• "Spreading the ideas of freedom loving people on matters regarding high finance, politics, constructionist Constitution, and mental masturbation of all types"

VOTE FRAUD THREAD

ABC123

Platinum Bling
Platinum Bling
Site Supporter ++
Joined
Apr 10, 2010
Messages
4,831
Likes
8,932
#81
Judge limits Gov. Newsom's emergency rule-making

SACRAMENTO, Calif. —
A California judge on Friday sided with Republican legislators who said Gov. Gavin Newsom overstepped his powers with dozens of emergency orders during the coronavirus crisis that changed everything from how public meetings are conducted to when tenants can be evicted.
Sutter County Superior Court Judge Perry Parker only halted one of the orders, involving the November election, but ordered Newsom to refrain from new orders that might be interpreted as usurping the Legislature's responsibilities.
The judge appeared to adopt without changes a proposed order submitted to him by GOP Assemblymen James Gallagher and Kevin Kiley, who challenged the election order.

Parker barred Newsom “from further exercising any legislative powers in violation of the California Constitution and applicable statute, specifically from unilaterally amending, altering, or changing existing statutory law or making new statutory law.” He scheduled a hearing for June 26 to consider issuing a preliminary injunction.
“This is a victory for separation of powers,” the lawmakers said in a joint statement. “The governor has continued to brazenly legislate by fiat without public input and without the deliberative process provided by the Legislature. Today the judicial branch finally gave him the check that was needed and that the Constitution requires.”

Erwin Chemerinsky, dean of the law school at the University of California, Berkeley, said the judge's order “says only that the governor cannot issue orders that violate the law.”
“The paragraph in the order is vague, but I think it clearly does not forbid all executive orders, just those that are unconstitutional or violate statutes,” he said.

https://www.kcra.com/article/judge-limits-gov-newsoms-emergency-rule-making/32855863
 

ABC123

Platinum Bling
Platinum Bling
Site Supporter ++
Joined
Apr 10, 2010
Messages
4,831
Likes
8,932
#82
From the New York Post:

Louisville will only have one polling place open for today’s election

LOUISVILLE, Ky. — With only one polling place designated for Louisville on Tuesday, voters who didn’t cast mail-in ballots or show up early could face long lines in Kentucky’s primary election, the latest to unfold in a pandemic that has triggered unprecedented election disruptions across the country

Moar: https://nypost.com/2020/06/23/louisville-will-have-only-one-polling-place-open-for-tuesday-election/?utm_campaign=iphone_nyp&utm_source=mail_app
 

WillA2

Silver Member
Silver Miner
Site Supporter
Joined
Dec 16, 2019
Messages
1,031
Likes
2,366
#84
I Kentucky, this is a demonrat attempt to measure just how far the people are willing to be pushed and to get their system in place to rig the general election in November. Kentucky has a weak, corrupt governor.
 

Fatrat

Silver Member
Silver Miner
Site Supporter
Joined
Apr 15, 2018
Messages
5,056
Likes
5,294
#85
I Kentucky, this is a demonrat attempt to measure just how far the people are willing to be pushed and to get their system in place to rig the general election in November. Kentucky has a weak, corrupt governor.
You missed bigtime, the Republicans allowed only one polling place for 600,000 black people, Louisville is the major black area..
 

Agavegirl1

Silver Miner
Platinum Bling
Midas Supporter ++
Joined
Jan 23, 2013
Messages
1,537
Likes
4,277
Location
Somewhere in the midwest
#86
From: Powerline by John Hinderaker published June 22, 2020

HOW THE DEMOCRATS COLLUDE TO ENABLE VOTER FRAUD
One of the most pernicious phenomena of modern times is the collusive lawsuit. This is how it works: a left-wing organization sues a government agency that is also controlled by the left. The lawsuit alleges that the agency is obliged to do something that the agency would like to do, but the Democrats can’t get it passed. Then the parties–supposedly adverse, but actually in collusion–“settle” the case by having the agency agree to do what it wanted to do all along. If all goes well, a court enters an order enforcing the settlement. So the net effect is that a policy that the Democrats couldn’t get passed is now a court-ordered mandate. This happens often.
In Minnesota, Democrats are colluding to enable voter fraud in the upcoming primary election. This presumably is a warmup for the same effort they will make to enable fraud in the general election in November. With many believing that President Trump has a good chance to carry Minnesota after coming close last time, the Democrats are taking no chances.
The case is League of Women Voters v. Simon. The League of Women Voters, a solidly Democratic organization, is “suing” Minnesota’s Secretary of State, left-wing activist Steve Simon. The lawsuit seeks to suspend Minnesota’s election laws, ostensibly on account of COVID-19, so that persons mailing in absentee ballots won’t need to satisfy the statutory requirement of a witness to verify their identity. Without that requirement, voter fraud will be even easier than it is at present. If a Democrat finds a ballot lying around, as will happen many thousands of times in Minnesota, where the voter rolls include hundreds of thousands of names that are dead or otherwise not eligible voters, he can fill it out and send it in, no questions asked.
Democratic Secretary of State Steve Simon, who consistently abuses his office to facilitate voter fraud, quickly agreed to the “settlement” that his party wanted.
If you think this is a scandal, you are right. Happily, the Trump presidential campaign and Minnesota’s Republican Party hired excellent lawyers to intervene in the case and seek to block the proposed “settlement.” I have embedded their Opposition to the Proposed Consent Decree below. Here are a few quotes that demonstrate how the Democrats tried to achieve an illegal result by “settling” a collusive lawsuit.
This voter fraud effort is part of a nationwide campaign:
Democrats now contend that, in light of COVID-19, their legislative agenda is required by the Constitution. The Democratic Party (through its law firm, Perkins Coie) has filed COVID-19 lawsuits in virtually every swing State, including Minnesota. See Where We’re Litigating, Democracy Docket, bit.ly/2V0rF7k. Allied groups have bolstered the Democrats’ effort by filing dozens of copycat suits across the country. For example, the League of Women Voters brought this suit in federal court, while the Alliance for Retired Americans (backed by the Democratic Party) and the NAACP (backed by the ACLU) brought overlapping lawsuits in state court.​
The good news: “When these COVID-19 lawsuits face adversarial litigation, they usually fail.” Many citations at the link. This is why a collusive “settlement” is the easiest path to voter fraud.
In this case, the fraudulence of the “settlement” is obvious:
Defendant [the Secretary of State] filed an answer on June 9, 2020. Doc. 22. In it, he denied all Plaintiffs’ material allegations. Doc. 22 ¶¶7, 12, 62, 65, 80, 81, 87, 95, 100, 102, 109, 111. He also denied that heightened scrutiny applied to the witness requirement and argued that the requirement would survive any level of judicial scrutiny. [The cases cited by Intervenors indicate that this is clearly correct.] Doc. 22 ¶¶106, 107. And he asserted that Plaintiffs failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. Doc. 22 at 40.​
All of which were sound legal arguments, as the many cases cited in the Intervenors’ brief show. But the Secretary of State gave away the store, on purpose:
At some point in the next seven days, Defendant made a sharp U-turn. On June 16, the parties jointly submitted a proposed consent decree to the Court. Under that decree, Defendant would totally refrain from enforcing the witness requirement and concede to all four kinds of relief that Plaintiffs sought for the August primary. Doc. 24 at 6. Further, Defendant would concede that “Plaintiffs made a sufficiently strong showing on the merits of the claim”—a position directly contrary to the one he took in his answer a week earlier. Doc. 24 ¶20.​
In short, Minnesota’s Democratic Secretary of State colluded with a Democratic plaintiff to rewrite Minnesota’s election laws to facilitate voter fraud for the benefit of the Democratic Party.
The Democrats’ motion to approve their collusive settlement will be argued in federal court tomorrow. Given the overwhelming authorities cited in the Intervenors’ brief, I assume the judge will disapprove the settlement. But this is an excellent example of the evils of collusive litigation. It is a huge problem that can be mitigated only to the extent that the courts are not controlled by Democrats.

Link: https://www.powerlineblog.com/archi...OSXDaeRC46qC2J5P9HSbQmwYnpykSYGGb5fDNeQM64eJA
 

WillA2

Silver Member
Silver Miner
Site Supporter
Joined
Dec 16, 2019
Messages
1,031
Likes
2,366
#87
You missed bigtime, the Republicans allowed only one polling place for 600,000 black people, Louisville is the major black area..
Same thing in their next most populous county, Fayette. And that would be the governor leading the way.
 

EO 11110

CENSORSHIP KILLS
Mother Lode
Site Supporter ++
Joined
Jul 31, 2010
Messages
16,422
Likes
14,011
Location
clown world
#88
1592940003890.png
 

ABC123

Platinum Bling
Platinum Bling
Site Supporter ++
Joined
Apr 10, 2010
Messages
4,831
Likes
8,932
#89
28 Million Mail-In Ballots Went Missing in Last Four Elections





28 Million Mail-In Ballots Went Missing in Last Four Elections

.By Mark HemingwayApril 24, 2020





Between 2012 and 2018, 28.3 million mail-in ballots remain unaccounted for, according to data from the federal Election Assistance Commission. The missing ballots amount to nearly one in five of all absentee ballots and ballots mailed to voters residing in states that do elections exclusively by mail.



States and local authorities simply have no idea what happened to these ballots since they were mailed – and the figure of 28 million missing ballots is likely even higher because some areas in the country, notably Chicago, did not respond to the federal agency’s survey questions. This figure does not include ballots that were spoiled, undeliverable, or came back for any reason.



https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2020/04/24/28_million_mail-in_ballots_went_missing_in_last_four_elections_143033.html#!
 

WillA2

Silver Member
Silver Miner
Site Supporter
Joined
Dec 16, 2019
Messages
1,031
Likes
2,366
#90
28 Million Mail-In Ballots Went Missing in Last Four Elections





28 Million Mail-In Ballots Went Missing in Last Four Elections

.By Mark HemingwayApril 24, 2020





Between 2012 and 2018, 28.3 million mail-in ballots remain unaccounted for, according to data from the federal Election Assistance Commission. The missing ballots amount to nearly one in five of all absentee ballots and ballots mailed to voters residing in states that do elections exclusively by mail.



States and local authorities simply have no idea what happened to these ballots since they were mailed – and the figure of 28 million missing ballots is likely even higher because some areas in the country, notably Chicago, did not respond to the federal agency’s survey questions. This figure does not include ballots that were spoiled, undeliverable, or came back for any reason.



https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2020/04/24/28_million_mail-in_ballots_went_missing_in_last_four_elections_143033.html#!
Oh, those ballots. Those were when republicrats changed their votes to demonrats in midstream. Yeah, that's it. :2 thumbs up:
 

Uglytruth

Midas Member
Midas Member
Site Supporter ++
Joined
Apr 6, 2011
Messages
9,657
Likes
17,493
#91
Oh, those ballots. Those were when republicrats changed their votes to demonrats in midstream. Yeah, that's it. :2 thumbs up:
Don't forget about the dead voters or your a deadest!
 

EO 11110

CENSORSHIP KILLS
Mother Lode
Site Supporter ++
Joined
Jul 31, 2010
Messages
16,422
Likes
14,011
Location
clown world
#93
this chart says that only 20 percent of americans have confidence in vote by mail. so 80 percent not -- why is this even a thing?

true reform would feature an id check AND A PAPER RECEIPT - even gas pumps in shithole ghetto can do that

anything less is horseshit
 

ABC123

Platinum Bling
Platinum Bling
Site Supporter ++
Joined
Apr 10, 2010
Messages
4,831
Likes
8,932
#95
NJ City Officials Charged After 1 In 5 Mail-In Ballots Found To Be Fraudulent In Election



New Jersey Attorney General Gurbir Grewal filed voter fraud charges Thursday against two Paterson city officials who allegedly engaged in a mail-in ballot scheme in connection to a special election in May.



Grewal levelled the charges against Paterson City Councilman Michael Jackson, Councilman-Elect Alex Mendez, and two other men after the Postal Inspection Service warned Grewal’s office that hundreds of mail-in ballots were found in a Paterson mailbox, InsiderNJ reported Thursday.



The attorney general’s Office of Public Integrity & Accountability (OPIA) began a probe after the Postal Inspection Service issued the warning. Paterson authorities decided to conduct the May 12 special election through mail-in ballots due to the COVID-19 pandemic, which has reportedly killed more than 124,000 people in the U.S. (RELATED: Tucker Carlson: Mail-In Voting And Ballot Harvesting ‘Massively Expands The Potential For Voter Fraud’)



Only 13,557 of the 16,747 vote-by-mail ballots in Paterson were counted, a local NBC affiliate in New York reported in May. More than 800 ballots in Paterson were invalidated for appearing in mailboxes tethered together. One mailbox reportedly had hundreds of ballots tied together.

The board of elections disqualified another 2,300 ballots after concluding that the signatures did not match voting records.



One Paterson woman named Romana Javier, after NBC showed her a list of people who allegedly voted on her block, told the channel that she never received a ballot and did not vote. “We did not receive vote-by-mail ballots and thus we did not vote,” she said. “This is corruption. This is fraud.”



The potential for fraud as a result of state and local officials resorting to mail-in ballots has become a topic of conversation among conservatives. Twitter flagged one of President Donald Trump’s tweets for suggesting in May that California’s mail-in ballots will be “substantially fraudulent.”



Whoaaa



https://dailycaller.com/2020/06/26/new-jersey-city-councilmembers-charged-1-in-5-mail-in-ballots-fraudulent/
 

ABC123

Platinum Bling
Platinum Bling
Site Supporter ++
Joined
Apr 10, 2010
Messages
4,831
Likes
8,932
#99
https://wbckfm.com/a-michigan-city-clerk-has-been-charged-with-altering-ballots/?trackback=twitter_mobile

1593306772391.png


falsifying returns or records

forgery of a public record

misconduct in office

and multiple counts of using a computer to commit a crime.

She was released on $15,000 bond.







Read More: A Michigan City Clerk Has Been Charged With Altering Ballots | https://wbckfm.com/a-michigan-city-clerk-has-been-charged-with-altering-ballots/?trackback=twitter_mobile&utm_source=tsmclip&utm_medium=referral
 

the_shootist

Trump 2020
Midas Member
Midas Supporter ++
Joined
May 31, 2015
Messages
45,975
Likes
76,749
My negro fatigue is flaring up again
 

EO 11110

CENSORSHIP KILLS
Mother Lode
Site Supporter ++
Joined
Jul 31, 2010
Messages
16,422
Likes
14,011
Location
clown world
the double digit biden poll lead is based on beer virus induced mail in vote projections

the bill still video about how cali flipped 8 house seats in 2018 told me all i need to know. for those keeping score, that's a plus 16 for the bolsheviks........by just one state
 

ABC123

Platinum Bling
Platinum Bling
Site Supporter ++
Joined
Apr 10, 2010
Messages
4,831
Likes
8,932
1593352293482.png
1593352328809.png

Moar on voter fraud possibilities

Colorado.. Denver and Adams county have color coding for sorting Republican/Democrat.

In their video If you are unaffiliated and get two ballots you are suppose to fill out one and return unused ballot instead of destroying at home……the website says the complete opposite, fill out one and return, destroy second… what they up to?

Video no imbedding from padfag… Start time of discussion 1:51



https://www.9news.com/article/news/politics/voter-guide/voter-questions-about-colorado-primary-ballots/73-d1d8cd35-a33e-4da8-887d-7869010480a9
 

ABC123

Platinum Bling
Platinum Bling
Site Supporter ++
Joined
Apr 10, 2010
Messages
4,831
Likes
8,932
United States Attorneys Available to Receive Election Complaints



Richard P. Donoghue, the United States Attorney for the Eastern District of New York, and Audrey Strauss, the Acting United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, announced today that special telephone numbers have been set up to receive complaints of possible violations of federal election laws relating to tomorrow’s primary election in New York City and other counties in their districts.



The United States Attorneys said that their Offices will be available to receive complaints at the following numbers on Tuesday, June 23, 2020:



(646) 369-4739 (for Manhattan, Bronx, Dutchess, Orange, Putnam, Rockland, Sullivan, and Westchester counties) and



(718) 254-6790 (for Brooklyn, Queens, Staten Island, Nassau, and Suffolk counties)



In addition, complaints of possible violations of federal election laws may be made directly to the Federal Bureau of Investigation at (212) 384-1000.



The Department of Justice has an important role in deterring election fraud and discrimination at the polls, and combating these violations whenever and wherever they occur. The Department’s long-standing Election Day Program furthers these goals, and also seeks to ensure public confidence in the integrity of the election process by providing local points of contact within the Department for the public to report possible election fraud and voting rights violations while the polls are open on Election Day.



https://www.justice.gov/usao-edny/pr/united-states-attorneys-available-receive-election-complaints-2