, whereas we previously had protection for cancer-causing types, which were 16 and 18, which made up 70 per cent.”

It is incredible that the obvious conflict of interest, with the manufacturer funding studies into its own product, seems to have been entirely ignored in the hype surrounding the Gardasil 9 vaccine.

What Merck has done is fund a study into its own product. Buoyed by the claims of the study’s author, even though they are purely speculative, Merck is endeavouring to ensure that every Australian teenager is administered with Gardasil 9, by accessing the limited resources of the public health purse. And the government is right with them in their profit-making exercise.

What a lucrative business: Fund studies into your own products, talk up the results, and thanks to the newspapers of Australia and their blinkered journalism, sit back and watch the money roll in.

Gardasil 9 was approved for use in Australia by the TGA last year and is said to be protective against nine HPV types: 6, 11, 16, 18, 31, 33, 45, 52, and 58.

On the Gardasil 9 page of Merck’s website sits the slogan:

Your Child Could Be One Less At Risk For Certain HPV-Related Cancers And Diseases

This advertisement too is proudly placed next to healthy, smiling children, this time competing on the soccer field. Again the emphasis is on health and sport. And yet the truth about the vaccine is that it is not saving lives. On the contrary, most of these vaccine-injured teenagers also excelled at sport; were fine pupils and had bright futures before they were vaccinated with Gardasil.

One would have hoped that by now the HPV vaccinations programs would have been stopped, but instead we now have another — Gardasil 9, which contains even more of the aluminium adjuvent than the quadrivalent HPV vaccine Gardasil. One shot of Gardasil 9 has 500 mcg of this known neurotoxin. Girls and boys will receive two shots of the vaccine, bringing the total amount of aluminium injected into their young bodies up to 1000mcg. Gardasil and Gardasil 9 contain amorphous aluminium hydroxyphosphate sulphate (AAHS), used as an adjuvent to stimulate the immune system so that it produces antibodies. But the use of this new form of aluminium causes the immune system to become 104 times more powerfully stimulated than would occur naturally.

In “FDA approved Gardasil 9: Malfeasance or Stupidity?,” Norma Erickson has examined the Gardasil 9 package insert where she found that the rate of serious adverse events in the trials of Gardasil 9 was 2.3-2.5%. This means that for every 100,000 people who are given Gardasil 9, there will be 2,300 serious adverse events, and yet the cervical cancer rate in the U.S. is around 7 women per 100,000. Talk about insanity!

And that’s not all she found when she examined the insert package. During the trials, 2.4% of the recipients developed an autoimmune disorder, which means that 2,400 people could now be suffering from new diseases just because they had this new Gardasil injection. There was also bad news for women who became pregnant during the trials, in that 14.1% suffered adverse outcomes. Erickson notes that those who were in the quadrivalent Gardasil trials suffered similar and even higher rates of adverse outcomes of 17%. In all, 313 women either lost their babies to spontaneous abortion or late fetal death or gave birth to children with congenital anomalies.

The announcement by the Prime Minister of the availability of Gardasil 9 is evidence of the incredible importance the Australian government places on the practice of vaccination. In Australia, failure to have your child vaccinated according to schedule denies the child of a place in childcare and in kindergarten and penalizes the family by loss of certain family payments. It is therefore unsurprising that this announcement was made in the manner in which it was — in the midst of sun, warmth, youth, and health.

Also in attendance on this day at Boni Beach was co-developer of the first HPV vaccine Professor Ian Frazer who, at the height of the marketing campaign in 2006, was made ‘Australian of the Year.’ Obviously this announcement was a big deal. The public was meant to take notice, have its faith in science and medicine strengthened, and most of all, to take advantage of this free offer for its young teenagers.

Vaccination in Australia is non-negotiable. There is no public debate allowed, and yet, as Dr. Marcia Angell, a former editor for the New England Journal of Medicine has stated: “It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published, or to rely on the judgment of trusted physicians or authoritative medical guidelines. I take no pleasure in this conclusion, which I reached slowly and reluctantly over my two decades as an editor of The New England Journal of Medicine.”

We have a very compliant media compromised and neglectful in its duty to inform the public about the very real dangers of many facets of the pharmaceutical industry. Why is this so?

According to Stephen Tunley who has a daughter who was damaged after having the Gardasil vaccine, “Fact is that with a regulator (TGA) wholly funded by those it administers, with a Government in the thrall of big corporations, with media under the thrall of the political interests of its owners, with Universities and teaching hospitals reliant on funding from Pharma the issues do not get an airtime.”

But Malcolm Turnbull knows how to get airtime. His announcement that Australian teenagers will receive Gardasil 9 next year was on every television news service that night. But there was no questioning by the media about the effects of this decision. No one asked how many cases of cervical cancer this vaccine will prevent. The answer to the neglected question is that this vaccine has never prevented a single case of cervical cancer. And, after all Gardasil, was marketed as a vaccine to prevent cervical cancer.

Meanwhile the overstimulation of the immune system continues to damage our teenagers, resulting in the development of more dangerous allergies, especially asthma. Our teenagers in receipt of this vaccine are likely to be affected by autoimmune diseases and seizures, POTS or postural orthostatic tachycardic syndrome, gastrointestinal problems, heart disease, cancer, hair loss, depression, insomnia, and excruciating joint pain.

If the government really cares about good health and the sporting prowess of its teenagers, then the HPV vaccination program should be stopped immediately. There is no need for this vaccine. Cervical cancer can be detected by Pap smear screening. There is no epidemic of cervical cancer in Australia.

Reprinted with permission from Collective Evolution.