• "Spreading the ideas of freedom loving people on matters regarding high finance, politics, constructionist Constitution, and mental masturbation of all types"

WHITE HOUSE INSIDER: War with Iran planned by Trump, to occur in the Fall of 2019

Silver

Gold Member
Gold Chaser
Site Supporter ++
Joined
Mar 31, 2010
Messages
5,417
Likes
8,597
#1
I pray this is fake news...

https://israeltodaynews.blogspot.com/2019/04/iran-war-planned-by-trump-2019.html

Thursday, April 18, 2019

WHITE HOUSE INSIDER: War with Iran planned by Trump, to occur in the Fall of 2019

Tactical nukes and ground invasion planned for Iran, according to whistleblower

THURSDAY, APRIL 18, 2019 - ISRAEL TODAY NEWS STAFF

President Donald Trump and his inner circle are planning an extensive invasion of Iran, according to a source working in the White House.

The plan involves a ground invasion and the use of tactical nuclear weapons, in a campaign planned for the Fall of 2019. Iran will be "wiped off the map" according to the source, and the war effort is expected to cost "two and half times the Iraq War."

The war will be promoted by the news media and Trump will go right along with it, after an "expected False Flag pinned on Iran, probably something involving the boats in the Strait of Hormuz." The False Flag is an "integral part of the plan" as Iran has reportedly no desire or intent to start a war, according to the whistleblower.


Trump Administration planning war with Iran
The war plans have the White House staff "in an excited tizzy" as war-hawks like John Bolton put the "finishing touches" on the planned strike. President Trump initially showed resistance to the plan, but has since jumped on board with enthusiasm, convinced Iran is an "existential threat to Israel" and as such, a war is required to "eliminate them."

Further details have been revealed, including:

  • 100 tactical nukes will be used to eliminate the Iranian military.
  • 120,000 U.S. ground troops will be used in the invasion.
  • France, the U.K., Canada, Saudi Arabia and Israel are expected to join a "coalition" in support of the war.
  • CIA assets and counter-intel efforts have been ramped-up over the past year in preparation.
  • A "False Flag" is being prepared to be used before the war with Iran.
  • Propaganda is being prepped by White House and Israeli counterparts.
  • Israel will support the effort and Benjamin Netanyahu was reportedly "smiling ear to ear" during a recent meeting with John Bolton.
  • There are concerns Trump's "base" may resist or criticize the efforts, so further propaganda efforts are being made to "shore up support" for the war.
  • Expected casualties range between 1.2 Million and 2 Million Iranians and 5,000 US troops.

Due to President Trump's close relationship with Jared Kushner, a sense of "sober import" has been placed on the war effort, which is being as a fulfillment of "Jewish prophecy" within White House circles. Many in the White House believe Jared Kushner is the "Messiah" or Jewish "Moshiach" who cannot attain his "throne" until Iran is wiped out.

The White House source is a high level official who has been right about many other things in the past, and their identity has been verified.

Further information on the war with Iran is revealed in the video below:





The information in this article was provided to David Goldberg, a Jewish advocate and fellow at the Jewish Center for Antisemitic Study, by a former White House employee only known by the name of "Isabel". Her story has been aired on Mr. Goldberg's YouTube channel, and she continues to provide valuable information about what is going on in the Trump White House.

Antisemitic attacks against Mr. Goldberg continue, and are documented in his video series. Efforts to block this information and shut down the social media accounts of Mr. Goldberg continue to be an issue.
 

Mujahideen

Black Member
Midas Member
Site Supporter
Joined
Mar 31, 2010
Messages
11,357
Likes
20,874
Location
Wakanda
#2
The super secret plan to nuke Iran got leaked online? It’s pure BS.
 

Silver

Gold Member
Gold Chaser
Site Supporter ++
Joined
Mar 31, 2010
Messages
5,417
Likes
8,597
#4
The super secret plan to nuke Iran got leaked online? It’s pure BS.
The only reason I posted something from an unnamed source is because it gave a date - a not too distant date, and that there is an undeniable ratcheting up of hostilities from the Trump and Netanyahoo administrations.

There is a war going against Iran - designating the Republican Guard as a Terrorist Organization, same as ISIS and Al qaeda, is an act of war, sanctions are an act of war. War is not far fetched - if Israel gives the go ahead.

Even the Yemen veto was because of Iran.
 
Last edited:

Fatrat

Silver Member
Silver Miner
Site Supporter
Joined
Apr 15, 2018
Messages
3,434
Likes
3,013
#8
No doubt this will happen, timing is key though...
 

Silver

Gold Member
Gold Chaser
Site Supporter ++
Joined
Mar 31, 2010
Messages
5,417
Likes
8,597
#9
100 tactical nukes...only 100? What do these take out, Yugo's? And why, pray tell, would we do this?
We? Whats we got to do with it. Trump has even said, why have nukes if you can't use them.

Look it up yourself - maybe, maybe not - who knows.
 
Last edited:

Fatrat

Silver Member
Silver Miner
Site Supporter
Joined
Apr 15, 2018
Messages
3,434
Likes
3,013
#10
Only real Presidents use Nukes...he isn't going to live much longer, why should you?
 

SilverCity

Gold Member
Gold Chaser
Joined
Mar 31, 2010
Messages
3,421
Likes
3,173
Location
FEMA Region VI
#11
Warmongering, neocon, globalist John Bolton claimed regime change in Iran by the end of 2018. Maybe he finally got Trump's ear. Wesley Clark's "prediction " of seven nations in five years is a little behind schedule.

SC
 

ttazzman

Midas Member
Midas Member
Sr Site Supporter
Joined
Apr 2, 2010
Messages
5,569
Likes
5,843
Location
mid-usa
#14
i would think(hope) there are fully developed battle plans and scenarios for dealing with Iran...NoKo...etc should the absolute need arise.......the rest is propaganda,spin and leaks from there......the intresting thing here is not the plan...but the described intent to implement it
 

the_shootist

Midas Member
Midas Member
Midas Supporter
Joined
May 31, 2015
Messages
36,440
Likes
50,853
#15
I'll believe it when I see it! If we find ourselves in another neo MIC war with Iran under this administration, then I'll throw in the towel on Trump! I can't imagine any plan that a war scenario with Iran would be good for America!
 

coopersmith

for fuck sake..........
Silver Miner
Joined
Mar 31, 2010
Messages
1,762
Likes
2,748
Location
ogallala flats
#16
I wonder how many iranian sleeper cells are in america? Maybe well get to find out..........
 

Fatrat

Silver Member
Silver Miner
Site Supporter
Joined
Apr 15, 2018
Messages
3,434
Likes
3,013
#19
I think he is trying to drive up gas/oil prices, don't think it will work though.
 

hoarder

Dat Member
Site Supporter
Platinum Bling
Joined
Mar 30, 2010
Messages
12,146
Likes
13,260
Location
Montana
#20
i would think(hope) there are fully developed battle plans and scenarios for dealing with Iran...NoKo...etc should the absolute need arise.......the rest is propaganda,spin and leaks from there......the intresting thing here is not the plan...but the described intent to implement it
The absolute need is spin itself. All wars are bankers wars. They finance both sides and the media instigates it.
North Korea and Iran don't have a Bank of Rothschild yet. THAT is the absolute need.
 

Silver

Gold Member
Gold Chaser
Site Supporter ++
Joined
Mar 31, 2010
Messages
5,417
Likes
8,597
#21
I'm getting the feeling that war on iran is the works - designating iran's military as a terrorist org bypasses congress.

I just got some news about a deployment to centcom from someone very, very close to me - an afa grad, 9 years af officer, now natl. guard - he couldn't say where he is going, other than centcom (Afgan, my guess), this oct.
 
Last edited:

DodgebyDave

Metal Messiah
Midas Member
Joined
Mar 30, 2010
Messages
11,606
Likes
13,076
#22
Not buying it. If we started the deployment right now it would be about a year to muster and move 120k troops

Never mind the "tactical nukes" bullshit
 

Silver

Gold Member
Gold Chaser
Site Supporter ++
Joined
Mar 31, 2010
Messages
5,417
Likes
8,597
#24
Not buying it. If we started the deployment right now it would be about a year to muster and move 120k troops

Never mind the "tactical nukes" bullshit
Bug off, David the fake mechanic.
 

Silver

Gold Member
Gold Chaser
Site Supporter ++
Joined
Mar 31, 2010
Messages
5,417
Likes
8,597
#26
why? the point still remains, you do not mobilize that many troops in 10 mins
Sorry for being rude, my reaction to being trolled.

Iran is surrounded by bases and troops. They are bringing in the f35's for the 1st time to M.E.

This isn't like the prep for Iraq invasion - everything is already in place. 18 years of prep.
He's a better visual than the 1st map I posted:

map1.jpg
 
Last edited:

Goldhedge

Moderator
Site Mgr
Sr Site Supporter
Joined
Mar 28, 2010
Messages
43,550
Likes
71,301
Location
Rocky Mountains
#27

keef

Пальто Crude
Platinum Bling
Joined
Nov 11, 2011
Messages
6,736
Likes
6,376
Location
here
#29
Didn't he retire??
You may need to get out more.

They (WH) just officially declared the part of the Iranian Army that is in charge of nuclear development of being a "terrorist organization'.


Boltons whole purpose in life has been to be somehow neutralize Iran. All these other fights he initiates with minor countries are just appetizers :zombie:

Does that mean that a war is definitely planned? No.

But like living next door to armed neighbors you know to have criminal records, you might what to pay close attention late at night when all the yelling starts.
 

Silver

Gold Member
Gold Chaser
Site Supporter ++
Joined
Mar 31, 2010
Messages
5,417
Likes
8,597
#30
Does that mean that a war is definitely planned? No.
And you know that how? I say yes - you don't designate a country's military a terrorist org (first time) and impose an embargo to play footsie.
 

Mujahideen

Black Member
Midas Member
Site Supporter
Joined
Mar 31, 2010
Messages
11,357
Likes
20,874
Location
Wakanda
#31
We spend hundreds of billions on our military, the MIC wants to justify its budget. And Israel and Saudi Arabia both view Iran as an enemy.

The Jews run our banks and the saudis are the heart of the petrodollar. Everything comes to focus on Iran, despite Saudi Arabia being the ones who support isis and taliban and al Qaeda.

War with Iran is unwinnable unless we resort to genocide or a nuclear holocaust. They will produce millions of troops and will fight to the death on their land. We will run out of money and not have the stomach to keep sending our children to die for Israel before they give up.

How I see it, Iran doesn’t like the people who attacked us on 9/11 and who support isis (Saudi Arabia) and they don’t like the Israelis who try to subvert American sovereignty... the enemy of my enemy isn’t necessarily our friend but I strongly question the narrative that the American people should be at odds with Iran.
 
Last edited:

oldgaranddad

Gold Member
Gold Chaser
Midas Supporter
Joined
Feb 21, 2012
Messages
4,998
Likes
8,771
Location
On the top shelf.
#32
The way I see it, Iran is one of the support struts to the cabal. They serve a purpose.

By being the boogie man and $h1t stirrer they keep the cabal's military industrial complex in business, Iran also acts a conduit for illegal smuggling/black market and the money to be made by such activities that the cabal makes money off of by facilitating such activities and deal making.

You think those Afghani poppy growers saddle up their beasts of burden and hump that stuff on their own to Europe, USA and the rest of the world? No. The cabal's little minions do it and they get the vig. That's a lot of money the "cabal" makes playing both sides.

The Iranians are smart and crafty but they still need counterparts and accessories to accomplish the years of bypassing sanctions and downright smuggling on such a massive scale for any number of illegal activities. That's where the cabal came in.

That said, if Trump is about to lower the boom on the cabal, now that the Mueller farce is over, wouldn't it make sense for the cabal to tell their Ayatollahs to start churning the feces loaded cauldron around at that very time? Didn't Sun Tzu say "let the enemy operate on your timetable and let them think it's theirs"? (I'm really paraphrasing here.)

A few tactical strikes with B61-12 nuclear bunker busters would make sense taking out Iran's nuclear production facilities and undoing Obama's stealth arming of Iran. You'd be hard pressed to find anyone in the US shedding a tear for Iran's Islamic Guard and their nuclear facilities except for the really disconnected lefties who will most likely will feel a wrath they never could have comprehended from a majority of their fellow citizens.

Since most of Iran's facilities are away from the general population the shock and awe of a few simultaneous mushroom clouds rising up should silence most of Trump's critics as the Islamic regime collapses. Couple that with whatever indictments, arrests and revelations against the elites and their followers here at home.

Hey! Didn't anyone think that the quick guilty pleas by the wealthy, famous and connected NXIVM players happened awfully really fast? Usually rich people lawyer up and play the legal long ball game and wear down the prosecution to get the terms they want. This time it just did not happen. This is what will probably happen when Trump starts to draw in the seine net on the cabal. Linking the cabal to Iran would be a master stroke of genius and allow him to prosecute things he probably couldn't do in a civilian court.

Now, the question is can Trump keep the boots off the ground (except for a few cherry picked temporary forays for specific tasks like grabbing the Mullah's gold, etc.) so that casualties remain low and public opinion high.

I'm no war hawk but this is the only logical scenario I could think of... and yes, I do see the illogic of using nuclear weapons but then again, nothing logical ever seems to persuade the Iranian zealots except massively over the top brute force.
 

Silver

Gold Member
Gold Chaser
Site Supporter ++
Joined
Mar 31, 2010
Messages
5,417
Likes
8,597
#33
We spend hundreds of billions on our military, the MIC wants to justify its budget. And Israel and Saudi Arabia both view Iran as an enemy.

The Jews run our banks and the saudis are the heart of the petrodollar. Everything comes to focus on Iran, despite Saudi Arabia being the ones who support isis and taliban and al Qaeda.

War with Iran is unwinnable unless we resort to genocide or a nuclear holocaust. They will produce millions of troops and will fight to the death on their land.
Iran could be decapitated before any troops step foot - stutnix and kill switches shut down their power grid (see Venezuela), shock and awe, 24 hour bombing for weeks, nukes, etc. It just depends on how far the 'neighbor' wants to take it. Genocide has been a strategy for a long time.
 

Silver

Gold Member
Gold Chaser
Site Supporter ++
Joined
Mar 31, 2010
Messages
5,417
Likes
8,597
#34
'the W-76-2 has an estimated yield of five to seven kilotons. The bomb dropped on Hiroshima, for example, had a yield of 15 to 17 kilotons'



Trump Administration Begins Production of New Nuclear Weapon
The W-76-2 weapon has a smaller bang than most nukes, but it’s a nuke just the same.




By Kyle Mizokami
Feb 1, 2019




U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist 1st Class Ronald Gutridge/Released

The Trump Administration is racing to field a new nuclear weapon designed to counter Russia and enhance nuclear deterrence.

The W-76-2 warhead will be delivered to the U.S. Navy for deployment on ballistic missile submarines in late 2019. Proponents claim the new warhead will enable the U.S. to respond to Russian nuclear weapons proportionately, but critics claim the W-76-2 is just another nuclear weapon and similarly dangerous.

The W-76-2 is an adaptation of the older W-76-1, currently fitted to Trident D-5 submarine-launched ballistic missiles aboard the Navy’s Ohio-class submarines. The U.S. Navy maintains several Ohio subs on patrol at any time. Current estimates put the force at ten submarines, with a total of 212 Trident D-5 missiles and 945 W-76-1 warheads on call at any time. The U.S. will field an unknown number of the new warheads.

The W-76-2 is designed to have a far smaller explosive yield than other nukes. While its predecessor makes about 100 kilotons of boom, the W-76-2 has an estimated yield of five to seven kilotons. (A kiloton is defined as the equivalent of 1,000 tons of TNT. The bomb dropped on Hiroshima, for example, had a yield of 15 to 17 kilotons, meaning the new nuke would be less powerful than that.)

The U.S. government's 2018 Nuclear Posture Review (NPR) claims that Russia is lowering its threshold for using low-yield nuclear weapons in wartime and warned that the U.S. must move to match this capability. “Russia’s belief that limited nuclear first use,” the NPR states, “potentially including low-yield weapons, can provide such an advantage is based, in part, on Moscow’s perception that its greater number and variety of non-strategic nuclear systems provide a coercive advantage in crises and at lower levels of conflict.”



Russian Iskander-M nuclear-capable short-range ballistic missile.
Mikhail TereshchenkoGetty Images

The W-76-2 is America’s response to Russia’s alleged change in nuclear thinking. Consider a hypothetical conventional war between the United States and Russia. If the report is to be believed, then Russia could use or threaten to use nuclear weapons, particularly low-yield ones, if it started losing. The W-76-2 seeks to demonstrate to Russia that the U.S. will be able to match the use of low-yield nuclear weapons without escalating to larger ones, like the original W-76-1, leaving the Russians with no advantage in using nukes to begin with.

But critics argue the NPR is mistaken, and that Russian nuclear policy has not changed. A nuclear weapon is a nuclear weapon, and the use of one by either side will invite the other side to use its own nukes, potentially leading to all-out nuclear war. In other words, the doctrine of assured destruction still holds. As a result, nuclear war remains as unlikely as it has ever been. Critics also contend that the cost of creating the new weapons is ultimately unnecessary and wasteful.

According to the National Nuclear Security Administration, the first W-76-2 is under construction at the Pantex Plant in Texas, the primary site for the assembly, disassembly, testing, and evaluation of nuclear weapons in the United States. The first warhead should reach the U.S. Navy by late 2019.
 

Silver

Gold Member
Gold Chaser
Site Supporter ++
Joined
Mar 31, 2010
Messages
5,417
Likes
8,597
#35
official denial...

Pompeo: US Does Not Plan Direct Military Intervention in Iran

Says US not using the language of regime change Jason Ditz Posted on April 21, 2019Categories NewsTags Iran, Pompeo, Trump

Last Monday, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo held a meeting with a group of “community leaders” during which he said that the US was not seeking to impose regime change in Iran through direct military intervention.

Though the US has been threatening Iran pretty regularly for years, and particularly since President Trump took office, Pompeo claimed that he was “careful not to use the language of regime change” because they didn’t intend to force the issue militarily if it didn’t happen on its own from sanctions and US pressure.

That said, Pompeo said that the administration would’ve handed the 2009 Green Movement “differently” from the Obama Administration, without specifying how. He also joked with the audience about a possible Iran coup, saying even if the US was planning one, they wouldn’t admit it.

The “community leaders” also asked about the administration’s ties to the Mujahedin-e Khalq (MEK), a terror organization in Iran, which the US de-listed in 2012. Pompeo insisted that he and Trump had never spoken at MEK rallies, though John Bolton had.
 

Silver

Gold Member
Gold Chaser
Site Supporter ++
Joined
Mar 31, 2010
Messages
5,417
Likes
8,597
#36
Cholo Pompeo Gangsta Rap: “We Lie, We Cheat, We Steal.”

Posted on April 21, 2019by L

“What’s the cadet motto at West Point? You will not lie, cheat, or steal, or tolerate those who do. I was the CIA director. We lied, we cheated, we stole. It’s – it was like – we had entire training courses. It reminds you of the glory of the American experiment.”​
Former CIA Director Mike Pompeo — Texas A&M University (April 15, 2019)
“Beware that, when fighting monsters, you yourself do not become a monster… for when you gaze long into the abyss, the abyss gazes also into you.”​
Friedrich Nietzsche
 

hoarder

Dat Member
Site Supporter
Platinum Bling
Joined
Mar 30, 2010
Messages
12,146
Likes
13,260
Location
Montana
#37
We spend hundreds of billions on our military, the MIC wants to justify its budget. And Israel and Saudi Arabia both view Iran as an enemy.
From a strategic standpoint, the best thing for Israel is that the Americans and the Islamic world annihilate each other. It makes sense to me that they would support it. It doesn't even matter whether it's winnable or who wins, just as long as their numbers are greatly reduced.
 

smilershouse

Gold Member
Gold Chaser
Joined
Apr 1, 2010
Messages
2,378
Likes
1,217
Location
Australia
#38
From a Globaphiles perspective, sovereign nations MUST comply and renounce their independence. The sovereignty's of Afghanistan, the Arab springs, and Iraq have been dealt a death blow, and, Syria is in chaos leaving Cuba, Iran, and N.Korea pasted as rogue nations. Cuba I believe opened its doors to capitalist pillagers so is no longer tarnished as a rogue nation. Iraq and Libya dared to sell their oil away from the USD bourse, now Iran is being targeted for the same objective.

What the Sino-Russian pact think of an attack is yet to be seen.

Grab ya popcorn or start prepping would be sound advice.

SH
 

keef

Пальто Crude
Platinum Bling
Joined
Nov 11, 2011
Messages
6,736
Likes
6,376
Location
here
#39
What the Sino-Russian pact think of an attack is yet to be seen.

Grab ya popcorn or start prepping would be sound advice.

SH
Yeah, the Chinks/Russians can barely keep up with all the threats from the US Empire of Debt.

No sooner do they shut down the coup threats to Venezuela, than do team Pompeo/Bolton pick out their next target, Iran.

It's like following a bully around the world's playground. As soon as a real superpower shows up to face them, they back down.
 

Cigarlover

Gold Member
Gold Chaser
Sr Site Supporter
Joined
Dec 18, 2011
Messages
6,604
Likes
12,432
#40
Someday all these wars will come to an end. Rome will once again fall. What if Iran SA, Jordan and Lebanon declared Israel a terrorist organization? They then have the right to invade? Why is it no other country imposes embargoes or trade sanctions except the US? How long will the rest of the world stand by and watch the US just take over one country at a time?
I'm pretty sure Russia doesn't just sit by while the US invades Iran.