• "Spreading the ideas of freedom loving people on matters regarding high finance, politics, constructionist Constitution, and mental masturbation of all types"

TRUMP SEZ SEND "ILLEGAL ALIENS TO THE SANCTUARY CITIES" - I LOVE IT!!!

Joe King

Gold Member
Gold Chaser
Site Supporter
Joined
Mar 31, 2010
Messages
8,271
Likes
8,867
Location
Instant Gratification Land
#83
What's funny is you saying you've got stats to prove what you're saying, but when asked for them you try to say it's based on logic. lol


Controlling immigration at the border is super easy. It's one big lie that it can't be done cost effectively. The existing tunnel detection and desert patrol teams do a really good job and would do a PERFECT job ... IF THEY WERE FUNDED TO THE LEVEL THEY ASKED FOR !!!!
Yea, I remember you saying that for .1% of the cost of the wall that the border patrol could have a 100% apprehension rate. Ie: if they'd only spend $25 million more, that would fix everything. Never mind the fact that the border patrol already has a $4 billion dollar budget. Yea, an extra $25 mil would fix everything. lol


Why do people keep posting and saying "sanctuary cities" ??????
Because those cities protect illegals and make it easy for them to live there. What did you think "sanctuary" means? That they turn 'em in? lol
 

EO 11110

Trump: DAY ONE promise: DACA illegals gone
Site Supporter
Mother Lode
Joined
Jul 31, 2010
Messages
13,956
Likes
10,493
#84
chump isn't saying anything that hasn't been said FOR YEARS by our side. station buses at the borders -- load 'em up and drop them off in nyc and dc

the difference is that we, if given the chance, would actually DO it, not just use empty threats to posture for votes

wake me up when the first buses unload their cargoes in nyc, dc, san fran

i'll take the under. max bet
 

Strawboss

America...Love it...or GTFO
Gold Chaser
Site Supporter
Joined
Mar 31, 2010
Messages
4,301
Likes
6,975
Location
Metro Detroit area
#85
The wall is about more than just illegals coming here to work. The wall would seriously impede the flow of human trafficking of women and children for sex purposes. It would also make it appreciably harder for the drug smugglers to get their product here. Of course it wouldnt be 100% effective - but, it would definitely be a significant step towards solving the problem.

Of course no solution is 100% full-proof. Other measures such as dramatically increasing the number of drug sniffing dogs at border checkpoints and utilizing a variety of technologies is also important.

What the wall will enable is for the flow of people, drugs, etc... to be corralled at checkpoints where they can be properly processed/inspected...
 

Joseph

Gold Member
Gold Chaser
Sr Site Supporter
Joined
Jul 27, 2011
Messages
4,205
Likes
7,397
Location
south east
#86
Man, how long did it take you to find a meme this stupid ? All it takes is a cheap, liberal, SJW meme and you guys are collectively spazzing out, spanking your monkeys in a SJW circle jerk. You guys are sadly hilarious

Why are liberals so gullible?


The Democratic National Convention is a great time to reflect on the Conundrum of The Century: Why are our liberal buddies so amazingly gullible? Why do they fall for the most obvious scam artists? Why, when Hillary crashes, do they slobber all over the next edition of God's Anointed on Earth?

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2008/08/why_are_liberals_so_gullible.html
 

Silver

Gold Member
Gold Chaser
Site Supporter ++
Joined
Mar 31, 2010
Messages
4,504
Likes
6,788
#89
chump isn't saying anything that hasn't been said FOR YEARS by our side. station buses at the borders -- load 'em up and drop them off in nyc and dc

the difference is that we, if given the chance, would actually DO it, not just use empty threats to posture for votes

wake me up when the first buses unload their cargoes in nyc, dc, san fran

i'll take the under. max bet
They can drop them off anywhere they want, doesn't mean they will stay.
 

Silver

Gold Member
Gold Chaser
Site Supporter ++
Joined
Mar 31, 2010
Messages
4,504
Likes
6,788
#90
The wall is about more than just illegals coming here to work. The wall would seriously impede the flow of human trafficking of women and children for sex purposes. It would also make it appreciably harder for the drug smugglers to get their product here. Of course it wouldnt be 100% effective - but, it would definitely be a significant step towards solving the problem.

Of course no solution is 100% full-proof. Other measures such as dramatically increasing the number of drug sniffing dogs at border checkpoints and utilizing a variety of technologies is also important.

What the wall will enable is for the flow of people, drugs, etc... to be corralled at checkpoints where they can be properly processed/inspected...
The wall is a load of crap - if you build a wall along the Rio Grande, the source of water for wildlife for a thousand miles, you devastate your own ecology. And humans, cut off from water in the desert. What value is your property cut off from the most precious resource there is? What about imminent domain and private property? The wall is on our side, some distance from the boundary - with roads, patrols, outposts, etc., a police state for all near the border.
 
Last edited:

Silver

Gold Member
Gold Chaser
Site Supporter ++
Joined
Mar 31, 2010
Messages
4,504
Likes
6,788
#91
El Paso is a sanctuary city - 1000 a day are processed - then are bused out at night across the country, every day.
 

Joe King

Gold Member
Gold Chaser
Site Supporter
Joined
Mar 31, 2010
Messages
8,271
Likes
8,867
Location
Instant Gratification Land
#92
They can drop them off anywhere they want, doesn't mean they will stay.
If they are dropped off in a place that welcomes them and provides help to them, most will stay there.
 

Silver

Gold Member
Gold Chaser
Site Supporter ++
Joined
Mar 31, 2010
Messages
4,504
Likes
6,788
#93
If they are dropped off in a place that welcomes them and provides help to them, most will stay there.
Of course they would, but they won't really welcome them when they are flooded - the whole thing is Virtue Signaling to make themselves feel good. The well off residents will sell out and move...
 

TAEZZAR

LADY JUSTICE ISNT BLIND, SHES JUST AFRAID TO WATCH
Midas Member
Midas Supporter
Joined
Apr 2, 2010
Messages
14,934
Likes
26,181
Location
ORYGUN
#94
better idea is just to jail anyone hiring them and giving them jobs,
take away their welfare, the health care, all of it,
Scorp, I could not disagree more whole hardheartedly. It is NOT the responsibility of an individual or company to vet employees. It is the RESPONSIBILITY of the government to protect our borders & prevent illegal invasions, a.k.a. mercenary invaders.
What should really happen is to jail the "public servants" that are stealing our money & giving it to these unwanted mercenary invaders. We should immediately stop ALL federal money going to all sanctuary, cities, counties & states.
Also, we are spitting in the face of all the LEGAL immigrants that jumped through all the hoops to become an American Citizen ! What a shame !
 

Joe King

Gold Member
Gold Chaser
Site Supporter
Joined
Mar 31, 2010
Messages
8,271
Likes
8,867
Location
Instant Gratification Land
#95
Of course they would, but they won't really welcome them when they are flooded
That's the whole point of Trump saying this. He's bringing the left's hypocrisy into the light for all to see.

The leftists say they welcome more illegals, but only so long as they are shipped to someone else's backyard. Buncha f'ing hypocrites, every last one of 'em.
 

Merlin

Gold Member
Gold Chaser
Sr Site Supporter
Joined
Mar 30, 2010
Messages
2,633
Likes
3,463
#96
The wall is about more than just illegals coming here to work. The wall would seriously impede the flow of human trafficking of women and children for sex purposes. It would also make it appreciably harder for the drug smugglers to get their product here. Of course it wouldnt be 100% effective - but, it would definitely be a significant step towards solving the problem.

Of course no solution is 100% full-proof. Other measures such as dramatically increasing the number of drug sniffing dogs at border checkpoints and utilizing a variety of technologies is also important.

What the wall will enable is for the flow of people, drugs, etc... to be corralled at checkpoints where they can be properly processed/inspected...
Consider how our military protects our bases in hostile Middle Eastern countries. Walls, barricades, barbed wire fences. Patrols -- enough to guarantee that no one sneaks through. Well-trained big dogs too. And checkpoints. How well does that work for them? Pretty well, I'd say. Of course nowhere in the middle of a Hell hole is entirely safe. But our men can sleep at night.
 

Scorpio

Скорпион
Founding Member
Board Elder
Site Mgr
Midas Supporter
Joined
Mar 25, 2010
Messages
27,035
Likes
33,521
#97
Scorp, I could not disagree more whole hardheartedly. It is NOT the responsibility of an individual or company to vet employees. It is the RESPONSIBILITY of the government to protect our borders & prevent illegal invasions, a.k.a. mercenary invaders.
you big baby!
just because you were one of those overpaid business owners...............
:beer:

actually, your point is well taken, but that doesn't mean that a business doesn't have culpability here.
they actually encourage illegals, demand illegals, all in order to make their extraction more profitable.

meaning, in theory, maybe even my theory, a business should only be operating for the benefit of society as a whole as well as for their owners.

for instance, using your logic, then if a corp is puking up pollutants all over lake michigan, that is not the corps fault, but .govs for not policing them.

I disagree
 

FunnyMoney

Silver Member
Silver Miner
Joined
Apr 1, 2010
Messages
3,739
Likes
2,305
#98
That's the whole point of Trump saying this. He's bringing the left's hypocrisy into the light for all to see.

The leftists say they welcome more illegals, but only so long as they are shipped to someone else's backyard. Buncha f'ing hypocrites, every last one of 'em.
Who do you mean by "left" ? Are you talking about those Dims who control half of CONgress?

Those are not the left, those are the "social-crony side of the one party pretending to be a two party" system.

Thinking that the "capital-crony side of the one party pretending to be a two party" system has done or will do any better is simply a parrot of MSM, inside the matrix, debating.


Here's an example for you:

It's like this, you have a water problem, you have no water. You have a few jugs that hold water, but one of them has a hole about halfway down.

The Left says we should fill the problematic water jug with sand up to the hole, that way no more water will spill out.
The Right says we should fix the hole with steel and cement, so no more hole.
While they debate this topic....
And while you debate this topic...

I HAVE NOT WATER and just want a drink. I'm not asking to fill the whole jug, nor all the jugs, just looking for a drink.
But NO, first we must worry about this hole half way up in this one jug, So, once that's going on and everyone is distracted, I die of thirst , but that's just called collateral damage.


I'm not fooled by the left vs right propaganda. Obummer rounded up plenty of decent working people who lived in America since the age of a toddler AND Obummer let plenty of illegals into our nation in his 8 years.

Other than a few small changes at the margin, the Clinton, Bush, Obummer, Tramp policies are all symptom issue policies that never even get within 5000 miles of a root cause solution or the truth about what's really going on at the root cause level... what a wall really means, what the constitution really says or what immigration and employment in our nation really looks like.
Everything you've said is just parroting MSM talking points, as if the MSM has ever gotten anything right in the last 100 years.
 

edsl48

Silver Member
Silver Miner
Site Supporter ++
Joined
Apr 2, 2010
Messages
2,222
Likes
3,889
#99
Seems that they are loved here in Illinois. While it would be a disaster to do it here I would love to see it forced in the faces of my liberal neighbors.

Pritzker Tells Journalists 'We Need You'
By DANA VOLLMER 3 HOURS AGO
ShareTweetEmail

  • J.B. Pritzker becomes the second governor to speak before the Illinois News Broadcasters Association. He joins Otto Kerner, who met with journalists in 1964.
    JEFF SMUDDE / IPR / WGLT
Originally published on April 14, 2019 10:19 pm
Governor J.B. Pritzker held his largest press conference over the weekend — and he’s promising media transparency under his administration.
Speaking before more than a hundred journalists at the Illinois News Broadcasters Association’s annual spring conference in Normal, Pritzker said he’s committed to helping Illinois media tell the stories that matter.
Pritzker said mutual respect between journalists and elected officials is critical in the era of “fake news.”
“If we want our democracy to thrive, we must have a first amendment that thrives,” Pritzker said. “Those with political power must be extremely careful that when we disagree with what’s being said, we nevertheless fight for your right to get the information out.”



Illinois Public Media reporters questioned Pritzker about the lack of cooperation from some state departments, namely the Illinois Department of Corrections and Department of Human Services
Pritzker said he’s still hiring new staff after the Rauner administration — and that he’ll step in when government officials are unresponsive.
During his address, the governor also doubled down on his commitment to protect undocumented immigrants in Illinois.
On Friday, President Trump said his administration is “strongly looking at” releasing thousands of detained migrants into so-called sanctuary cities. But Pritzker’s calling his bluff.
“The president is a xenophobe and a racist...So when he makes threats like this, they’re upon that history,” Pritzker said. “The fact is we’re not going to ship 11 or 12 million people out of the country, no matter what Donald Trump says. I’m not going to let that happen in Illinois. It’s not going to happen in the United States.”
He said Illinois will remain open to immigrants, despite threats from the White House.
Pritzker is the second governor to address INBA journalists at a convention. . The last was Otto Kerner in 1964.
 

FunnyMoney

Silver Member
Silver Miner
Joined
Apr 1, 2010
Messages
3,739
Likes
2,305
Consider how our military protects our ....
The military, OUR military, kills OUR own soldiers.

They fly helicopters that aren't safe for a dog. They have already admitted that dozens or hundreds of our fellow young Americans have died due to lack of funding and lack of concern.

Our military kills civilians, women and children. They torture and steal and do evil things all around the world, many of them known and many of them still left to be discovered.

If you're looking to our military's war on Terror for solutions - a MIC industry which has killed and destroyed hundreds of thousands of lives, many of them American lives and American families, in Wars for Profit ("terror" part is propaganda) then you're looking in the wrong place.
 

Joe King

Gold Member
Gold Chaser
Site Supporter
Joined
Mar 31, 2010
Messages
8,271
Likes
8,867
Location
Instant Gratification Land

FunnyMoney

Silver Member
Silver Miner
Joined
Apr 1, 2010
Messages
3,739
Likes
2,305
All the idiots who try to say illegal immigration is not a problem.
Immigrants aren't stealing from me two-thirds of everything I earn. They are not slowly taking away my life, liberty, freedom, prosperity and wealth.

The toilet cleaners and strawberry pickers didn't send my children over to far away places to kill and get killed for banker profits.

Janitors and street sweepers didn't lie through their teeth to me about the hundreds of laws passed to take more of my freedoms away. Some of them may be illegal, but we are slowly becoming an enslaved nation of poor people because someone or some group of people are stealing one million dollars a minute from our workers, not because some illegal is earning 5 bucks an hour.
 

Joe King

Gold Member
Gold Chaser
Site Supporter
Joined
Mar 31, 2010
Messages
8,271
Likes
8,867
Location
Instant Gratification Land
Maybe a few percent will. But most will go their previously planned destination location which is family already inside the nation, spread out around the nation.
Then drop them off and put immigration checkpoints all around those cities in order to catch them when they try leaving. Any get caught, send 'em back in.


The point is that those running the so-called sancutary cities want to protect the illegals. So I say let 'em do exactly that.
....but when that exact thing is proposed, they back peddle on it because the truth is that they don't want them either. Ie: they're a bunch of hypocrites that need to be exposed and Trump is doing exactly that.
 

Joe King

Gold Member
Gold Chaser
Site Supporter
Joined
Mar 31, 2010
Messages
8,271
Likes
8,867
Location
Instant Gratification Land
Immigrants aren't stealing from me two-thirds of everything I earn.
That's a different problem.
....and no one is stealing anything from you. You choose to pay it via your own voluntary actions.
 

FunnyMoney

Silver Member
Silver Miner
Joined
Apr 1, 2010
Messages
3,739
Likes
2,305
Most of these people, once dropped off inside our notion, will go their previously planned destination location which is family already inside the nation, spread out around the nation.

What the POTUS said is the same as: "release them into our nation."

Releasing them into some particular city = Releasing them into our nation.

If 20% or if 80% move to somewhere else within the first year of being dropped off inside the nation - that rate is moot. This is because over time that rate will increase. Simple math.,..


Releasing them into some particular city = Releasing them into our nation.
 

ABC123

Silver Member
Silver Miner
Site Supporter
Joined
Apr 10, 2010
Messages
2,167
Likes
3,614
Philly mayor gets HAMMERED by people who remember his ‘sanctuary city happy dance’ in light of this AWFUL news

https://twitchy.com/dougp-3137/2018/08/08/you-should-be-charged-philly-mayor-gets-hammered-by-people-who-remember-his-sanctuary-city-happy-dance-in-light-of-this-awful-news/

1555350544209.png
 

Joe King

Gold Member
Gold Chaser
Site Supporter
Joined
Mar 31, 2010
Messages
8,271
Likes
8,867
Location
Instant Gratification Land
Releasing them into our nation.
The point is that the gov is already forced to do that, but where they are released is still a choice. When it becomes their cities, the leftists suddenly cry foul. Why? They said they love illegals and want to protect them. So why do they say it's not fair to release them in sanctuary cities?


Are you truly incapable of seeing their hypocrisy for what it is?
 

Libertaurum

Freedom First
Platinum Bling
Joined
Apr 2, 2010
Messages
4,248
Likes
3,097
Immigrants aren't stealing from me two-thirds of everything I earn. They are not slowly taking away my life, liberty, freedom, prosperity and wealth.

The toilet cleaners and strawberry pickers didn't send my children over to far away places to kill and get killed for banker profits.

Janitors and street sweepers didn't lie through their teeth to me about the hundreds of laws passed to take more of my freedoms away. Some of them may be illegal, but we are slowly becoming an enslaved nation of poor people because someone or some group of people are stealing one million dollars a minute from our workers, not because some illegal is earning 5 bucks an hour.
Well said. Unfortunately, it seems we're approaching the point where reasoning is no longer possible, at least when it comes to this issue. People's emotions are running wild and dictate their positions.
 

Joe King

Gold Member
Gold Chaser
Site Supporter
Joined
Mar 31, 2010
Messages
8,271
Likes
8,867
Location
Instant Gratification Land
They are not slowly taking away my life, liberty, freedom, prosperity and wealth.
Many thousands of their victims would tend to differ.


crime.png
 

FunnyMoney

Silver Member
Silver Miner
Joined
Apr 1, 2010
Messages
3,739
Likes
2,305
Regardless where you release them, they can and will move onto their previously planned destination.

Releasing into Sanctuary Cities is the same as simply releasing.
Release them into a particular city = Releasing them into the nation.

He could have simply tweeted, "I will release them, let they people go, and btw we'll have the bus drop them off in LA."

He could have even made a song about the place, just like all the other famous people have.

I don't think our POTUS thought this one through. I'm not sure if our POTUS has the ability to think.
 

Joe King

Gold Member
Gold Chaser
Site Supporter
Joined
Mar 31, 2010
Messages
8,271
Likes
8,867
Location
Instant Gratification Land
I don't think our POTUS thought this one through. I'm not sure if our POTUS has the ability to think.
So why do the open border leftists freaking out about him merely suggesting that they be released in those cities? They are on record as saying they want to help them and to protect them. Based on their previous statements, those places should be happy to get more of them.
 

Silver

Gold Member
Gold Chaser
Site Supporter ++
Joined
Mar 31, 2010
Messages
4,504
Likes
6,788
That's the whole point of Trump saying this. He's bringing the left's hypocrisy into the light for all to see.

The leftists say they welcome more illegals, but only so long as they are shipped to someone else's backyard. Buncha f'ing hypocrites, every last one of 'em.
Including Trump, because he isn't really going to do anything more than push people's buttons and play showman. Illegal immigration and asylum seekers are at peak numbers - if he was serious, it would have happened long ago, this is not the first time he has said this about sending illegals to sanctuary states and cities. He always qualifies by saying he is thinking about it, considering it. Even when he says flat out he going to do something, he often backs off. I love his rhetoric though, he knows how to play people like a fiddle - but don't expect more than a little rhetorical excitement.
 

Joe King

Gold Member
Gold Chaser
Site Supporter
Joined
Mar 31, 2010
Messages
8,271
Likes
8,867
Location
Instant Gratification Land
Including Trump, because he isn't really going to do anything more than push people's buttons and play showman. Illegal immigration and asylum seekers are at peak numbers - if he was serious, it would have happened long ago, this is not the first time he has said this about sending illegals to sanctuary states and cities. He always qualifies by say he is thinking about it, considering it. Even when he says flat out he going to do something, he often backs off. I love his rhetoric though, he knows how to play people like a fiddle - but don't expect more than a little rhetorical excitement.
His intent is to expose the hypocrites for what they are. IMO it's working. All the ones who previously came out in favor of protecting illegals in sanctuary cities are now saying, whoa now, hold on here a minute. We didn't really mean that.
.
...and it makes the ones who said that crap look like a buncha idiots. lol
 

spinalcracker

On a mail train.
Silver Miner
Site Supporter ++
Joined
Apr 1, 2010
Messages
2,362
Likes
6,687
Location
On a mail train.
Irons,

was putting in some new quartz countertops,
ordered from my cabinet supplier

when it came time to put them in, they sent out 2 guys, both mexican, one semi spoke spanglish, and the other not a word.

were they illegal?

anyway, haven't paid the guy his final bill yet as it is a discussion he is going to be forced to have

-who authorized illegals to come on my property?
-why is the price not reflected accordingly?
-why wasn't I informed prior that this was the gig?
etc.

then to top it off, they dinged the new cabinets installing, as well as left a mess on the concrete and walls on the garage from cutting the stuff. That stone dust is not washing off, and will have to repaint those areas.

I am going to ask him for the exact company name of this supplier and maybe send out a hey up to ICE.
The cabinet guy brags on this supplier and his wiz bang technology to source and cut the stuff, etc.

What would have happened if once you were aware that something was fishy , stopped the work , told the Mexicans to vaminose while you called the contractor to find out what’s up.

If you find out that the Mexicans were indeed illegal , will you tear out the work they’ve already done?.....

Me?...I don’t really give a fvck one way or the other , I’ve been supporting crime from the very first dishwashing job I had in 1968......
 

Silver

Gold Member
Gold Chaser
Site Supporter ++
Joined
Mar 31, 2010
Messages
4,504
Likes
6,788
His intent is to expose the hypocrites for what they are. IMO it's working. All the ones who previously came out in favor of protecting illegals in sanctuary cities are now saying, whoa now, hold on here a minute. We didn't really mean that.
What difference does it make? If policies don't change, Twitter trolling means nothing. Just like the Iraq War, 90% of the population was against going in and occupying Iraq, but it happened anyway. Words don't matter, actions speak - fk the emotion playing of the people.
 

Joe King

Gold Member
Gold Chaser
Site Supporter
Joined
Mar 31, 2010
Messages
8,271
Likes
8,867
Location
Instant Gratification Land
What would have happened if once you were aware that something was fishy , stopped the work , told the Mexicans to vaminose while you called the contractor to find out what’s up.
Or what if ya find out they're legit and you end up being accused of racism?

That's the problem with coming down too hard on employers. If the guy shows up with all the proper looking documents and you still ask him to prove he ain't illegal because you think he is, you're guilty of discrimination if the guy is in fact legal.

Edited to add: if they hold foreign-looking people to a higher standard in the hiring process, they'll get sued.
 

Joe King

Gold Member
Gold Chaser
Site Supporter
Joined
Mar 31, 2010
Messages
8,271
Likes
8,867
Location
Instant Gratification Land
What difference does it make? If policies don't change, Twitter trolling means nothing. Just like the Iraq War, 90% of the population was against going in and occupying Iraq, but it happened anyway. Words don't matter, actions speak - fk the emotion playing of the people.
Before they'll turn away, the People have to see that those they've placed their trust in, are actually hypocritical scum. That's what Trump is exposing in his opponents.
 

Son of Gloin

Certainty of death? What are we waiting for?
Gold Chaser
Midas Supporter
Joined
Apr 6, 2010
Messages
5,810
Likes
12,171
Location
USA
Trump Magic – Cher Tweets Ultimate NIMBY Message…
Posted on April 14, 2019by sundance

Well, he called them out. President Trump knew if he supported a program to resettle illegal aliens in sanctuary cities, the hypocrisy of the left would come out… and boy was he right.
The champion for Hollywood’s far-left resistance movement, actress and singer Cher, jumps into action and sends the ultimate NIMBY (not in my back yard) message:


(link)



My twitter has become so powerful that I can actually make my enemies tell the truth.
23.9K people are talking about this

.
Troll level: Off the freakin' charts


Share this:
The Blue Collar Logic guy’s, Dave and Jason on YT, did a video on this just today or yesterday. Their point is that many of these homeless people are homeless because California is importing cheap labor to replace indigenous Californians, who can’t find work. Add to that the absolutely insane housing market in CA and you have an incredible homeless population. Yet, California’s elected moron class insists on sanctuary state status for California, displacing resident American workers and driving debt up to unsustainable levels, expecting the rest of the country to bail them out of their self made mess. Just suggest to them that “Hey! We can give you all those illegal immigrants you claim to love and want,” and they go ballistic and call you hateful and vengeful, using human beings as political pawns. They lie. They lie and they lie some more. It’s all politics to them, until you call them on their multiple layers of lies.
 

southfork

Mother Lode Found
Mother Lode
Site Supporter ++
Joined
Mar 31, 2010
Messages
16,041
Likes
15,110
They should charge any .gov official who releases illegals contrary to law with a identical crime as the illegal committed aiding and abetting also
 

Joe King

Gold Member
Gold Chaser
Site Supporter
Joined
Mar 31, 2010
Messages
8,271
Likes
8,867
Location
Instant Gratification Land
They should charge any .gov official who releases illegals contrary to law with a identical crime as the illegal committed aiding and abetting also
That's just it. Releasing them is not against the law. In fact, the law says they have to.