• "Spreading the ideas of freedom loving people on matters regarding high finance, politics, constructionist Constitution, and mental masturbation of all types"

Wow. Seattle IS dying

Bottom Feeder

Hypophthalmichthys molitrix
Midas Member
Midas Supporter
Joined
Mar 31, 2010
Messages
7,444
Likes
13,261
Location
Seattle
#3
We already covered that. FunnyMoney insists that Seattle is doing just fine and whatever you see in the video is but an insignificant aberration and that the town will live on in glory forever and ever with great prosperity.

bb
Whew! That's quite the synopsis of what FM said.

BF
 

the_shootist

Midas Member
Midas Member
Midas Supporter
Joined
May 31, 2015
Messages
32,603
Likes
42,580
#4
We already covered that. FunnyMoney insists that Seattle is doing just fine and whatever you see in the video is but an insignificant aberration and that the town will live on in glory forever and ever with great prosperity.

bb
Praise Kek!
 

TAEZZAR

LADY JUSTICE ISNT BLIND, SHES JUST AFRAID TO WATCH
Midas Member
Midas Supporter
Joined
Apr 2, 2010
Messages
15,400
Likes
27,303
Location
ORYGUN
#5
I did 16 minutes, meet "Travis", what a POS !
This problem will not be fixed because there is more money & control to be had by allowing it.

I am wondering what is coming down the line.
We have been told:
Government will create a problem, in order to introduce a solution, that would ordinarily be rejected by the people.
When the problem becomes more unacceptable, than the solution, the people will accept the solution.

BUT, I wrote this back in 1969, I believe it to be accurate/true.

Government is not in the business of solving problems.
Their business is to perpetuate, control & profit from problems.
To solve a problem would stifle their power,control & growth.

I am wondering which is more applicable to this rising social disorder ?
 

Son of Gloin

Certainty of death? What are we waiting for?
Gold Chaser
Midas Supporter
Joined
Apr 6, 2010
Messages
6,149
Likes
13,070
Location
USA
#6
Very sad. Let’s elect more democRats to run our cities, because they do such a bang up job.
 

bb28

Silver Member
Silver Miner
Joined
Nov 5, 2011
Messages
1,551
Likes
1,373
Location
People's Republic of USSA
#8
I remember seeing poor people in the records of the great depression. These new people are zombies. The former were simply out of work and down on their luck so to speak. I suspect most of them settled down somewhere and resumed something bordering on a middle class lifestyle as the economy turned up.

bb
 

TAEZZAR

LADY JUSTICE ISNT BLIND, SHES JUST AFRAID TO WATCH
Midas Member
Midas Supporter
Joined
Apr 2, 2010
Messages
15,400
Likes
27,303
Location
ORYGUN
#9

Joseph

Gold Member
Gold Chaser
Sr Site Supporter
Joined
Jul 27, 2011
Messages
4,489
Likes
8,128
Location
south east
#10
Just the first ten minutes is plenty.

With few exceptions, Democrats across the board for years, and have, as usual ruined everything they touch
Just when you think they couldn't make it any more unbearable... they make it even more unbearable. The left once again proves they have their priorities in order by pushing gay democrats into office ... That should fix things ...

Jenny Durkan elected as first lesbian mayor of Seattle
“It wasn’t about me, or anyone else, it was about you, it was about Seattle and the future of Seattle,” Durkan said. “It’s a campaign about what Seattle will be like for that next generation, and you have committed to making it the best Seattle ever.”

Prior to her campaign, Durkan was appointed by former President Obama to serve as U.S. attorney for Western Washington, making her the first openly gay U.S. attorney in the country.

It’s wasn’t so long ago that Seattle had an openly gay mayor. Former Seattle mayor Ed Murray served starting in 2014, but resigned this year on Sept. 13 amid allegations by men he sexually molested them.
.
.
.
.

Aisha C. Moodie-Mills, CEO of the Gay & Lesbian Victory Fund, commended Durkan in a statement for her win.

“We are thrilled Jenny will become the first lesbian mayor of Seattle – and just the second woman elected to the position,” Moodie-Mills said. “Both women and lesbians are severely underrepresented in all levels of government, especially executive positions. While Seattle voters chose Jenny because of her proven track record of leading innovative reforms and fighting for all communities, it is also an undeniably proud moment for the LGBTQ community, which continues to see this strong leader break down barriers.”
.
.
.
.

https://www.washingtonblade.com/2017/11/08/lesbian-candidate-wins-election-to-become-seattle-mayor/
 
Last edited:

FunnyMoney

Silver Member
Silver Miner
Joined
Apr 1, 2010
Messages
2,615
Likes
2,368
#11
With few exceptions, Democrats across the board for years, and have, as usual decimated cities ...
Homeless is pretty bad in the red states too. And it was after Reagan was shot when they released all the mentally ill out onto the streets they'd been gathering for just this event.

DIM vs Repuke thing? What has been the Repuke answer to homelessness? Nothing that works and they've had plenty of chances.
 

Joseph

Gold Member
Gold Chaser
Sr Site Supporter
Joined
Jul 27, 2011
Messages
4,489
Likes
8,128
Location
south east
#12
Why just the first 10 min.? The abc news team really gets going much later than that. These things are made to get you to keep watching. Are you telling me they're not as good as hollywood after all? This is going to be so funny, I can't wait to tell them.
I wonder how long it took abc to set up the sets across so much of the city ? road blocks to detour traffic so it would look realistic ? where did they get all those extras in such a short period of time ? crisis actors ? the business people ? I wonder if they went to the Seattle dump to bring all the trash and debris and sling it across half the city. The tents, burned out grocery carts. Pulled a bunch of folks from the Seattle psychiatric wards ? I wonder ...
 

Joseph

Gold Member
Gold Chaser
Sr Site Supporter
Joined
Jul 27, 2011
Messages
4,489
Likes
8,128
Location
south east
#13
Homeless is pretty bad in the red states too. And it was after Reagan was shot when they released all the mentally ill out onto the streets they'd been gathering for just this event.

DIM vs Repuke thing? What has been the Repuke answer to homelessness? Nothing that works and they've had plenty of chances.
oh puh-leeze. You're continually deflecting. Nothing more. Why ? That was rhetorical. You deflect because you have nothing else to offer in defense of your bankrupt position on this issue.

FM: No, Seattle is a paradise ... , but , but, but, but ... some other cities suck .... somewhere ... Republicans ... yeah that's it . Republican cities ... they suck ... but not Seattle
 
Last edited:

TAEZZAR

LADY JUSTICE ISNT BLIND, SHES JUST AFRAID TO WATCH
Midas Member
Midas Supporter
Joined
Apr 2, 2010
Messages
15,400
Likes
27,303
Location
ORYGUN
#14
I don't like going to Seattle, Portland nor L.A.
I WILL NOT GO TO SAN FAGGOTCISCO FOR ANY REASON !!!
 

FunnyMoney

Silver Member
Silver Miner
Joined
Apr 1, 2010
Messages
2,615
Likes
2,368
#15
I don't like going to Seattle, Portland nor L.A.
I WILL NOT GO TO SAN FAGGOTCISCO FOR ANY REASON !!!
Yeah, I hear ya.

I haven't been to NYC for years. I'm afraid to go to DC or Rome.
 
Last edited:

FunnyMoney

Silver Member
Silver Miner
Joined
Apr 1, 2010
Messages
2,615
Likes
2,368
#16
...FM: No, Seattle is a paradise ... , but , but, but, but ... some other cities suck .... somewhere ... Republicans ... yeah that's it . Republican cities ... they suck ... but not Seattle
Seems to me a lot of the big cities suffer the same problem, once you get near a million or so residents the closed door meetings and crony agendas take over. I've been to many of the solid red cities in the red states and they all have some kind of homeless problem, at least the big ones I've been to. The Repukes and the Dims both have had plenty of chances to move the needle on this issue, they always bow to special agendas instead.

Seattle sucks, the rain and traffic will stress you out, especially if you're not on the free stuff wagon or have at least a median income. The homeless in LA have it much better, even with less of the free stuff.
 
Last edited:

engineear

Silver Member
Silver Miner
Site Supporter
Joined
Mar 11, 2011
Messages
1,844
Likes
2,177
Location
North of the Wall
#17
I remember seeing poor people in the records of the great depression. These new people are zombies. The former were simply out of work and down on their luck so to speak. I suspect most of them settled down somewhere and resumed something bordering on a middle class lifestyle as the economy turned up.

bb
The economy turned because we went to a wartime economy...time to donate all your, scrap metal, rubber, etc...oh...we'll need your gold too, while we're at it.
 

Buck

Gold Member
Gold Chaser
Site Supporter
Joined
Apr 13, 2011
Messages
6,107
Likes
5,695
#19
What I don't get are the few here who find any humor in any of this at all

Flame me if you like, but what's being shown here, on a few of these posts, represents a mental illness all on it's own

shame really, which shows that some of the ill don't live on the street


sick, really really sick
 

Joe King

Gold Member
Gold Chaser
Site Supporter
Joined
Mar 31, 2010
Messages
8,754
Likes
9,575
Location
Instant Gratification Land
#20
I've been to many of the solid red cities
What solidly red cities are those? Every "city" (close to a million pop or more) I know of is more blue than red, and most big cities are solid blue.
...and yes, many have a homeless problem. Difference is they all don't allow camping on the sidewalks nor pay people to be homeless.

All they are doing is making it easier for people to choose to be homeless.
...and that's the biggest problem. Making it easy for the homeless to remain homeless. As though it's a lifestyle choice.
 

Thecrensh

Gold Member
Gold Chaser
Joined
Jun 26, 2013
Messages
6,312
Likes
8,262
#21
Plenty of large cities.

1 million or more people: 56% HRC - 40% DJT
500,000 to 1 million people: 48% DJT - 46% HRC
250,000 to 500,000 people: 52% DJT - 43% HRC

Iot of cities, and JMHO, but from looking, it seems to me, from one person's individual subjective experience, that they also have a lot of similar problems, regardless whether they vote left or right.

The biggest cities are, by and large, overwhelmingly "blue"...and so expensive that the normal people have trouble living there. The "blue" policies benefit only the rich, and leave everyone else struggling to make ends meet and live a safe existence.
 

Joe King

Gold Member
Gold Chaser
Site Supporter
Joined
Mar 31, 2010
Messages
8,754
Likes
9,575
Location
Instant Gratification Land
#22
Plenty of large cities.

1 million or more people: 56% HRC - 40% DJT
500,000 to 1 million people: 48% DJT - 46% HRC
250,000 to 500,000 people: 52% DJT - 43% HRC

Iot of cities, and JMHO, but from looking, it seems to me, from one person's individual subjective experience, that they also have a lot of similar problems, regardless whether they vote left or right.
Way to dodge the question. I didn't ask the percentage of hag vs Trump voters. My post was about the cities leadership.


However, since you want to claim that we have large cities that are solidly red, could you please locate those cities on this map?

counties.png
 

Joe King

Gold Member
Gold Chaser
Site Supporter
Joined
Mar 31, 2010
Messages
8,754
Likes
9,575
Location
Instant Gratification Land
#23
Oregon has metro areas mostly red. OK , TN , NV. What exactly are you looking for?
What I'm looking for from you, is solid red cities that meet your prior definition.

once you get near a million or so residents the closed door meetings and crony agendas take over. I've been to many of the solid red cities in the red states and they all have some kind of homeless problem, at least the big ones I've been to.
What large cities near a million or more are "solidly red"?
....and the point is that the problem is mostly caused by dem/lib/prog/soc leadership in the cities.
 

the_shootist

Midas Member
Midas Member
Midas Supporter
Joined
May 31, 2015
Messages
32,603
Likes
42,580
#24
Oregon has metro areas mostly red. OK , TN , NV. What exactly are you looking for? A place without homelessness? What about Amarillo Texas, it is red.

If your point is that there's not a problem with any of the red cities, then if you believe that and therefore the republicans are the solution to all our problems, why don't you just say it?

I don't correlate cause and outcome here, the solution to the big cities turning blue over red is an outcome of the cradle to grave big gov't, just like RP said, - the homeless problem, the same.

Most of the problems that impact small cities and big cities alike are solved with less gov't, not more.
Weak, very weak!
 

Unca Walt

Midas Member
Midas Member
Site Supporter
Joined
Mar 15, 2011
Messages
9,183
Likes
13,104
Location
South Floriduh
#25
Joe King --

"Way to dodge the question. I didn't ask the percentage of hag vs Trump voters. My post was about the cities leadership."

That is what he does -- poorly, continually, and predictably -- when his dick has been nailed directly to the floor.

"If your point is that there's not a problem with any of the red cities, NO! then if you believe that NO! and therefore the republicans are the solution to all our problems,NO! why don't you just say it?" See Rule 8.

"I've been to many of the solid red cities in the red states and they all have some kind of homeless problem." See Rule 3.

Straight out of Rules For Radicals (No. 3, No.5, No.7 and No.12) No No No No

Right here: https://www.steelonsteel.com/saul-alinsky-rules-for-radicals/

Hey FM: Your dick. Floor. BIG NAIL. Still there holding you to the dirty floor.
 
Last edited:

Joe King

Gold Member
Gold Chaser
Site Supporter
Joined
Mar 31, 2010
Messages
8,754
Likes
9,575
Location
Instant Gratification Land
#26
I call a large city anything over 250K, you can define large differently and make a different point if you have one.
Ok.
....and here I thought we were talking about big (large) cities nearing a million population, or more.

Seems to me a lot of the big cities suffer the same problem, once you get near a million or so residents
You know, cities like Seattle is nearly as big as.
....but now you want to redefine that as 250K?
 

Joe King

Gold Member
Gold Chaser
Site Supporter
Joined
Mar 31, 2010
Messages
8,754
Likes
9,575
Location
Instant Gratification Land
#27
There were 3 line items in the statistics I provided: 250-500; 500-1M; over 1M. (see post several back)
I was going by your post #19. Ie: cities of near (or more than) one million population. You know, like the size of Seattle or bigger. Ie: the subject of this thread.

I don't consider a mere 250K to be near a million, do you?

Edited to add:....and my whole point is to get you to name the large "solidly red" cities you've visited. With "large" meeting your prior definition of near a million or more in population.
My contention is that all cities meeting your definition are solidly blue.
 

FunnyMoney

Silver Member
Silver Miner
Joined
Apr 1, 2010
Messages
2,615
Likes
2,368
#28
I was going by your post #19. Ie: cities of near (or more than) one million population. You know, like the size of Seattle or bigger. Ie: the subject of this thread.

I don't consider a mere 250K to be near a million, do you?
Seattle has around 3 million people, depending how you draw the line.

Most cities with a population of 250k have much more than that, often double that if you just extend the line into the surrounding suburbs.

Homeless people are able to roam both inner city and suburbs if that city allows them that freedom.

As I said before, several times already, if you have a point to make about the homelessness issue, then you are free to formulate and post that point. You don't need to come to an agreement about the definition of city/metro areas sizes to make a point about the homelessness issue. If you do need to do that, then set the definitions anyway you want to and simply make your point.

Do you have a point that you want to make that doesn't involve debating me about size definitions? Then if so, simply make it. If not, and you simply want to debate or negate my posts, then I refer you to the 3 points I made above and you can explain how you do not believe they are correct.

I made 3 very simple clear points about the MSM framed debates and the status quo provided solutions. (see 1,2 and 3 above in earlier posts). I am willing to defend those points with short follow-ups if asked.

I also believe the fear tactics are really silly, yet entertaining. I also provided my opinion on the music in the video and the cameo appearances.

I am surprised nobody wanted to ask me about the meth head guy - much more interesting a topic than the definition of "large" I thought.
 
Last edited:

Joe King

Gold Member
Gold Chaser
Site Supporter
Joined
Mar 31, 2010
Messages
8,754
Likes
9,575
Location
Instant Gratification Land
#29
Seattle has around 3 million people, depending how you draw the line. Most cities with a population of 250k have much more than that, often double that if you just extend the line into the surrounding suburbs.
Ok, first it was cities, now you're talkin' metro areas.


As I said before, several times already, if you have a point to make about the homelessness issue, then you are free to formulate and post that point.
The point is, it's the modern lib/dem/prog/soc leadership that makes the problem worse.


If you do need to do that, then set the definitions anyway you want to and simply make your point.
I was attempting to use your definitions, but you keep changing them.


Do you have a point that you want to make that doesn't involve debating me about size definitions? Then if so, simply make it.
Yea, the point is that the way the typical large city is run is in fact a big part of the problem, but the extreme way things are run in places like Seattle and San Fran, (dem/lib/prog/socialist) is the reason the problem is so much worse there than in other places.
Ie: it's worse there due to the extreme lib policies of those cities that attract and allow the homeless to keep being homeless. If it's made to be easy for people to be homeless, what is their incentive to want to no longer be homeless?
 

Joe King

Gold Member
Gold Chaser
Site Supporter
Joined
Mar 31, 2010
Messages
8,754
Likes
9,575
Location
Instant Gratification Land
#30
Some of the homeless are not capable of getting a job which pays enough to live on.
While those in this group can sometimes find P/T work, it is not enough usually to get the off the streets.
What got most of them into that situation to begin with? One day they just could no longer afford their rent no more? Or is it due to substance abuse issues and the poor life decisions that go hand in hand with that abuse? Ie: got kicked out because they chose to buy heroin etc instead of paying their rent/bills?


I have seen and spoke with homeless people in quantities much greater than, many times the number presented in the video. The video shows a dozen or so homeless people up close - that is an extremely small test case.
So you actually believe that "those few" shown in the vid are responsible for all the trash everywhere, camping in the streets, and homeless camps all over?
Those few were but an example of the larger problem
...and I understand that homeless exist in a lot of places, but most of those places don't encourage homelessness by paying them and allowing them to camp anywhere. Ie: places like Seattle are trying to make it easy for people to remain homeless, and that's the biggest problem of all.
 

Bottom Feeder

Hypophthalmichthys molitrix
Midas Member
Midas Supporter
Joined
Mar 31, 2010
Messages
7,444
Likes
13,261
Location
Seattle
#31
Let's condense this down to:
  1. Some peoples don’t want to work
  2. There’s some loonies there
  3. Piss poor planning
  4. Love drugs more than security
  5. Don’t give a shit as long as the spare change keeps coming
And no city large or small is exempt.

JMSO,
BF
 

tigerwillow1

Silver Member
Silver Miner
Site Supporter
Joined
Mar 31, 2010
Messages
765
Likes
1,194
#33
  1. Some peoples don’t want to work
  2. There’s some loonies there
  3. Piss poor planning
  4. Love drugs more than security
  5. Don’t give a shit as long as the spare change keeps coming
And no city large or small is exempt.
HOWEVER:
1. It's easier to work the welfare system in bigger cities because the population and politicians are more detached from the recipients.
2. Left-leaning politicians are more willing to buy votes by shielding people from the natural consequences of their own actions and choices.

Therefore,
People on the 1-to-5 list fare better in bigger cities, and in blue cities, and have an incentive to move there. Big blue cities are the best for them. Seattle is very big, and it's very blue.
 

Joe King

Gold Member
Gold Chaser
Site Supporter
Joined
Mar 31, 2010
Messages
8,754
Likes
9,575
Location
Instant Gratification Land
#34
Another "good" vid on Seattle's homeless problem.
...and I say "good" because there's nothing good about it.

As Walt said in the OP, first ten minutes are plenty.


"Seattle was supposed to be this shining beacon of what the possibilities were for your life, raising your kids, your family... there's a lot going on here that's being actively ignored. By the politicians, even the people, almost kind of a desire to just ignore a very blatant but then yet allusive reality that is a epidemic disguising itself as a homeless epidemic." Colion Noir shines a light on the epidemic disguising itself as a homelessness problem, that is plaguing Seattle, while the politicians refuse to even acknowledge the issue and instead scapegoat owners and diminish the rights of the law-abiding. This is the true story of Seattle and its Utopian lie.
 

Unca Walt

Midas Member
Midas Member
Site Supporter
Joined
Mar 15, 2011
Messages
9,183
Likes
13,104
Location
South Floriduh
#35
FF will NEVER watch it.
 

Joe King

Gold Member
Gold Chaser
Site Supporter
Joined
Mar 31, 2010
Messages
8,754
Likes
9,575
Location
Instant Gratification Land
#36
FF will NEVER watch it.
At this point, I don't care if he doesn't. I posted that for everyone else who might still be able to see the truth.
 

TAEZZAR

LADY JUSTICE ISNT BLIND, SHES JUST AFRAID TO WATCH
Midas Member
Midas Supporter
Joined
Apr 2, 2010
Messages
15,400
Likes
27,303
Location
ORYGUN
#37
Not exactly. There were a lot of druggies back then too, history books are full of substance abuses.

The drug issue is more powerful today, but what isn't? Used to be people took care of the mentally ill or they quickly were relegated out of sight. Once mentally ill became a crime instead of a health issue, then few were willing to venture in to help.
Well, maybe you are not as old as I am. I did not see any drugs & I only knew of one pothead, UNTIL the government started their "war on drugs", Nixon 1971, then I started to see drugs grow & grow to an epidemic. Now we have an opiod crisis, after our Marines guarded the opium fields of Afghanistan. Our drug problem is TEN TIMES WHAT IT WAS IN THE 1950'S & 60'S. Heroin is rampant here now.
This is just those that went through the system, many are caught & released or not caught.

war on drugs.jpg
 
Last edited:

TAEZZAR

LADY JUSTICE ISNT BLIND, SHES JUST AFRAID TO WATCH
Midas Member
Midas Supporter
Joined
Apr 2, 2010
Messages
15,400
Likes
27,303
Location
ORYGUN
#38
This shot tells quite story ! FM, you need to watch this !


seattle.jpg
 

Thecrensh

Gold Member
Gold Chaser
Joined
Jun 26, 2013
Messages
6,312
Likes
8,262
#39
This shot tells quite story ! FM, you need to watch this !


View attachment 128631
As much as I'd like to fully become a libertarian nation, I fear we won't be the nation described by the libertarians where Potholes are spontaneously filled by citizens, but instead will become a nation like the image above where people simply drug their minds away and lay in their own filth.
 

the_shootist

Midas Member
Midas Member
Midas Supporter
Joined
May 31, 2015
Messages
32,603
Likes
42,580
#40
Well, maybe you are not as old as I am. I did not see any drugs & I only knew of one pothead, UNTIL the government started their "war on drugs", Nixon 1971, then I started to see drugs grow & grow to an epidemic. Now we have an opiod crisis, after our Marines guarded the opium fields of Afghanistan. Our drug problem is TEN TIMES WHAT IT WAS IN THE 1950'S & 60'S. Heroin is rampant here now.
This is just those that went through the system, many are caught & released or not caught.

View attachment 128630
The more laws that government puts into the books the more criminals we create!