Whatever is in it, it won't be enough stuff to be able leave fluffy white tube clouds for 100's of miles across the sky.
Dude. Planes ALREADY do that. Every single plane. Why is this hard to understand?
Whatever is in it, it won't be enough stuff to be able leave fluffy white tube clouds for 100's of miles across the sky.
You do realize that this in no refers to openly spraying the vax across the sky at 35,000', right?![]()
Feasibility of aerosol vaccination in humans - PubMed
The feasibility of using aerosol vaccines to achieve mass and rapid immunization, especially in developing countries and disaster areas, is being assessed on the basis of current available information. The aerosol mode of vaccine introduction, which best follows the natural route of many...pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
View attachment 262986
You'd need a much bigger plane than exists in order to spray anything in such volume that it could be clearly seen from many many miles away. When you see a fluffy white tube cloud that some try to say are chemical trails, they at least 5 miles and as much as 100 miles away from the observer.They would use a bigger plane higher up but same theory.
But those fluffy white tube clouds are not created by spraying chemicals into the air behind planes.Dude. Planes ALREADY do that. Every single plane. Why is this hard to understand?
But those fluffy white tube clouds are not created by spraying chemicals into the air behind planes.Dude. Planes ALREADY do that. Every single plane. Why is this hard to understand?
You don't seem to have much flight experience. Long haul aircraft don't just pick a compass heading on takeoff and fly directly to their destination, they fly over a series of predefined waypoints. If they are approaching a major airport, the waypoints over which ALL aircraft intending to land must fly over are the initial points into the traffic pattern. For an Atlanta type airport, you can't have aircraft from all compass points converging on the runways, they have to be channeled. That's what you are looking at in your video.
Below, the US Army Air Force "sprays" Germany during WWII.
If you knew any chemistry, you'd know that water is a byproduct of combustion, you'd know HYDROcarbons mix with oxygen yields dihydrogen oxide.
View attachment 243308
I think it's windshield washer spray, laced with chemicals of course.^^^^ man oh man, that plane must have a lot of spraying nozzles on it. Lol
Could be. We are in agreement that if the government could spray us they would, I'm fine with that thinking.You do realize that this in no refers to openly spraying the vax across the sky at 35,000', right?
An aerosol vax is one that is inhaled ad opposed being injected. If it were just sprayed into the air indiscriminatrly, there'd be no way to control dosage amount.
You'd need a much bigger plane than exists in order to spray anything in such volume that it could be clearly seen from many many miles away. When you see a fluffy white tube cloud that some try to say are chemical trails, they at least 5 miles and as much as 100 miles away from the observer.
Also, it makes no sense to spray poisons high up in the atmosphere as the air in the Stratosphere does not readily mix with air in the Troposphere. To spray it there it would wasted, as it could not hit the desired target.
Low level spraying, like crop duster would do, is the only way to do such a thing.
....but then it would be entirely noticeable by literally everyone.
^^^^ man oh man, that plane must have a lot of spraying nozzles on it. Lol
Granted. My response to @foolsgold 's pic was entirely tongue in cheek.Do you comprehend that we are ADDING new possibilities. We still understand contrails and ST condensation like that from the odd compression/vacuums created. Those cones don't last a second or two.
Only problem is that HAARP is not a run by the government and nothing about HAARP is even classified. If it really were capable of what some would have us believe, it'd be the most secret thing ever.Until "We The People" is educated and brought up to speed on weather modification technology, HAARP, "chaffing", cloud seeding and stratospheric aerosol injection how can we even discuss "climate change" and policies based on battling this "climate change".
What is .gov up too?
The existence of industrial level chem trails breaks down totally at the virtual impossibility of a world wide organization that would have to employ literally tens of thousands of people over 5 decades + and be intimately involved with several other massive industries, none of which have EVER hinted working for the industry in any capacity.Only problem is that HAARP is not a run by the government and nothing about HAARP is even classified. If it really were capable of what some would have us believe, it'd be the most secret thing ever.
Yep and I have seen it turn on and off according to a grid that was being sprayed.fuel additives that only come out sometimes,, lol. they routinely turn them on/off - esp when crossing previously laid lines of spray
Thank you. I've tried explaining this to a lot of people but they want to see what they want to see. There are even videos of B17 contrails breaking for 50 feet or so as they fly through a microclimate where contrails can't form. The atmosphere is not homogeneous and if you have planes following the same route, the upper level winds will blow the contrails from that specific area so it can appear like it is the same aircraft flying over and over through "spraying".You don't seem to have much flight experience. Long haul aircraft don't just pick a compass heading on takeoff and fly directly to their destination, they fly over a series of predefined waypoints. If they are approaching a major airport, the waypoints over which ALL aircraft intending to land must fly over are the initial points into the traffic pattern. For an Atlanta type airport, you can't have aircraft from all compass points converging on the runways, they have to be channeled. That's what you are looking at in your video.
Below, the US Army Air Force "sprays" Germany during WWII.
If you knew any chemistry, you'd know that water is a byproduct of combustion, you'd know HYDROcarbons mix with oxygen yields dihydrogen oxide.
View attachment 243308
I've argued the same point on here about the controlled demolition 911 conspiracy.The existence of industrial level chem trails breaks down totally at the virtual impossibility of a world wide organization that would have to employ literally tens of thousands of people over 5 decades + and be intimately involved with several other massive industries, none of which have EVER hinted working for the industry in any capacity.
Do you think that just maybe if you want to include spray tanks, pumps and a couple of 10's of thousands of pounds of a sprayable liquid into the design of an aircraft, you'll have to interface with the airframe manufacturers (Boeing, Airbus, etc.), the engine people (Pratt & Whitney, GE, Rolls Royce), get FAA certifications, train pilots to operate the sprayers, maintenance people, replacement parts, hundreds of lawsuits aggrieved ex-employees. Over 50+ years, not a single word? I could go on for a lot longer. To coin a phrase: "Come on Man!"
Who designs, makes and monitors the effects of the spray? What chemical plants make the spray, who loads and drives tank trucks filled with the spray to the airport, who pumps it into the tanks. Who runs the chem trail accounting department, designs the spray, payroll department, who are the executives? Where are the reports, never a single one leaked?
But, of course, none of the above will make a dimple in the certainty of the true believer.
All of this from the fact that when you combust a hydrocarbon, you have 2 principle byproducts: carbon dioxide and water.
nope. never commercial flights. the white jets are for one purpose - spraying crap into the atmNearly every commercial flight would involve black ops sneaking chemicals on/or an apparatus onto the rear of planes.
Exactly. Too many whistleblowers out there.I've argued the same point on here about the controlled demolition 911 conspiracy.
Nearly every commercial flight would involve black ops sneaking chemicals on/or an apparatus onto the rear of planes. They must be alien technology in itself. And then this massive operation would involve thousands, none of which would ever talk.
You've got to think these things through.
The chemtrailers have invested so much time and effort into convincing themselves of it, that to ever start thinking rationally about it would be devastating to their World-view.I've tried explaining this to a lot of people but they want to see what they want to see.
That might work.NOW - I will say this, if the FDA (or whichever appropriate gov agency) was compromised (we know they aren't, right?!?!) I could see a govt mandated fuel additive put into every commercial and private jet operating from the USA for the sake of "chemtrailing"....but that's the only way it would happen on a large scale. IMHO.
Does it? How well would the engine in your car work if we replaced 20% of the gas in your tank with aluminum and barium? Ie: the stuff people say is being sprayed? Oh yea, and strontium too! Do those things burn and produce thrust? Not that I'm aware of.That might work.
I've argued the same point on here about the controlled demolition 911 conspiracy.
Nearly every commercial flight would involve black ops sneaking chemicals on/or an apparatus onto the rear of planes. They must be alien technology in itself. And then this massive operation would involve thousands, none of which would ever talk.
You've got to think these things through.
Does it? How well would the engine in your car work if we replaced 20% of the gas in your tank with aluminum and barium? Ie: the stuff people say is being sprayed? Oh yea, and strontium too! Do those things burn and produce thrust? Not that I'm aware of.
Now we're back to nozzles?Doesn't have to go through the combustion. Put it in the exhaust part or just have a separate spray nozzle.
It's been long said by the chemtrailers that that the substance supposedly being sprayed is aluminum barium and strontium. Can those things be used as fuel in a jet engine?Or they could have some fancier chemicals that Are designed to be part of the combustion, plenty of energetic compounds and creative solutions.
Now we're back to nozzles?
It's been long said by the chemtrailers that that the substance supposedly being sprayed is aluminum barium and strontium. Can those things be used as fuel in a jet engine?
It seems to me that you are grasping at straws in order to find way, any way, to make it be a reality.
No, are you? lolAre you dense?
I didn't say it had to be.It does not have to be THE fuel.
What about the aluminum and strontium?Or make it a Barium Permagnate which would absolutely add to the thrust.
I didn't say it had to be.
Do those things burn and produce thrust? Not that I'm aware of.
No, I questioned what would be the result of replacing a portion of the fuel with the stuff that chemtrailers say is being sprayed.Ya, ya did.
How well would the engine in your car work if we replaced 20% of the gas in your tank with aluminum and barium?
No, I questioned what would be the result of replacing a portion of the fuel with the stuff that chemtrailers say is being sprayed.
How much lead was it that was added? Enough to leave visible plumes of lead?Still ran with Lead in the gasoline.
Are the engines designed for that?Barium and Strontium pure metals and as Rare Earth metals would be rather reactive. Less so than say the Alkaline Earth metals like Potassium that literally explode on contact with water. Aluminum can also easily be in some energetic reactions.... Ever heard of thermite?
How much lead was it that was added? Enough to leave visible plumes of lead?
Are the engines designed for that?
I get the feeling that you want there to be chemicals being sprayed on people,, as you seem to be rather incisive of the idea. What proof is there that anything is intentionally being sprayed? All I see is people who look up and see fluffy white tube clouds and insinuate with no direct evidence, that they MUST be nefarious in nature.
"Cloud seeding" is not fluffy white tube clouds.They've published papers and told you they do cloud seeding.
To make it rain?How it works amd why they would do so
If you think that cloud seeding equals chemtrails, you have set the bar pretty low regarding what constitutes proof.Enough proof for me.
Or in other words, you don't care if there is any real proof of fluffy white tube clouds being chemtrails, you just want to believe that they are?If i cared more id do some more analisis or even get some sample tested. But i dont.
Some contrails are persistent, some are not.All the other side has but contrails, even though these appear quite different.
been writing about this since april on gim2
every 2 or 3 minutes a jet sprayer crosses over my house headed out to the gulf of mexico. all jets are identical - solid white 737 size. in 15 years of watching them work -- never seen anything like it. i surmised they were building a heat/drought for the central/east central US
result -- texas and surrounding is having a HISTORIC heat wave and the beginnings of a historic drought. i think the drought will spread and impact the numerous farms and ranches in the targeted area
this every 2 or 3 minute pattern goes on all day long. it's like the berlin airlift of chemtrailing. they are cooking us