• "Spreading the ideas of freedom loving people on matters regarding metals, finance, politics, government and many other topics"

WHO IS NEIL GORSUCH? 10 THINGS YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT TRUMP'S SUPREME COURT NOMINEE

Goldhedge

Moderator
Site Mgr
Sr Site Supporter
GIM Hall Of Fame
Joined
Mar 28, 2010
Messages
54,711
Likes
105,808
Location
Rocky Mountains
#1
Judge Andrew Napolitano was a good resource...


WHO IS NEIL GORSUCH? 10 THINGS YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT TRUMP'S SUPREME COURT NOMINEE
By: Nate Madden | January 31, 2017


Associated Press

Donald Trump has nominated 10th Circuit Judge Neil Gorsuch to fill the late Antonin Scalia’s seat on the Supreme Court.

Here’s what you need to know:

1. His academic resume alone is very impressive:
He completed his undergraduate studies at Columbia University in New York, got his J.D. from Harvard Law School, and then earned his doctorate from Oxford after studying under the titanic legal philosopher and natural lawyer John Finnis.

2. There would also be another interesting first:
After clerking under Justice Byron White, Gorsuch clerked for Justice Anthony Kennedy. If confirmed, it would be the first time a Supreme Court justice sat on the same bench as a jurist for whom he’d previously clerked.

3. He knows the struggles of being a conservative on a liberal college campus:
According to a bio prepared by the Alliance for Justice during his confirmation process in 2006 outlines his conservative student journalism 30 years prior:

“While in college, Mr. Gorsuch co-founded a newspaper and a magazine at Columbia University. Both publications – The Morningside Review (the magazine) and The Federalist (the newspaper) – were intended to counter what Mr. Gorsuch and his co-founders saw as the predominance of liberal political views at Columbia during the mid-to-late 1980s. A review of available issues of the The Morningside Review, located in the Columbia archives, revealed two pieces authored by Mr. Gorsuch: one was a comment on U.S. policy in Afghanistan; the other, a general defense of conservative political philosophy. The Columbia archives also contain most, but not all, of the editions of the The Federalist published during Mr. Gorsuch’s tenure at the paper. According to its initial statement of purpose, The Federalist attempted to provide a “classically liberal” forum for conservative students and others who want to air views not typically heard on campus. Mr. Gorsuch, one of the paper’s three founders, served on the board of editors and later as a contributor.”

4. He’s no fan of over-litigation:

Frivolous lawsuit-mongers — leftist and otherwise — may want to take heed to Gorsuch’s 2005 op-ed in National Review, where he calls out the Left’s obsession with what Justice Scalia called “social transformation without representation”:

During the New Deal, liberals recognized that the ballot box and elected branches are generally the appropriate engines of social reform, and liberals used both to spectacular effect–instituting profound social changes that remain deeply ingrained in society today. In the face of great skepticism about the constitutionality of New Deal measures in some corners, a generation of Democratic-appointed judges, from Louis Brandeis to Byron White, argued for judicial restraint and deference to the right of Congress to experiment with economic and social policy. Those voices have been all but forgotten in recent years among liberal activists. It would be a very good thing for all involved–the country, an independent judiciary, and the Left itself–if liberals take a page from David von Drehle and their own judges of the New Deal era, kick their addiction to constitutional litigation, and return to their New Deal roots of trying to win elections rather than lawsuits.

5. He’s pro-term limits (or at least was during the Bush 41 administration):
According to a 1992 paper he co-authored shortly after finishing law school at Harvard:

Recognizing that men are not angels, the Framers of the Constitution put in place a number of institutional checks designed to prevent abuse of the enormous powers they had vested in the legislative branch. Bicameralism, frequent elections, staggered terms, differing qualifications, shared and exclusive powers, and state control over election procedures are all examples of the mechanisms the Framers crafted with the hope of ensuring a responsive yet responsible legislature. A term limit, we suggest, is simply an analogous procedure designed to advance much the same substantive end.

Gorsuch and Guzman argue that this has been upended by the party system, legislative seniority, committee assignments and things of that ilk, thus precipitating term limits.

6. He’s literally written a book on life issues:
After studying the issue at Oxford, Gorsuch penned a book about the moral and legal arguments surrounding the end-of-life debate, entitled “The Future of Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia.” Published by Princeton University Press, the work is cited extensively in Ryan Anderson’s Heritage Foundation paper on physician-assisted suicide from 2015.

7. He’s also a rock star on federal regulations administrative law:
One area where Neil Gorsuch appears to be more of an originalist than Justice Scalia is on the question of giving federal agencies the ability to interpret statutes themselves and make de-facto regulations. The so-called Chevron Deference is one area where Gorsuch has made substantial waves as an appellate judge with a dynamite opinion back in August:

“There’s an elephant in the room with us today. We have studiously attempted to work our way around it and even left it unremarked. But the fact is Chevron and Brand X permit executive bureaucracies to swallow huge amounts of core judicial and legislative power and concentrate federal power in a way that seems more than a little difficult to square with the Constitution of the framers’ design. Maybe the time has come to face the behemoth.”

“For administrative law nerds, U.S. Tenth Circuit Court Judge Neil Gorsuch’s” Chevron opinion “is about as thrilling as it gets,” reads a press release from the Pacific Legal Foundation.

8. He’s no fan of over-criminalization:
In a 2013 lecture at the Federalist Society, Gorsuch tackled head on the problem of having far too many laws on the books:



“What about our criminal justice system, you might ask. It surely bears its share of ironies too. Consider this one. Without question, the discipline of writing the law down—of codifying it—advances the law’s interest in fair notice. But today we have about 5,000 federal criminal statutes on the books, most of them added in the last few decades, and the spigot keeps pouring, with literally hundreds of new statutory crimes inked every single year."

“Neither does that begin to count the thousands of additional regulatory crimes buried in the federal register. There are so many crimes cowled in the numbing fine print of those pages that scholars have given up counting and are now debating their number."

“When he led the Senate Judiciary Committee, Joe Biden worried that we have assumed a tendency to federalize, ‘Everything that walks, talks, and moves.’ Maybe we should say ‘hoots’ too, because it’s now a federal crime to misuse the likeness of Woodsy the Owl. (As were his immortal words: ‘Give a hoot, don’t pollute!’) Businessmen who import lobster tails in plastic bags rather than cardboard boxes can be brought up on charges. Mattress sellers who remove that little tag? Yes, they’re probably federal criminals too."

9. He pulls no punches on due process rights:
Another notable area of Neil Gorsuch’s jurisprudence revolves around the Fourth Amendment and his decisions on issues surrounding search and seizure — especially as they relate to technology and cyber security. “New technologies bring with them not only new opportunities for law enforcement to catch criminals,” he wrote in an opinion in U.S. v. Denson, “but also new risks for abuse and new ways to invade constitutional rights.”

In another case, which focused on police entering a property without consent, Gorsuch ruled that the home owner had “unambiguously” revoked the government’s ability to enter his home unwarranted when he posted a no-trespassing sign on his property.

10. He won’t be that easy to confirm:
With a resume this impressive, Senate Democrats are going to put up one hell of a fight to get someone more “mainstream,” as Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y. (F, 2%) has demanded. Republicans will either have to get rid of the filibuster for judicial nominations or invoke the two-speech rule to get Gorsuch onto the bench.


- See more at: https://www.conservativereview.com/...ps-supreme-court-nominee#sthash.grJOya2h.dpuf
 

mayhem

RIP 9/6. Anything new is posted by his widow.
Silver Miner
Site Supporter
Joined
Mar 30, 2010
Messages
4,334
Likes
6,322
#2
If he is approved Clarence Thomas will announce that he is leaving in June. I said it here first.
 

oldgaranddad

Platinum Bling
Platinum Bling
Midas Supporter ++
Joined
Feb 21, 2012
Messages
6,087
Likes
12,140
Location
On the top shelf.
#3
If he is approved Clarence Thomas will announce that he is leaving in June. I said it here first.
...and Kagin and Sotomayor will play "Weekend at Bernies" for the next several years with Ginsberg or until her mortal remains crumble into dust.
 

mayhem

RIP 9/6. Anything new is posted by his widow.
Silver Miner
Site Supporter
Joined
Mar 30, 2010
Messages
4,334
Likes
6,322
#4
This will be a huge fight. No judges will ever get confirmed without suspending the 60 rule, especially this guy. He is for term limits also.

Edit to add:
Note, this is the first appointment of a WASP to the court since 1975 (Stevens by Ford). That rather broadly defined ethnic group was once an overwhelming majority of Americans, almost everyone during the Revolution. Even today, roughly 40% of Americans would more or less fit that label. So now this minority group which has been utterly abused for two generations by the banker occupation government will get a token spot on the SCOTUS again. Note WASPs would need 4 judges to be fairly represented.
 

mayhem

RIP 9/6. Anything new is posted by his widow.
Silver Miner
Site Supporter
Joined
Mar 30, 2010
Messages
4,334
Likes
6,322
#5
Off topic, and I don't feel like starting one.

Rogue POTUS Twitter account
The unofficial resistance team inside the White House. We will block anyone who asks us to ID ourselves (including press), or who makes suggestions of violence.

https://twitter.com/RoguePOTUSStaff
 

Scorpio

Hunter of Chin Li's Boo Hoo Flu
Founding Member
Board Elder
Site Mgr
Midas Supporter ++
Joined
Mar 25, 2010
Messages
32,802
Likes
47,884
#6
Rogue POTUS Twitter account
The unofficial resistance team inside the White House. We will block anyone who asks us to ID ourselves (including press), or who makes suggestions of violence.

Who signs your check?

Ok then, so if'n you don't like the lay of the land, then maybe you should man up and move on?

I can think of a few ways this could be brought to a screeching halt...........
 

mayhem

RIP 9/6. Anything new is posted by his widow.
Silver Miner
Site Supporter
Joined
Mar 30, 2010
Messages
4,334
Likes
6,322
#7
Who signs your check?

Ok then, so if'n you don't like the lay of the land, then maybe you should man up and move on?

I can think of a few ways this could be brought to a screeching halt...........
We used to do stuff like this to dispense disinfo. Could be a real mole, who knows. #UnholyTrinity is a interesting hashtag read though. Let's face it things have to be in chaos there at the pace he is running it. That's why I reading more than posting. OK Hi Jack off.
 

mayhem

RIP 9/6. Anything new is posted by his widow.
Silver Miner
Site Supporter
Joined
Mar 30, 2010
Messages
4,334
Likes
6,322
#9

Buck

Come On, Man!
Midas Member
Site Supporter ++
Joined
Apr 13, 2011
Messages
15,236
Likes
17,357
#10
Mayem, you may be right, you may be wrong but to watch a POTUS in action is quite a delight!

And this POTUS's actions appear to be Bullseyes, to use a bar term, while all the while, I haven't seen him grab one pussy

Imagine that
 

mayhem

RIP 9/6. Anything new is posted by his widow.
Silver Miner
Site Supporter
Joined
Mar 30, 2010
Messages
4,334
Likes
6,322
#11
Mayem, you may be right, you may be wrong but to watch a POTUS in action is quite a delight!

And this POTUS's actions appear to be Bullseyes, to use a bar term, while all the while, I haven't seen him grab one pussy

Imagine that
Just reading two different rouge moles in the white house on twitter. Need to have a total perspective to know the truth. Not jumping ship, just following along.

Rogue WH Snr Advisor
and
Rogue POTUS Staff
 

Silver

Midas Board Mmbr
Midas Supporter
Platinum Bling
Joined
Mar 31, 2010
Messages
7,500
Likes
12,973
#12
Gorsuch sounds alright to me - especially considering the last few social justice warrior judges. A WASP has become a rarity.
 

Goldhedge

Moderator
Site Mgr
Sr Site Supporter
GIM Hall Of Fame
Joined
Mar 28, 2010
Messages
54,711
Likes
105,808
Location
Rocky Mountains
#13
It wouldn't be difficult to expose twitter mole.

Just insert fake news in several small meetings and see who reports it.


Process of elimination.

Also, doesn't the NSA have eyes on every transmission?
 

anywoundedduck

Gold Member
Gold Chaser
Joined
Mar 31, 2010
Messages
4,357
Likes
6,659
Location
Kentucky
#15
It seems we have another Antoine Scalia, except one with a PhiBetaKappa resume'.
Good pick. I say they go right away with the nuclear option. Fuck Schumer and the rest of the Democrats.
 

dacrunch

Platinum Bling
Platinum Bling
Joined
Apr 9, 2010
Messages
6,069
Likes
6,531
#16
Judge Andrew Napolitano was a good resource...
I second that motion... & hope Trump finds a good spot for him...

Supreme Court would be great!

Justice Dept too.
 

searcher

Mother Lode Found
Sr Site Supporter
Mother Lode
GIM Hall Of Fame
Joined
Mar 31, 2010
Messages
73,083
Likes
34,634
#17

Scorpio

Hunter of Chin Li's Boo Hoo Flu
Founding Member
Board Elder
Site Mgr
Midas Supporter ++
Joined
Mar 25, 2010
Messages
32,802
Likes
47,884
#18
yep, nice find mayhem
 

Silvergun

Silver Member
Silver Miner
Joined
Jul 26, 2011
Messages
743
Likes
894
Location
Commie-fornia
#19

mayhem

RIP 9/6. Anything new is posted by his widow.
Silver Miner
Site Supporter
Joined
Mar 30, 2010
Messages
4,334
Likes
6,322
#20
Pres Trump wanted Hardiman, but "The Holy Trinity", aka, Priebus, Pence, and Ryan wanted Gorsuch. The THT is being squeezed slowly aside now by Bannon and Kushner. Don't trust the THT, soft coup possible by impeachment. The Pres needs to slow down a bit and see what's going on. He can't follow everything at this pace. Yes it is good that he is "doing", but he is eating ton's of junk food, and getting little sleep. Without his wife and son Barron, what else is there for him to do.